Luc Ferrari: Didascalies

Christian Carey

Vanguard composer of electronic music's valediction.

Luc Ferrari


Label: Sub Rosa
US Release Date: 2007-05-15
UK Release Date: 2007-06-11

Composer Luc Ferrari (1929-2005) might not be a household name to casual listeners to avant-garde music, but he was a bona fide heavy hitter in Postwar Europe, nevertheless. Ferrari was a student of Honegger and Messiaen, an admirer of Varèse and (philosophically) Cage, an important part of the early Darmstadt circle of composers, and an innovator in electronic music; in particular musique concrete: electroacoustic music dealing with taped sounds, especially those from "real life". In Paris in the late 1950s and '60s, he co-directed the Groupe Recherche Musicaleswith another electroacoustic pioneer, Pierre Schaeffer. In addition to his work in the studio, including composing for radio and films, Ferrari wrote a number of instrumental works. Didascalies displays both his instrumental and electroacoustic writing. The CD is the third disc in a series devoted to Ferrari's music on the Sub Rosa label. The recording features two of the composer's last pieces and an open form piece from the 1960s, the recording of which was the last the composer worked on before his death.

The disc features three "virtual trios", with two live performers vying against a tape part. Pianist Jean-Philippe Collard-Neven and violist Vincent Royer are sympathetic collaborators, rendering enthusiastic performances despite the myriad complications set in their path by the hail of concrete sounds supplied by Ferrari. "Recontres Fortuites" contains what the composer calls "clearly anecdotal" sounds, including an orange juicer, noises of a metal table being moved down a staircase, speech, and the sounds made by women in the dressing room at a fashion show! Despite the sometimes curious nature of the "music" made by the aforementioned sound environments, Ferrari crafts a beguiling work which manages to incorporate a sinuously post-tonal pitch language, attractive all by itself, as well as the rhythmic and gestural materials suggested in the taped "anecdotes". Unlike some concrete pieces, where the instrumental accompaniment seems superimposed, on "Recontre Fortuites" Ferrari's keen ear searches out an organic way to integrate two seemingly disparate media. While "Didascalies" contains a similarly attractive surface, here Ferrari's eclectic approach seems to overreach a bit. In addition to the two instruments and tape part, the addition of stage directions and computer-generated sounds creates a somewhat confused textural polyphony that reminds one of that old adage about "too many cooks spoiling the stew" -- perhaps better rendered here as too many ingredients. Although singly lovely, the myriad gestures contained in the piece form an interruptive colloquy that never quite coalesces.

Composed in 1969, "Tautologos III" is one of those relatively free-form "action" pieces so in vogue in the 1960s. Ferrari puts an interesting spin on the idea of a piece consisting primarily of text directions, rather than conventional notation, by proscribing brief actions followed by comparatively longer periods of rest. The result is a composition that channels both the European avant-garde and the post-Cagean American experimental tradition; in particular, the early minimalists. Collard-Neven and Royer perform as well here as they do on the notated material. The composer worked closely with the two instrumentalists on the recording; thus, while the piece is notated as an "open form" work, its performance has Ferrari's fingerprints all over it. Long stretches of unchanging music -- primarily motoric ostinati -- are broken up by sudden surprise shifts. Rendered here, the piece's finale is a stirring crescendo of additional textures: percussive interjections, piano glissandi, frenetic passagework, and furious chords. "Tautologos III" defies minimalism's sometimes impoverished harmonic schema, all the while celebrating its use of inexorable pulse as a unifying device. It serves as a stirring finale for this multifaceted portrait of Ferrari's enigmatic and versatile creativity.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.