Melrose Place - The Complete First Season

Noah Davis

To jump or not to jump? For these shows, that is the question.

Melrose Place - The Complete First Season

Distributor: Paramount
Cast: Thomas Calabro, Josie Bissett, Courtney Thorne-Smith, Andrew Shue, Doug Savant, Vanessa A. Williams, Amy Locane, Heather Locklear
Network: Fox
First date: 1992
US Release Date: 2006-11-07

Beverly Hills 90210 – The Complete First Season

Distributor: Paramount
Cast: Jason Priestley, Shannen Doherty, Luke Perry, Tori Spelling, Jennie Garth, Ian Ziering, Gabrielle Carteris, Brian Austin Green
Network: Fox
First date: 1990
US Release Date: 2006-11-07

With The O.C. in ruins, teen melodrama on TV couldn't be in a more precarious position. Not so long ago, however, it was thriving. High schoolers, their older siblings, and parents tuned in by the millions to watch Beverly Hills 90210 and Melrose Place.

Both 90210, which debuted in '90, and Melrose, first aired in 1992, provide a snapshot into the same early '90s period. The characters on the latter show are marginally older -- in a bit of cross-promotion, Kelly (Jennie Garth) and Jake (Grant Show) are romantically linked in early episodes of Melrose -- but in both places, the clothes are silly, the slang ridiculous, and the irony absent.

Still, the kids in West Beverly possess a certain timelessness missing in the "young adults" of Melrose. 90210 is still syndicated in 14 countries, while Melrose is only available on Paramount's new DVD. Given that they were both created, executive produced, and sometimes written by Darren Star, the scripts are equally solid, and the actors similarly talented and beautiful, there must be some other explanation of the difference in their fates.

One possibility is the combination of dialogue and characters. It's less grating when teenaged David (Brian Austin Green) explains, "That's what happens when your parents get divorced: your dad lets you do incredibly stupid things because he only gets to see you on weekends," than when young professional Michael (Thomas Calabro) worries that his wife Jane (Josie Bissett) is "insinuating that [he's] not fulfilling [his] husbandly duties." The struggle to pay rent -- especially at the glamorous apartments at 4616 Melrose Place -- is boring. High school drama is -- apparently -- endlessly entertaining.

Melrose Place deserves some credit for taking chances, addressing (or at least acknowledging) "issues" avoided by its predecessor. An African American character, Rhonda (Vanessa A. Williams), lives in the apartment complex, while the only minority characters in West Beverly were chauffeurs, bouncers, and valets. Casting only takes you so far, though: Rhonda's dialogue tended toward the stereotypical ("Allison's new roommate has got it goin' on!") and her storylines were minimal. She was gone by the second season.

The show also cast Doug Savant as Matt, an out gay man. It was considered a bold step in '92. In an interview with, Star asserts, "I think it was an enormous milestone. I don't think anybody had seen a character like that -- an unapologetic, out gay character that had self respect for who he was." The creator may be correct –- Matt at least partially paved the way for Will, Ellen, and others -– but he wasn't very compelling. The network made sure he didn't have a sex life, censoring his only kissing scene, and he played the "best friend" role throughout the show's 10-year run.

Neither box set breaks new ground with special features. They come packed with extras, but most are superfluous. Today, everyone documents their backstage activities with an eye toward the DVD releases down the road. Back then, no one thought to record daily activities or interview cast and crew members. The Melrose Place and 90210 "Behind-The-Scenes" or "new Style" featurettes do nothing to elucidate the production process, only observe surfaces. Would anyone complain if the complete first season came sans "Meet the Class of West Beverley High?" Probably not. Fans will be content just to have the episodes collected on discs.

In the pilot episode of Melrose Place, four people are thrown in the pool. In Beverly Hills, the kids jump in voluntarily. The difference suggests that the grown-ups need a "shove" to have fun, while kids "just do it". 90210 was an enjoyable, occasionally provocative drama about the lives of beautiful people. The cast of Melrose were down-on-their-luck, horny losers who just happened to be beautiful. No one wants to be thrown in the pool; we all want to jump. 90210 showed us how.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.