Meg Baird: Dear Companion

Meg Baird (Espers, the Baird Sisters) wows with a simple, stripped-down folk record that peels off the psych-, freak-, and anti- labels and lets them float away on the breeze.

Meg Baird

Dear Companion

Label: Drag City
US Release Date: 2007-05-22
UK Release Date: 2007-05-22

When all of the psych-, freak-, and anti- qualifiers are stripped away, the heart of those movements (ideally) is just good old, plain folk: music meant to be shared, handed down, and participated in. The sonic accoutrements that make bands like Meg Baird’s Espers so delightful can send critics and audiences into fits of incense-steeped reveries, but the lineage of “Byss & Abyss”, for example, is as much “Greensleeves” as it is The 5000 Spirits or the Layers of an Onion, if not more. Baird’s solo debut for Drag City, Dear Companion, further exposes the link between Jean Ritchie and Vashti Bunyan that should be a hell of a lot more obvious than it often is.

Dear Companion peels away those onion layers with a set of traditionals, covers, and a couple ringer originals, often arranged with just a single guitar and Baird’s sweet and unaffected voice. In an age when everything and the kitchen sink are thrown at even the simplest of songs, the starkness of the album belies confidence not only in the material, but in the potential for the most basic of presentations to still connect with listeners. The lilting title track, for instance, is showcased twice—once with a rolling, fingerpicked accompaniment, once a cappella. Though both versions are skeletal when in comparison to much of today’s hyphenated fare, each displays a keen awareness of how to effectively and efficiently communicate a song. Baird sings the former with little vocal ornamentation, only the most subtle vibrato rippling her clear tone. On the latter however, she ratchets up a key or two, gently twanging her vowels to bring the song closer to its Appalachian derivations.

The other traditional folk songs on the album are given the same faithful, uncluttered treatment. “Sweet William and Fair Ellen” finds Baird strumming a dulcimer while navigating the song’s unique rhythmic structure; “Willie O’Winsbury” pairs the exquisitely melancholy of the Scottish ballad’s melody with a jangling, hammer-on filled guitar pattern. Best perhaps is Baird’s interpretation of “The Cruelty of Barbary Allen”, a song covered by everyone from Seeger to Dylan, Colin Meloy to freaking John Travolta. Throughout the song’s six-plus minutes and umpteen verses, Baird keeps the song and story compelling through judicious use of double-tracked vocals, and a warm, rambling guitar arrangement.

Baird’s own two compositions, were it not for the liner note credits, would be nearly indistinguishable from the public domain tunes, although “Riverhouse in Tinicum” betrays a slightly more modern fingerstyle pattern with its half-stepping bass notes. “Maiden in the Moor Lay” is a shimmering and bittersweet ballad, adding angelic harmonies on a wordless, key-shifting chorus. Each is an exciting example of Baird’s ability to work creatively within the style, but it’s the handful of contemporary covers that ultimately sets Dear Companion apart from other recent, reverent, and lovely folk albums. “River Song”, by New Zealand’s Chris Thompson, is a highlight of the album, a haunting, dulcimer-strummed number, as is “The Waltze of the Tennis Players”, which sports a hop-along gait and a sweet sense of humor, as one unfaithful lover says to another, “Constance, what a name / You should have said ‘Felicity’”. It’s a small dose of levity in the middle of an album that plays it pretty straight.

It’s a heartening development that young artists are turning more and more to timeless material for inspiration, making connections as Baird does between Jimmy Webb (and the New Riders of the Purple Sage) and the unknown author(s) of “Barbary Allen”. It’s even more heartening when such an album is executed without a dash of pretension or Puritanism, just a collection of songs and stories meant to be a dear and longtime companion, not a freak-psych-anti-trend or accessory.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.