Reviews

Mendy (2006)

Erik Hinton

Mendy is virtuosic in bursts but unable to bear the weight of a full length running time.


Mendy

Director: Adam Vardy
Cast: Deana Barone, Elizabeth Cano, Kristen Cecala, Spencer Chandler, Gabriela Dias
Distributor: Lifesize Entertainment
MPAA rating: Unrated
Studio: Intuit
First date: 2006
US DVD Release Date: 2007-03-13

Despite the many boons (cost, flexibility, et al) of digital video vis-à-vis independent filmmaking, this new cinema medium possesses one glaring drawback. In epochs past, new directors had to use film, an inherently expensive format, when creating their first works as it was the only option they had when producing movies. Maiden voyages to the silver screen were limited by small budgets and, thus, rookie filmmakers had to resort to the short film. Relegated to one reel their faculties were rigorously honed until they were ready for the feature length.

Roman Polanski made the 20-minute Two Men and a Wardrobe before Rosemary’s Baby, Martin Scorsese began with six-minute The Big Shave before graduating to Mean Streets; indeed most prominent directors began with making short films. However, with the maddeningly cheap price point of digital video, new directors may dive forthright into feature-length filmmaking. Of course, this move is often premature, their skill sets having not yet been properly trained and what the viewers are left with is unripe talent spread too thin across 90-minutes of video. This is precisely the ailment from which first-time director Adam Vardy’s 90-minute digital feature, Mendy, suffers.

Mendy relates the tale of the eponymous protagonist, a young Jewish man attempting to resolve the tenants of his strict Hasidic Judaism with the hypermodern secular nexus of New York City. Mendy, undergoing a spiritual crisis spawned by sexual impropriety, leaves his Brooklyn shtetl (a small Jewish community) to live with his Judaism-lapsed childhood friend Yankel. Hoping through experience of the unsheltered city to find grounding with which he may reconcile the tenants of his orthodox upbringing with the pressures of present-day New York, Mendy is, instead, introduced by Yankel into a miasma of drugs, promiscuity, and moral decay. His faith is tested and, although he never relinquishes his belief in God, he does exhibit spiritual fragility by breaking from the edicts of his Hasidic sect and cutting his side curls, engaging in intercourse with a non-Jewish woman (a shiksa), and trafficking ecstasy for a Jewish dealer.

Also living with Yankel is the Brazilian dancer and barmaid, Bianca. Mendy initially evaluates Bianca as vile because of her shiksa status and her past as a stripper. However, Mendy’s instinctual repugnance to secularity is overcome by Bianca’s compassionate demeanor and eventual introduction of Mendy to her modern choreography and dance. Bianca and Yankel serve as the two disparate, yet not antipodal, sources of Mendy’s re-education as he attempts to navigate his faith outside his insular Jewish community.

The overarching milieu of the film is spectacular; Adam Vardy and his co-writer Heshey Schnitzler adroitly tow a fine line between preachy discourse and dramatic throw-away-your-Torahs plunge into secularity. The duo manages to write a screenplay which carefully depicts the fullness of spiritual turmoil without featuring a protagonist full of reactionary anger at his outmoded religion.

However, while strong on a supra-structural level, the film highlights the artistic shortcomings of a new director who thinly stretches limited resources (both financial and aesthetic) over feature length. Mendy’s dialogue is often staid, the small-talk of the cast painfully reminiscent of the wooden scripts of grade school foreign language textbooks. Ironically, the screenwriting is most organic in the theological interchanges between Mendy and his two roommates. Mendy’s script is representative of the film in general: virtuosic in bursts but unable to bear the weight of a full length running time.

The cinematography further displays Vardy’s directorial overreaching. The first sequence in the film is a low angle tracking shot of Mendy running through a train station. While seeking to engender the “indie” aspect of the long tracking shot (see Anderson, Baumbach, etc.) the scene instead suggests a film that is rough around the edges. Steadicams and dollies are either eschewed or poorly employed and thus the frame bounces noticeably, detrimentally branding the film as an amateur endeavor. The camera for much of the film is offensively handheld, a cinematographic choice which reads as not an auteur move, but rather, the product of directorial flaccidity or indolence. Such weak elements bar the audience from engaging the rich film world, distanced in the manner in which one is when viewing a home movie.

It bears mentioning that Mendy does not completely fail in the technical arena. Again, when Mendy embraces its low-budget and rookie aspect rather than grandstanding a display of roughshod overreaching, the film is its strongest. The credit sequence and successive sequences of Mendy in the airport smuggling drugs are composed of grainy still photos in a fashion remarkably similar to Chris Marker’s La Jetée. This method was clearly a work-around for the cost and difficulties of airport filmmaking and it functions beautifully. Mendy accepts the inabilities imposed upon it and the film succeeds. Furthermore, towards the end of the film, Mendy attends a mikvah (bathhouse) for ritualistic purification. He submerges himself repeatedly and the camera remains stationary. There is a comely symmetry to the shot and the cinematographic simplicity is a perfect fit.

Had Mendy been a much shorter film, a condensation entirely possible with its straightforward plot, and had the director realized his limitations, the spiritual strength of the piece would have been magical. However, Vardy and Scnitzler’s subtle and able mastery of theological struggle is unfortunately diluted by Mendy’s feature length and Vardy’s directorial puerility.

Mendy’s special features include a trailer, a rather uninspired “music video” live performance by The Sway Machinery, and a very appropriate interview with co-writer Heshey Schnitzler. The interview is a pleasure to watch, explicating Jewish tradition and philosophy in an extremely cogent fashion.

5

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image