Miles Davis: Miles Davis at Newport: 1955-1975: The Bootleg Series Vol. 4

With the fourth installment in the so-called bootleg series, the evolution of Miles Davis is on full display. To say these recordings are essential to understanding the artist’s progression would be an understatement.

Miles Davis

Miles Davis at Newport: 1955-1975: The Bootleg Series Vol. 4

Label: Columbia/Legacy
US Release Date: 2015-07-17
UK Release Date: 2015-07-17

Perhaps no other recording better illustrates how Miles Davis bridged the gap between jazz’s old guard and its younger visionaries than Miles Davis at Newport: 1955-1975: The Bootleg Series Vol. 4. Spanning 20 years in just under five hours of largely unreleased live performances, At Newport finds a young Miles seated among some of bop and post-bop’s biggest names. Disc one begins with a spoken introduction from Duke Ellington (who describes the group as “[living] in the realm Buck Rodgers is trying to reach”), the then-reigning king of jazz and swing. Traditionally minded and standing in stark contrast to where the music ends by the time it reaches the fourth disc, these recordings paint a picture of not only the evolution of an artistic genius, but also a broader cultural evolution, one in which the music largely mirrors the society within which it was created.

In his enlightening 1962 Playboy interview with Alex Haley, Davis expounded upon the rampant racism he faced throughout his career up to that point and how he had to essentially work to prevent it from impacting his music. In the recordings up through and until his monumental Bitches Brew, you can almost hear the simmering rage and intensity behind every precise note. Never a flashy soloist, though he certainly had the chops to unleash a furious flurry of notes should he so desire, his was a more measured take, one which explored the instrument’s tonal quality, allowing it to color the performance with an emotionality that sheets of sound often could not. Because of this approach, Davis’ early recordings appealed a wider audience (Kind of Blue being one of the best-selling jazz albums of all time). Above all, he played melodies; you could follow his train of thought, despite its unorthodox originality.

On “’Round Midnight,” here recorded with Thelonius Monk on piano, Davis takes a measured, thoughtful solo that has little in common with Monk’s far more idiosyncratic approach to his instrument. And yet together they serve as a near perfect foil, one complementing the other’s approach in a way that, within a separate context, might be missed. Similarly, when paired with the West Coast cool of Gerry Mulligan on Charlie Parker’s “Now’s The Time,” Davis stands out as a distinct voice, one not adhering to any one stylistic school in particular, his tone as much informed by those who’ve come before as the sounds in his head.

What is most striking about listening to his early performances within a chronological context contrasted with his electric period is how consistent he remains as a performer; his confidence clearly increasing as the number and frequency of notes begins decreasing. Never one to over indulge in note-y solos, the gaps between statements increases as the years progress, not out of any sort of studied defiance, but more out of an interest in the sounds that exist between the sounds; those silent moments that allow for the ghosts of phrases to gradually die off, creating a sort of tension between the past and present that allows for the performer’s imagination to run wild.

“It isn’t the instrument being played that makes the difference, but the man who plays it,” states Willis Connover, paraphrasing Duke Ellington in describing Davis as a performer. Hearing the band that recorded Kind of Blue slowly introduced before launching into a brief set is liable to raise goose bumps, the anticipation building as one of the greatest jazz combos ever tears into a frenetic set of standards and soon-to-be standards. It is here that Davis’ approach to soloing is best on display. Where the head of “Ah-Leu-Cha” features a frantic unison line, Davis brings everything back on his solo, taking a far more measured, almost introspective approach to his performance that stands in sharp contrast to the piece’s opening moments. By contrast, John Coltrane’s trademark “sheets of sound” dominate the whole of his solo section, while Cannonball Adderly follows a similar approach with nimble dexterity. Hearing these iconic performers together within a live setting is a revelation.

Noticeably, throughout these performances there is the lack of Davis the person. Never once does he address the audience. Instead, his presence is represented solely through his horn. In speaking with Haley, Davis attributed this not to a rudeness or surly personal demeanor, but rather to his being aware of his role as a musician and artist and, in as much, his sole purpose being to perform, to express himself through his horn in a way that feels far truer than any stage banter ever could.

As the years progress, the music becomes more and more chaotic. Yet while the music rages, his performances becomes more impressionistic, the aural equivalent of flinging paint onto canvas. By the time we hear the {Bitches Brew}-era bands, he has nearly abandoned lyrical phrases altogether in favor an emotionally charged sound and feel that strives to move past the traditional notion of jazz soloing and into more of a frenetic, rock-oriented approach to the music. Tearing down the status quo, he nearly singlehandedly reinvents the genre, bringing in younger, more adventurous players who, having been weaned on rock and R&B, are able to follow his artistic vision and replicate the sounds inside Davis’ head.

His sound here on the collection’s latter half loses the subtle, precision present on those earlier performances in favor of a rawer, more visceral approach to the instrument that reflects not only a shifting attitude towards the music, but also one rooted in the extreme social changes taking place at the time. As the 1960s wear on, the music takes on an almost angry quality, filled with a simmering rage that makes the listener feel something more than just an appreciation for the technical virtuosity of the myriad jazz legends on display on this set. Rather the sound and feel of these performances begin to take precedent over the tunes themselves, melody becoming secondary to aural exploration and emotionally charged statements that deal more viscerally than anything heard before.

This transition becomes most apparent on the jump between his classic mid-to-late-‘60s quintet featuring Wayne Shorter, Tony Williams, Herbie Hancock, and Ron Carter to the young, largely unknown players assembled for the pre-Bitches Brew/In a Silent Way-era recordings. Where the former’s sound is still largely rooted in the post-bop idiom, with classics such as “’Round Midnight” and “So What” given a fairly tradition, albeit sped up in the case of the latter, reading, by “Miles Runs the Voodoo Down,” a clear change in direction is in the air. Here the drumming becomes far more frantic, electric piano can be heard and Davis himself is far more immersed in the sound and feel than inherent melodicism. This is jazz designed to get the people moving in a way they hadn’t in some time. By no means inaccessible, this is still a decidedly avant-garde approach to the music.

By the time they hit “Turnaroundphrase,” a mere decade and a half removed from the first disc’s performances, the group assembled is in full-on eclectic electric mode. Here Davis employs two guitarists, auxiliary percussionist Mtume, electric bass and saxophone, drums and, himself going electric, the wah effect that would come to define the majority of his early ‘70s recordings. Polarizing and divisive to jazz purists, these sounds represented a fearless new direction informed as much by the youth culture as the social upheaval within which it was conceived. It could be argued that at no other time in the history of popular music did the music itself play such a role in both shaping the culture and being shaped by culture in return.

Standing in sharp contrast with the 1950s performances, these recordings are furious, emotionally charged and borderline unhinged. It’s an exhilarating contrast that, when listened through start to finish, charts the creative journey of a true musical genius. By album’s end, Ellington’s opening words seem to have come true: Davis and company have found themselves inhabiting a sonic world only Buck Rodgers could’ve imagined.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.