David Antrobus


City: Vancouver, British Columbia
Venue: The Drink
Date: 2004-02-07

Photo credit: K. Raschke
For a concert whose early fuse sputtered damp as the surrounding Vancouver evening, with very early sound problems leading to a frustrated lineup outside, and an opening act -- Victoria's Chet -- that struggled gamely through as a result, it sure managed to pull things out of the fire by the end. Not that Chet themselves left little impression. A short, six-song set was enough to drape the fairly ostentatious club surroundings in dark, melancholy, post-rock gauze (please search opener: "The Cold Drank My Soul Away Into the Day"); a mournful guitar/cello/organ/drums ensemble fumbling and occasionally scoring around the margins of pop and (post) rock, that happened to feature yet more songs from Canadians about the explorer Ernest Shackleton (the penultimate "Antarctica"), who honestly appears to be the subject of a kind of national obsession these days. All of which helps anticipate, suggest, then tentatively offer up the precious frosty ambience of Duluth's Low: honorary Canadians if ever I've encountered such a creature -- a band that hails from the "Canada of America" (Minnesota), who are subtle and humble in their spiritual convictions, who seem to exhibit none of the hubris and au courant self-regard of many of their contemporaries south of the border, and who even feature an actual song called "Canada" (played here as the first encore). However familiar you may be with Low's recorded output, the live experience remains a revelation. I was feeling tired and cranky (or, um, Kranky) and, as it turned out, embarking on the first steps of a two-day full-immersion 102-degree fever-gauntlet, but from the opening notes of new song "Murderer", I was captivated by the extra dimensions that the visual dynamics of this compelling three-piece provide. Alan Sparhawk, stage-right and quietly intense, plied his trademark sheet-glass alto vocals and sparsely picked electric guitar (Telecaster and, occasionally a 12-string electric); Zak Sally provided occasional voice backing, but mostly drove in the pegs for a solid bass foundation; while the five-months-pregnant Mimi Parker kept time standing (feet-achingly still) at a minimal drum kit, clothing her husband's chilly fragility in warm fecund scarves of harmonic femininity. The result was so much greater than the sum of its parts that I was more awestruck by my overall sensory response (no doubt encouraged by beer and Tylenol) than by my capitulation to the cliché that opens this sentence. Live, Alan Sparhawk's voice is a marvel. Like the sparrowhawk his name vaguely suggests, it may lack the eagle's grandeur, or the owl's understated malevolence, but when it soars, swoops, hovers and drops in its precision dive, the effect is one of sheer controlled, concentrated power. And to shift the metaphor slightly, if Sparhawk represents the exact strokes of a fine-point pen, Mimi Parker is all charcoal washes, warm and deep and fertile. The magic created by the intersection and confluence of their voices goes beyond words into something simultaneously visceral and metaphysical. The band apologized more than once for the number of new songs in their fifteen-song set, but to be honest, it didn't matter. Sure, stalwarts such as "Dinosaur Act", "In Metal" or "Point of Disgust" were conspicuously and lamentably absent, the latter two even acknowledged by the band during the encore (Low's essential minimalism having extended to their not bringing along a piano, for instance), but newer offerings such as opener "Murderer", or "Poor Daughter", or "Silver Rider", were so absorbing in their intensity that they more than made up for it. The guitar crescendo on "Poor Daughter", for instance, was as coruscating and deeply turbulent as anything by Godspeed You! Black Emperor. By this token, the new full-length should be an aircraft hangar roar of shimmering tenebrous sound, dark and powerful in its way as one of the sombre secular gods in the band's great pantheon, Joy Division. Familiar songs they did play, however, included an audience-participation "La La La Song" from Trust ("Watch Mr. Sally for the [handclap] cues!"), a gorgeous "Two-Step" from Secret Name, and a stunning, intimate "Closer" from Things We Lost in the Fire. Not to mention an aching, shining "Tonight" and that crazy "Canada" song, our entire country serving as an apparent metaphor for the afterlife, somehow life-affirming and inclusive whatever politics or faith happen to spin your motor. The thing is, Low risk coming across as aloof, hermetically sealed and distant as alien spoor on a frigid world. Alan and Mimi's idealized intimacy, in less deft hands, could easily serve as an exclusion zone for the rest of us, rebuffing our fascination while simultaneously courting it with such stark yet beautiful melodies. A promising but unsatisfying tease, in other words. Somehow, however, they manage to achieve both warmth and self-sufficiency, through their vaulted music, and through an unassuming stage presence which extends to chatting easily with fans after the show. This should be no surprise -- no indie-elitists would dream of (unironically) covering songs by artists as disparate and populist as John Denver and the Bee Gees in their decade-spanning catalogue, but still -- for a band who opened for Radiohead in the world's massed stadiums just last summer, it was endearing and almost bewildering to be able to chat on this unremarkable stage with a weary Mimi about her second trimester blues while she dismantled her own drums -- or with Alan as he unplugged his gear and quietly updated anyone who wished to know (I asked about Rivulets specifically) on the entire Chairkickers stable. Earnest as it sounds, the members of Low come across as real people, with hopes and dreams for their children, a collective awe in the face of beauty, and a sense of the disquiet and sorrow lurking behind most things. Deceptively passive, patient and sonically pregnant (the spare instruments starkly present; the spaces in between quivering, expectant), the Low live experience resonates and delivers for a long time afterward -- fever dreams or no fever dreams -- marking the reverent passage of a musically and spiritually devout trio who nonetheless remain inspiringly blasphemous before the sneering altar of fad, fashion and the world's terrible wrongs.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.