Moon Taxi Marries Person and Professional On 'Daybreaker'

Once known primarily for its live shows, Moon Taxi continues its glide toward become an established--and memorable--studio band.

Moon Taxi


Label: Vagrant / BMG
US Release Date: 2015-10-02

“It feels like our entire career has been on the road,” says guitarist Trevor Terndrup of Nashville’s Moon Taxi. Even if he were a man given to exaggeration Terndrup’s assessment isn’t that far off the mark. Since coming together in 2006 the quintet has performed over a thousand shows. Terndrup would probably be the first to say that he lives for the thrill of playing live but admits that the group started honing its studio and songwriting chops a few years ago in the hopes that fans could better appreciate the two worlds Moon Taxi occupies.

"It was really when we put out Cabaret (2012) that we started focusing on putting out records we could really be proud of,” he says, and adds, “We poured our hearts into this record.”

It shows. The band's new release, Daybreaker, is the portrait of a band that's moving forward by leaps and bounds.

Whether songs such as the dance floor number “All Day All Night”, the country-tinged “Run Right Back”, or the anthemic album opener “Year Zero”, it’s clear that this is a band that’s committed to offering fans the ultimate listening experience in the space of the album’s eleven songs.

There are moments of sonic density—parts of truly catchy songs—that require and reward deep listening, times when more than a little fleck of gospel music finds its way into the mix or a moment or two when you can’t tell if you’re listening to a contemporary or classic rock band. For Terndrup and his bandmates—Spencer Thompson, Wes Bailey, Tyler Ritter and Tommy Putnam—that was the point.

“It’s about producing sounds that you might not necessarily achieve in a live setting,” he says. “We had time to consider what elements would make for the best songs. But playing that stuff live is different. Something that’s great in the studio might not translate live. But in the studio you get a chance to take a step back, take an extra listen. I do enjoy that but I’m more of a live, spontaneous performer. It’s fortunate that we have some great, patient people in the band who help me to step back and take an overall listen to what takes place in the studio.”

In the season of the song, when some writers and even musicians themselves are championing the single and the EP and steering clear of the expensive-to-produce album, Terndrup says his band is keen to keep the album as art form alive.

“I really appreciate people who take the time to digest a full album. I’m that way as well. I don’t think that it’s a dying breed,” he says. “I think there are people out there who only have that one single on their iTunes and listen to that all the time. But I think making albums is something that we’ve always wanted to do. We’re record guys. We want to make great, cohesive works.”

In keeping with the theme of cohesion, a number of songs on the new record focus on life on and off the road and the guitarist/vocalist says that the band members were aware that there were recurring themes emerging as they worked on the songs.

“The songs are reflective of being home and about our personal lives,” he says. “I think it’s more honest and introspective.“ And the clear emphasis on honing the songs and making a piece of work that has a lasting impact is also present. In the end, he offers, the songs are all any musician has. “We’re only going to able to play live shows for a certain number of years,” he says, “the songs are going to be the things that outlast us all.”

As for the writing itself, Terndrup points out that despite an idea that was floated in the press early on, there are only three major writers in the band. “I would say that Spencer and Wes and myself are the main idea sparkers and then we all fan the flames of the idea,” he says. “We do try to adhere to that democratic system of everyone being able to contribute. But not everyone’s a songwriter. That’s something that we used to say but it’s just not true."

Conveying his own emotions in songs may be one thing but having to convey those felt by others is another and so, he says, there are times when that democratic process challenges everyone’s vision and abilities. “I’m in a unique position because I have to sing it and internalize the words and the melodies. Sometimes it’s not going to end up the way that the other guys may have thought it would,” he offers. “So, in that sense that’s a real collaboration. I’m filtering it through my brain. But the whole process goes smoothly out of respect for everyone else’s musicianship and their abilities and who they are as people. We’ve had the same lineup for about eight years now so I think we have a good way of dealing with all those personality types.”

Although he’s tight-lipped about his influences he’s less tight-lipped about his instrument of choice, saying that he feels like there’s a reason that the electric guitar continues to endure.

“I think some of it is that the spirit of those original rock ‘n’ rollers lives on and that every suburban kid wants to pick up a guitar and learn it. I think it’s also that sense of freedom that it gives you, that sense of rebellion,” he says. “And you’re able to pour your angst into three power chords and the truth. I think that that will still resonate with people, despite all these big bass drops and all the electronic stuff. I think the guitar will endure. I don’t think that anyone’s going to pick up a laptop and say, ‘Oh yeah! This is my ticket to rebellion.’”

At the same time, he says, he and the other Moon Taxi men aren’t averse to offering listeners hints of the latest electronic gadgets.

“We do like to incorporate new technology into our sound but we like to blend that with old guitar harmonies, the occasional banjo,” he says. “We’re trying to strike a balance between that new and old approach as well.”

And no matter the technology on hand Terndrup says that he band has a very traditional goal in mind with its music: “I think the ultimate goal is to please people and leave people either changed in a positive way or an introspective way. I write for other people. I want them to sing along, even if it’s just a catchy melody with nonsensical words,” he says. “They can interpret them however they want but I think the audience if very key to our writing process. We want them to be changed—in a positive way.”

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.