M.I.A.: 27 September 2007 - Sydney

Dan Raper

PopMatters' Dan Raper offers a comparative study in Bamboo bangin' past and present.



City: Sydney, Australia
Venue: The Forum
Date: 2007-09-27

Then: 7 August 2005

The setting was Central Park, a hot afternoon in late summer. We had lined up at 11am to see M.I.A. DJ Rakha, a ridiculous Mr. Vegas, and Diplo had all performed and, as five o'clock came and went, the crowd was beginning to get antsy. Diplo came onstage and said, "I know you guys want M.I.A., but I'm going to be playing for an hour, so deal with it," and, though his set was filled with agreeably mashed sounds, most of us were sitting on picnic rugs, wilting in the heat, and only slightly thrilled by the occasional celebrity sighting (Salman Rushdie, Natalie Portman).

The day had become heat-soaked, burned-out, exhausted. Shadows were lengthening across Summerstage by the time M.I.A. appeared, so it’s perhaps not unexpected that we viewed her through a kind of haze -- the screams and dancing a mechanical reaction to Maya Arulpragasam's exhortations. She went through the motions of a hip-hop star -- jumping around the stage, doing the hand gestures, asking for re-ups. Her hypewoman (still with her today) strutted around like a proud hen, neck extended forward and up, her muscular body pumping to the music.

But, somehow, it all seemed a little forced. On the stage, cardboard cut-outs of a tiger and a helicopter referenced do-it-yourself, outsider fashion. I got the impression of a good Sri Lankan girl, emboldened by the decorations and her thick stage makeup. The performance was spirited, if not perfect, and though M.I.A. covered up the restarts with calls for more noise from the crowd, it was pretty clear the real reason for the disjointed flow: She was attempting to re-calibrate the terms on which we interact with party music. In this she wasn't entirely successful -- but you know what? We didn't care. Her amateurism was charming, and her beats still struck with the strange and addictive quality of Arular's music.

Now: 28 September 2007

A lot has changed in two years. The excitement over Arular has come and gone and is now being replaced (escalated?) by an excellent sophomore effort. Kala broadens the scope of M.I.A.'s influences without sacrificing the accessibility and addictive hooks of the debut. The album's positive critical reception has been bolstered here in Australia by a consistently strong presence on radio: first "Bird Flu", then "Boyz", now "Paper Planes".

So it wasn't a surprise that the relatively small venue that M.I.A. booked for her Sydney show sold out quickly. The Forum is bigger than it looks, due to three levels of balconies and covered wings that extend out into the walls while still offering a fairly good view of stage. But the effect from a performer's perspective must be one of intimacy, and that gives shows at this new venue an added kick: You see artists visibly rising to the occasion. Even with that knowledge, M.I.A.'s show often seemed larger than this venue could contain; if she's not quite ready for stadiums, she's certainly heading in that direction.

Concerts in Australia are hampered by logistics: The expense of flying artists over means that ticket prices for international acts are invariably more than $50. So the crowd self-selects, fans' passions escalating in proportion to the ticket prices. The packed Forum Theatre in Sydney reflected M.I.A.'s expanded fan base: guys in orange mesh wife-beaters; girls in glow-in-the-dark, fluoro dresses; guys dressed as if out of Dragonball Z; and big Samoan couples who, when they danced, shook the floorboards. And, oh, did they dance.

What M.I.A. brought to this eclectic mix was a fully formed stage persona (there's no way she could have done that two years earlier). Bursting on stage to the recognizable beats of "Bamboo Banger", she looked like a disco monster -- an impression largely informed by her metallic hoodie, which grinned with huge cutout triangles of teeth. Throughout the course of the show, she threw off her hood to reveal a baseball cap with attached bat (she flapped it sillily during the intro to "Paper Planes"), a pair of ridiculous ’80s sunglasses, and her wavy hair, either down over or swept across her face. Her hypewoman may have been the same, but for cardboard cutouts M.I.A. has substituted flashing, epileptic videos and a strutting bravado. She fell backwards into the outstretched arms of the crowd until security got visibly nervous, and then she invited "ladies only" up onto the stage for an oddly carnival-esque rendition of "URAQT".

Bass was boosted to fill the theatre, but -- as you expect from this kind of music -- little was changed in the songs themselves. As a result Afrikan Boy's verse in "Hussel", played straight from CD, fell predictably flat. But other little flourishes spiced up the performance: the seamless move from "Sunshowers" to "$20" (a bruising highlight); the call for crowd participation in a raucous rendition of "Happy Birthday" for Low B, the DJ; the exuberant reinterpretations of "Sweet Dreams" and, to the crowd's delight, "We Are Your Friends". Between all that, M.I.A. really didn't have to mess with much to evince an elated response from the crowd. Her hits thrilled -- simple as that -- and the rest of her material was pulled off with a mostly polished professionalism.

With all the performance experience she's gained over the past few years, M.I.A. has grown into an exhilarating and -- maybe more importantly -- an incredibly fun performer. There's little sense any more of M.I.A. trying to convince people of a certain political message or of being true to outsider viewpoints. Instead, she's bringing the many different sounds of outsider cultures together, transforming them into music that's an undeniable pleasure. For once, it's possible to not feel guilty about that.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.