The Libertines

Harold Liu
The Libertines

The Libertines

City: New York
Venue: Irving Plaza
Date: 2003-08-20

Photo credit: Roger Sargent
The Libertines faced a number of obstacles before they even set foot on stage at Irving Plaza. For one, they were touring without singer/guitarist/co-songwriter/co-founder Pete Doherty, who was removed from the band earlier in the summer due to alleged drug problems. Maybe I'm a purist/idealist, but I don't like the idea that a band can just replace a member, continue on, and pretend that nothing has changed (the Replacements come to mind first here, but there are countless others). I smell the stench of opportunism overwhelming the scent of authenticity, and I see the band turning into a traveling jukebox; adequately playing the hits night after night for the dollars and the kids without any hint of the chemistry that inspired the music in the first place. For another, the show was at Irving Plaza, quite possibly one of the worst venues in New York. The sterile, cavernous feel of the place has managed to suck the life and energy out of nearly every performance I've seen there. And then, Blackout 2003 hit. As if custom-designed to suck the momentum out of the Libertines' faintly existent U.S. career trajectory, the loss of power meant the band had to reschedule its show for the following week, almost certainly throwing a monkey-wrench into the social calendars of all the fans who had bought tickets for the original date. The floor was about half-full when the Undertones' "Teenage Kicks" came on the PA and the Libertines took the stage. Probably most of the fans that had tickets for the original date couldn't change their plans to see the rescheduled show, or didn't care enough to change their plans. Irving Plaza was horrid as usual, the sound was poor, and the bouncers were acting especially thug-like that night. And, as I suspected, there was a creepy air of ruthless efficiency in the band's performance. The rough, spiky edges of the record were smoothed out in favor of a more streamlined, MTV2 type of sound, and singer/guitarist Carl Barat mechanically stumbled around stage with replacement guitarist Anthony Rossomando just like he probably did with his old chap Pete back in the day when they called themselves the New Jam and they were playing some stinking basement in Camden Town or Hogwarts or wherever. Rossomando was cute -- he looked like Drew Barrymore's boyfriend, he enthusiastically wagged his head to whatever song Barat told him to play, and he and Carl both smoked cigarettes and stuck them in the headstocks of their guitars, just like the Clash used to do, I'm sure. At one point in the set, as if on cue, Barat removed his shirt. It wasn't torn off, there weren't screams from the crowd for him to take it off, he simply took it off -- as if this was a Libertines live tradition to be honored at every gig (every single live photo I've seen of the band has Barat and Doherty with their shirts off). The portentousness and unintentional hilarity of the scene was almost too much to bear. So how did I come to enjoy myself so much? Part of it had to do with the crowd, which burst into delirious enthusiasm with nearly every song. Fat men danced, skinny boys played air guitar, and practically everyone in the front half of the floor was feverishly bouncing around to the Libertines' sly update of the JamClashCocks. It's rare to see people having fun with such abandon at a rock show, and it must have rubbed off a bit on me. But most of it had to do with the music, which despite its inane, utterly derivative nature, is virtually impossible to dislike. The Libertines' newfound professionalism accentuated this point. They built tension and climaxes out of the inherent stops, starts, and changes in the songs, which merely served to underline how cleverly they were written in the first place. Highlights: pretty much the whole set, although "Death on the Stairs" and "Time for Heroes" merit special recognition, if not for the sole fact that its guitars remind me so much of that riffy pub-rock guitar sound on My Aim is True that I'm starting to think that the Libertines are less like the Strokes and more like Dire Straits, which makes me see them in a wholly different light. Now if only Barat would put his shirt back on.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.