The Manic Street Preachers: Lifeblood

Jon Garrett

While far from a smashing return to form on par with Everything Must Go (their career high-water mark), Lifeblood should reassure the public that the Manics are not yet artistically bankrupt.

Manic Street Preachers


Label: Sony Music UK
US Release Date: Available as import
UK Release Date: 2004-11-01

The Manic Street Preachers, along with Supergrass, are perhaps the most bizarre non-success stories of the past 10 years. When Radiohead's Floydian prog scored an unexpected breakthrough in 1997, many predicted that the Manics (as they are called) would be the next UK act to be embraced by the U.S. charts. Even the band themselves seemed convinced, releasing the panoramically expansive This Is My Truth, Tell Me Yours -- a sprawling, grandiose album packed with politically-charged yet strikingly universal themes. Like Radiohead, The Manics were a British band that didn't seem to reflexively cling to its national origin, giving many hope of an imminent UK musical renaissance.

But Radiohead's Stateside success would prove to be an anomaly, as The Manics' chart triumph never came. Instead, the band that packed stadiums in their home country barely filled U.S. clubs to capacity. There was something profoundly sad about seeing the Manics performing their windswept epics in the close confines of the Chicago Metro on their U.S. tour in support of the album. Their domestic label, Virgin, apparently agreed, pulling all promotional dollars for the follow-up, the spectacular artistic wipeout that was Know Your Enemy.

Expectations were appropriately lowered for Lifeblood, yet the stakes were higher than ever. The Manics risked complete irrelevance with another dud as well as the prospect of becoming the insularly British band they had never wanted to be. How ironic that the group who once claimed they'd quit after their first album now stood within a stone's throw of dad-rock posterboys.

While far from a smashing return to form on par with Everything Must Go (their career high-water mark), Lifeblood should reassure the public that the Manics are not yet artistically bankrupt. To reclaim some of their past glories, the Manics delve into history -- albeit not to relive it. The ethereal synths subtly hint at what the lyrics make explicit: Bradfield, Wire, & Moore are in an '80s state of mind. Some will no doubt label them revivalists and shameless nostalgia-peddlers. Blatant namechecks of Morrissey and Marr and songs with titles like "Glasnost" and "1985" certainly provide fodder for the accusers.

But Lifeblood plays more like a eulogy than a tribute. There's an overwhelming sadness to the proceedings, as if the Manics are bidding farewell to the decade that birthed their musical heroes and shaped their sound. "A Song for Our Departure" and "Empty Souls", with their spare Doves-ish piano lines and Bradfield's mournful wail, find the Manics striking an unusually personal note. Unlike Truth, which never opted for subtle gestures when grand ones were possible, Lifeblood prefers more modest, minor shadings. The change suits them well. Bradfield, whose voice has never sounded more assured or earnest, complements his newfound range with increasingly expressive guitar work. Nowhere is this better exemplified than on "To Repel Ghosts", which easily ranks among the top five post-Richey tracks the band has released. (For those Stateside readers who might be unfamiliar, Richey James was the band's second guitarist before he abruptly disappeared prior to the recording of Everything Must Go.)

Lifeblood's melodic melancholia, aptly described by Wire as "elegiac pop", mostly works; however, their heavily-produced sound occasionally drifts into the maudlin. "Emily" is an especially egregious offender with its new-age keyboards and unintentionally hilarious lyrics ("Emily, a simple word called liberty"). Likewise, it's hard to imagine treacle like "Cardiffe Afterlife" slipping onto the album if not in the name of maintaining a consistent mood. Unfortunately, The Manics mistake deadening for sorrow.

Nonetheless, these small oversights hardly dwarf the band's accomplishments. The Manics, while perhaps not as essential as they were a decade ago, are carving out a new niche for themselves at a time when most bands have given up entirely on the creative process. Richey may be long dead, but there's still warm blood coursing through The Manics' veins. They are for real -- although maybe not in the way history had intended.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.