Leonard Cohen and the Death of a Ladies Man

Christopher John Stephens
Photo from You Want It Darker (2016)

Leonard Cohen, synchronicity, and coping at the dawn of a darker age.

A writer’s lines have a tendency to fly away into the great wide open once their creator has slipped through this mortal coil. They’re either improperly affixed to memes as a way to connect the writer to a cause, or they become permanently connected with a national event that will have troubling effects on the world.

In the case of Leonard Cohen, whose 7th November death (announced to the world on the 9th of November), many lines from his greatest songs were taken as commentary on the election of Donald J. Trump as 45th President of the United States of America.

Take the cynicism of “Everybody Knows”, the doomsday prophecies of The Future, and you get a picture of hopelessness and surrender in the midst of a permanent midnight. In “You Want it Darker?”, released just three weeks ago, the 82-year-old Cohen’s brutally raw reflection on his own imminent demise can easily be taken as an examination of the political world condition:

Magnified, sanctified, be thy holy name

Vilified, crucified, in the human frame

A million candles burning for the love that never came

You want it darker We kill the flame

The lyrics of other songs, more easy to take, were also shared. Cohen’s 1992 release The Future, whose title track was almost unbearably grim, also featured a more hopeful plea for peace. In the generically titled “Anthem”, Cohen’s booming voice of God baritone rises with the strings and female backing vocalists with a simple plea:

Ring the bells (ring the bells) that still can ring

Forget your perfect offering

There is a crack in everything (there is a crack in everything)

That’s how the light gets in

Perhaps he was inspired by a fellow Canadian, Bruce Cockburn, whose 1984 song “Lovers in a Dangerous Time” featured the beautiful simplicity of nothing worth having comes without some kind of fight / Got to kick at the darkness ’til it bleeds daylight. It wouldn’t be the first time great minds are so clearly are having a conversation with each other.

The Cohen lines kept coming, posted on twitter and Facebook, performed earnestly and otherwise as a way to cope with what many are seeing as the strange, bitter Trump-brand pill that needs to be absorbed because there’s no alternative, at least through the next four years. On the 12 November 2016 Saturday Night Live episode, performer Kate McKinnon, who had spent the past nearly two years satirizing the sometimes stiff formality of Hillary Clinton, started the program alone on the stage, sitting at a piano. She began playing the opening chords of Cohen’s “Hallejulah”, and at that moment it could have gone two ways: mawkish sentimentality or a focused and strong statement of determination. McKinnon finished the song, shortened but still featuring this stanza:

It’s not a cry that you hear at night

It’s not somebody who’s seen the light

It’s a cold and it’s a broken Hallelujah

As the last note finished, McKinnon addressed the camera and said: “I’m not giving up, and neither should you.” The performance was remarkable for two very clear reasons. Through the course of McKinnon’s performance as Clinton, she had at times emphasized Clinton's stiffness and seeming inability to connect to or relate with the common people. That was her job as a comic satirist, but astute viewers could see something deeper in her final bow as Clinton.

Her address to the camera seemed to be directly connecting with the thousands of people protesting in the streets in these painful days after Trump’s win and motivating them to continue as we all adapt to the unbearable coldness of this new normal. This was not a call to revolution, rage, or retribution. It was a call for self-empowerment.

McKinnon and SNL managed to put “Hallejulah” into a realistic, proper context. It’s a song of mourning. The full version is erotic and regretful, a perfect mixture of the sacred and profane. Of all the songs in Cohen’s canon, “Hallejulah” has been the most bowdlerized and sanitized, misinterpreted as strictly a song of faith and worship. For some the name Hallejulah is a call to the Lord, to God, whatever name best fits the purpose, for others it’s a cold and broken Hallejulah. I’ve never understood how or why it’s been relegated to a song of Christmas worship. For those three and a half minutes the night of 12 November 2016, it became something better.

Song lyrics constantly slip in and out of the atmosphere for those open enough to catch them, and in these times they’re more important than ever. Leonard Cohen, like David Bowie last January, died almost immediately on the heels of releasing a final work of stark mortality, grief, and beauty. That’s where the synchronicity plays a role. What did they know? How will their music be applied to these times? Were they preparing for something in another stage, in a different world?

At a “#lovetrumpshate” Rally on Boston Common last Friday, 11 November, the crowd sat in a large circle and a series of unamplified people rose to motivate their fellow citizens to mobilize, unionize, find strength in solidarity. They seem mostly young, and mostly white at this point, which doesn’t bode well for a universal Progressive Movement. My reaction to this Rally and others I’ve attended over the past few years, for Black Lives Matter and Occupy, was the same: what’s their thesis? Where is the structure? Who are the leaders? Perhaps it’s the teacher in me, but I just wanted a unifying theme.

It was then, as I wandered the crowd looking for great photographic moments, that I saw an older man in the middle if the circle loudly trying to start the young people in a chorus of Marvin Gaye’s “What’s Going on?” Most didn’t seem to know it.

The best songs for any movement, the most suitable anthems, are usually rousing and energetic. For the most part, that wasn’t in Cohen’s bag of tricks, at least in his original versions. What Cohen did have, in ways sometimes much clearer than his contemporaries, was an understanding that recognizing the darkness was never surrendering to it.

As the new regime prepares to take over the White House, already compiling its Enemies List and probably plotting regular calculated revenge, I want the young people to hear this stanza from Cohen’s 1988 “Tower of Song”. It’s humorous, self-deprecating, but also deeply raw and prescient. Cohen isn’t attributing this mighty judgement to anything religious, but that doesn’t matter. It may be mighty, but it can’t be final.

Now, you can say that I’ve grown bitter but of this you may be sure

The rich have got their channels in the bedrooms of the poor

And there’s a mighty judgment coming, but I may be wrong

You see, you hear these funny voices in the Tower of Song

Christopher John Stephens is an adjunct college English instructor at Northeastern University (Boston) and Bunker Hill Community College (Charlestown) Massachusetts.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.