Paul McCartney: Back in the U.S. Live 2002

Adrien Begrand

Paul Mccartney

Back in the U.S. Live 2002

Label: Capitol
US Release Date: 2002-11-26
UK Release Date: 2003-03-10

In 2002, Paul McCartney embarked on his first American tour since 1993, and in the time between tours, Paul's, er, sorry, Sir Paul's life has sure had its share of highs and lows. He released two quality albums of original material (1997's Flaming Pie and 2001's Driving Rain), his loving wife of nearly 30 years, Linda, died from breast cancer; he recorded a potent, cathartic album that featured covers of rock 'n' roll rarities; he recorded "Freedom", a shallow, pandering, jingoistic jingle that marks his nadir as an artist; and he married former model Heather Mills. After such a tough time following Linda's passing, getting back out on the road seemed like the best thing for the now 60-year-old McCartney to do.

That tour seemed to ignite something in the guy; the performances on his new live album, Back in the U.S. have Macca sounding better than he has in years. Out of all four Beatles, Paul was the one who loved being onstage. He was the member most affected by the group's decision to concentrate on studio recording; he's the consummate performer, his best work always coming from onstage. Back in the U.S. is actually his third live album since 1989 (1989's Tripping the Live Fantastic and 1993's Paul Is Live being the others), and like the other two, it has McCartney bringing out the usual standards from the Beatles, Wings, and solo catalogs, as well as a handful of new tracks and some nice surprises thrown in. The set is weighed heavily toward Beatles material, and on the new album, 21 out of the 36 songs come from Paul's earliest days.

There's no such thing as a bad McCartney performance, but what separates Back in the U.S. from the rest of McCartney's live albums is the strength of his backing band. Instead of surrounding himself with marginally talented musicians who hover in the shadows, he instead chose to go onstage with a younger crew, and the performances on the album have more of a youthful spark to them as a result. Guitarists Rusty Anderson and Brian Ray prove more than capable at handling all the classic riffs and solos, while hefty drummer Abe Laboriel Jr. is an all-out ace behind his kit, combining raw power with feeling. Paul "Wix" Wickens, who has been playing live with McCartney since 1989, is Macca's secret weapon, ingenuously recreating myriad horns, strings, and piano licks on his synths.

The Beatles tunes, of course, are great. The requisite tunes like "All My Loving", "Back in the U.S.S.R.", "Can't Buy Me Love", "Let It Be", "Hey Jude", "The Long and Winding Road", and "Yesterday" all deliver the goods, but it's the little surprises that provide the most fun. "Hello Goodbye" joyously opens the set, "Getting Better" gets its first live treatment in over 30 years, "Mother Nature's Son" is lovely, as is "The Fool on the Hill", Paul's ukulele version of George Harrison's "Something" is touching, and the set closing medley of "Sgt. Pepper (Reprise)" and "The End" has Paul, Anderson, and Ray trading solo licks, while Laboriel goes totally nuts on his drums. McCartney adds a facetious touch to the somber "Carry That Weight" by singing at one point, " . . . and this is the bit where I don't know the words but I don't even think I'm going to bother to try and learn them before the end of the tour," without losing a beat. Yeah, it's contrived, but it's cute.

As for the Wings and solo material, it's a mix between the brilliant, the corny, and the stupid. "Band on the Run", "Let Me Roll It", and the deliriously dumb "Jet" are a blast to hear, "Live and Let Die" simply roars, while "Every Night" and "Maybe I'm Amazed" sound as emotional as their original versions. Meanwhile, the syrupy "My Love" and such atrocities as "C Moon" and "Coming Up" will please diehard fans only. Driving Rain's "Your Loving Flame" sounds like it belongs with all the other songs, but that awful "Freedom" rears its ugly head late in the album, threatening to ruin all the fun.

Back in the U.S. embodies some of the better elements of live albums, but also a few of the negatives as well. Another reason Back in the U.S. comes close to being completely derailed is thanks to some rather questionable editing tactics. Anyone who has seen a McCartney show know how much fun is had, how Paul loves to connect with the audience, always providing interesting onstage banter, but on this album, all that's edited out. During his concerts, he touchingly dedicated songs to Harrison, John Lennon, Linda, and Heather, but we hear none of it. As a result, although the performances are excellent, you hear no interaction with the fans (aside from the requisite, and cringe-inducing "audience participation portion of "Hey Jude"), and McCartney almost sounds like an aloof artist who doesn't acknowledge his fans at all, which we all know just isn't the case. If the songs didn't sound so good, the album would have been ruined.

But in the end, we still have a very good, two hours' worth of live Paul McCartney music to enjoy. He's getting on in years, and has a tougher time hitting the higher notes (like on "Maybe I'm Amazed"), but he's still giving it his all, and that's all we could ask for.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.