Comics

Marvel Zombies #1

William Gatevackes

How do you make brain dead, only thinking of feasting on human flesh, zombies sympathetic enough to support a series?

Marvel Zombies #1

Publisher: Marvel Comics
Contributors: Sean Phillips (Artist), June Chung (Artist)
Price: $2.99
Writer: Robert Kirkman
Item Type: Comic
Length: 32
Publication Date: 2006-02
Amazon

Zombies and comic books, notably Marvel Comics, have a long and varied history together. In the 1950s, when superhero comics were in decline, horror comics ruled the racks. This was especially true of the comics put out by the precursor to Marvel, Atlas Comics. The idea of the dead coming back to life was a quick and easy recipe for horror stories. Whether they came back for revenge, because of some black magic, or for no reason at all, the zombie struck a primal cord of fear in the hearts of the comic-reading youths of the 1950s.

Unfortunately, these stories also struck fear in the hearts of many adults, too. Most notably Dr. Frederick Wertham, a psychiatrist who tried to tie the gore and violence in the comic books of the day to juvenile delinquency in his book, Seduction of the Innocent. Congressional investigations into comics led by Senator Estes Kefauver soon followed.

The result of these hearings was the creation of the Comics Code Authority, a committee created by and made up of comic publishers, who instilled a Comic Code that everything that they published must follow. Part of the Code listed that "Scenes dealing with, or instruments associated with walking dead, torture vampires and vampirism, ghouls, cannibalism, and werewolfism are prohibited." This article of the Code put horror comics in general and zombies specifically, out of business for almost 20 years.

This lasted until 1971, when the Comics Code was adjusted slightly. The Code became more lenient, especially towards horror comics. The above article of the Code was adjusted to read "Scenes dealing with, or instruments associated with walking dead, or torture, shall not be used. Vampires, ghouls and werewolves shall be permitted to be used when handled in the classic tradition such as Frankenstein, Dracula, and other high calibre literary works written by Edgar Allen Poe, Saki, Conan Doyle and other respected authors whose works are read in schools around the world."

While vampires and werewolves were fair game, zombies were still banned. Marvel, who was experiencing success at the time with their Tomb of Dracula and Werewolf by Night books, came up with a way around this. They created characters called "Zuvembies". These characters looked liked zombies, acted like zombies and appeared to be zombies, but since they were named zuvembies, the Comic Code Authority was none the wiser (if only censors were that dense today).

By 1989, the Comics Code changed so that it barely resembled the Code of the 1950s. It became much looser and more forgiving. Zombies were no longer banned and Marvel retired the "zuvembie" name. Around the same time, the rabid, love-anything-put-out-by-Marvel fans got stuck with a disparaging nickname, one which they made their own as a symbol of pride for their devotion to the company. The nickname they were called was Marvel Zombies.

All of which brings us to Marvel Zombies, the new mini-series from Marvel. Not only is the word "zombie" proudly listed on the cover, the amount of gore inside would have made Wertham faint.

Marvel Zombies is a spin-off from an arc in Ultimate Fantastic Four. The Ultimate Reed Richards makes contact with a Reed Richards of an alternate dimension. Unfortunately, in this dimension, a virus from outer space caused all the Marvel heroes to become undead and crave human flesh. Reed Richards of this zombie world was searching alternate dimensions to replenish the diminishing food supply in his reality. Only with the help of the mutant Magneto, the last remaining non-zombified superhuman, does the Ultimate Reed Richards make his escape back to his own dimension.

Marvel Zombies picks up exactly where the Ultimate Fantastic Four books end. Magneto has destroyed the portal that brought the Ultimate Reed to this dimension at a great cost to himself. Exhausted and hurt, Magneto is set upon by Captain America, Giant Man, Spider-man and many other zombie heroes. How does it end for Magneto? Not well.

Writer Robert Kirkman, no stranger to zombies due to his work on Image's The Walking Dead, is faced with a difficult challenge. Whereas in The Walking Dead he tells the story of human survivors and their struggle with the zombies, in Marvel Zombies, the main characters ARE the zombies. How do you make brain dead, only thinking of feasting on human flesh, zombies sympathetic enough to support a series? Simple, don't make them brain dead.

The main problem with how these characters were presented in Ultimate Fantastic Four was that their bloodlust replaced the way you expect them to act. Marvel Zombies explains that as a side effect of their maddening hunger. After they have eaten, Kirkman allows their true personalities to show through. Spider-man is still as angst-filled as he is in the other books published by Marvel, only now instead of bemoaning his job or lack of social life, he is kvetching about eating Aunt May and Mary Jane.

The artwork by Sean Phillips is dark and dirty, suiting the subject matter excellently. He shows the gore, and there are buckets of it, in a way that is realistic enough to be shocking but cartoon-like so it is not completely repulsive. Kirkman balances pages of feeding frenzies with morbid humor, another horror tradition, which keeps the reader's interest.

When this series was announced on Marvel's schedule, one wondered how they could write enough story to cover five issues. Now, after reading the first issue, you hope that the story lasts longer. That is, if you're a fan of horror mixed with humor. If you, like Dr. Wertham, are turned off by excess gore, then you'd best keep moving down the comic rack.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image