The Mighty Imperials: Thunder Chicken

Stefan Braidwood

The Mighty Imperials

Thunder Chicken

Label: Daptone
US Release Date: 2004-10-19
UK Release Date: 2004-10-05

Boy, do I wish I'd been in the studio for the recording of these hot little numbers. This album just glows with the feel of everybody involved being totally at ease yet reveling in a single, mutual groove; having fun, testing their limits, competing a little, and above all playing their balls off. I popped this on for the first time at about 10:30 on a rainy Bristol morning, and didn't stop grinning until about 8:00 that night. At which point I put it on again.

Quite frankly, I feel the best way to communicate the contents of Thunder Chicken would be to fulfill my word limit by simply writing FUNKY about 600 times (perhaps in a variety of fonts, with the odd interjection of YEAH!). However, as this would be unlikely to meet the stringent intellectual strictures imposed upon my feeble witterings by our beloved editor, maythesunshineevercaresshersaintlybrow, I'm going to have to employ needlessly refined and elaborate things like sentences. There was nothing needlessly refined or elaborate about the Mighty Imperials, though. They were kinda funky. You get my drift.

What makes all of this even more impressive is that irrepressible grooves were put to wax before the foursome's aforementioned balls had even dropped properly. Sean Solomon, guitarist and provider of those itchy hot, curling licks, Nick Movshon, whose bass playing struts and bounces where others' fears to walk, Leon Michaels, Hammond organist of joyful abandon, and Homer "The Bull" Steinweiss, whose drums must afterwards have resembled the impact zone of a belly-flopping hippo; none of these distressingly talented musicians had yet reached the decrepit sum of 17 years at the time of these sessions, recorded in the now sadly defunct Desco Records studio, NY, just before AD turned 2000. Sounds like they wanted to party like Prince said they should, only as a band, and on record.

They are joined by former gospel singer Joseph "Who's the King" Henry for several tracks, and some juicy horns are added into the mix on occasion, but the majority of these 40 minutes are simply the sound of the preternaturally attuned foursome taking the instrumental cornerstones of funk and giving them a good workout via their own compositions. You can almost hear the little blighters grinning to each other in heady euphoria as they jammed; the recording nice and raw to give the music that authentic gritty feel, yet, thanks to the modern production, blessedly fat in the bass and powerfully percussive (in comparison to the unhappily thin sound of many 60s funk bands, whose actual live impact must now forever be lost to us). I still wince every time the unfeasibly heavy break on "Jody's Walk" vandalises my pert little speakers.

Basically, what this amounts to is a looser take on the Memphis originals, a healthy portion of the Meters alongside greats like Rufus Thomas, and maybe touches of what the young Shuggie Otis was getting up to with his father's band when he himself was a barely pubescent firebrand: to paraphrase the record company, "raw-ass funk, heavy gut-bucket soul, or generally having a good time" that will "bring the listener back to the late '60s and early '70s when soul music was made with blood, sweat and [hah!] balls". I'm not quite so sure about them calling it "classic heavy funk", if only because that's surely tautological and its pendant paradoxical; who the hell wants to listen to "funk lite"?

This will be the first time Thunder Chicken has been legitimately released (it was bootlegged by a UK company, which might explain the sampling of the "Jody's Walk" break on a sneaky hip-hop track of my acquaintance). Sadly, if predictably, the quartet hasn't stuck together through the intervening limbo; splitting to attend university or joining groups like the Dap Kings and the Antibalas Afrobeat Orchestra. In a time when so much music is the result of session musicians tweaked with Pro Tools, it is truly a shocking waste that such an uninhibited, intuitive, gleeful group playing was stifled by red tape. Oh, to have been there in the studio when life smiled at them and they laughed back, because they knew: everything they were ever going to do was going to be funky, and they'd do it together.

The Mighty Imperials, wherever you are and whatever you're doing: I salute you. You guys were some mighty music magic, man.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.