M.I.A. - "Borders" (Singles Going Steady)

M.I.A.'s "Borders" is an ultra-politicized, acid-tongued stomp that takes no prisoners.

Pryor Stroud: Corrugated with the same blazing-artillery rhetoric that mobs through the best M.I.A singles, "Borders" is an ultra-politicized, acid-tongued stomp that takes no prisoners, but its anti-institutional reformism is too scattershot to really hit any of the targets it hopes to bullseye: politics, values, identities, criminal justice, egocentrism, history as a whole. It's sawtoothed and bayonet sharp, with a lyric-hook right-to-southpaw combo featuring Mathangi's infamous guerrilla-style inflection, but it's frenzied aim leaves all of these systemic targets -- already massive, moving, and nearly impregnable anyway -- intact, without scars or dents or even much of a scratch to memorialize the song's assault. In this way, the insurgent kiss-off opening each chorus -- "Guns blow doors to the system / Yeah, fuck 'em when we say we're not with them" -- resounds more as a revolutionary preamble than a revolution itself: the doors are blown open, the entrenched systemic pathologies are there, vials to be smashed, but no one bothers to enter the room. [6/10]

Morgan Y. Evans: M.I.A. continues to be the dazzling and improbable light in freaky pop music, capable of just about anything. Her ability to champion other voices and inject vital current events commentary into this (to quote Marilyn Manson) "Great Big White World" is vital, all while being more casually fashionable and deadly on the mic than the majority of the pack. Her songs always include anthemic memorable elements and her videos often feel like a creative renaissance for the visual artform. "Borders" couldn't be a more timely reminder of the dangers of sound bite culture that narrows real people into categories and stereotypes. [10/10]

Chad Miller: Took me a while to get into, but there's actually a lot to love for a song that sounds so simplistic. This excellent production and backing tracks really assist the melody. And while hearing M.I.A. repeat "what's up with that" might seem a bit taxing, she makes her point brilliantly, setting first world concepts against the reality that refugees are faced with. Lines like "Love wins / What's up with that" take such a discrete jab at our hypocrisy. The whole song functions as a critique, but M.I.A. never has to come out and say exactly what she thinks. The structure and the lines do all the work for her. She knows sometimes the best way to make a point is to not make one at all. [8/10]

Emmanuel Elone: It has a great message and trap-style beat, but M.I.A.'s lyrics and voice are terribly annoying. The Auto-Tune is all over this song; she's suffering from some serious T-Pain syndrome. And, even though I like the moral of the song (basically to help and support immigrants and refugees), the only thing she says is list a bunch of random things (beliefs, families, religion, future) and say "What's up with that?", It didn't sound good at the beginning, and it's overbearing by the end. Still, M.I.A. does have a knack for making great, Timbaland-style beats as well as discussing topics that most artists aren't addressing in mainstream music. [5/10]

Steve Horowitz: The song is kind of meh. “What’s up with dat”, indeed, M.I.A., but the video that she directed is incredibly cool. The architecture of refugees creating a gunboat and posed on fences, cramming atop boats and laying so still, powerfully suggests the harm caused by doing nothing about the problems of refugees. The imagery may be heavy handed, but it works better than the song in artistically conveying what borders mean to those outside of them. [7/10]

Chris Ingalls: Admittedly, I'm not familiar with much of M.I.A.'s music, but this seems to be pretty much in line with what we expect from her. A solid, contemporary beat paired up with an exotic arrangement and instrumentation. Nice message. Brash, lots of swagger. Throw a "fuck 'em" in the chorus. Drop the mic, move on. I'm digging it. [7/10]

Adolf Alzuphar: This song is loudness at its best. It has both attitude and message and what a great title for a song sung by a singer who has spent her life breaking down borders. Death to all claustrophobic man made walls. [8/10]

SCORE: 7.29

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.