Mötley Crüe: The Best of Mötley Crüe (20th Century Masters: Millennium Collecti

Kevin Jagernauth

Mötley Crüe

The Best of Mötley Crüe (20th Century Masters: Millennium Collection)

Label: 20th Century Masters: Millennium Collection
US Release Date: 2003-10-07
UK Release Date: 2003-11-17

When Mötley Crüe first burst on the hair metal scene in the early '80s, they were the kind of guys fathers told their daughters to stay away from. Notorious drinkers, drug users, and womanizers, Mötley Crüe became the template for bad boy rock 'n rollers that countless other acts would follow. Too Fast for Love, Shout at the Devil, and Theatre of Pain have all become touchstones of '80s hair metal. In 1987, Mötley Crüe released Girls, Girls, Girls only to find another Los Angeles, California band come along and steal their thunder. That same year, Guns 'N Roses released their debut album Appetite for Destruction. The album was a success both on the charts and with critics, and their lurid, graphic account of life on the fringes of society rendered the teased hair, girl-crazy antics of acts like Mötley Crüe irrelevant. Guns 'N Roses came across as the real deal, too busy avoiding the cops to worry about make up, clothing, and how much hairspray they could put in their hair.

Mötley Crüe continued to rock on, coming back with Dr. Feelgood in 1989. Though the group would continue to release records throughout the '90s, the musical climate had changed significantly, and the band faded away except with diehard fans.

2003 has found Mötley Crüe reissuing deluxe editions of all their albums, as well as an unfortunately named boxset, Music to Crash Your Car To, and a greatest hits CD. To round out the year, Hip-O has decided to give Mötley Crüe 20th Century Master status (which band doesn't get one of these albums?), collecting twelve tracks spanning their entire career, from their debut to the ill-received New Tattoo released in 2000.

Like a lot of the 20th Century Masters series, trying to keep the cost down has come at the detriment of the tracklisting. While casual and hardcore Crue fans will be delighted to see tracks such as "Shout at the Devil", "Home Sweet Home", and "Kickstart My Heart", more notable are the tracks that remain absent.

"Looks That Kill", from their seminal Shout at the Devil, "Smokin' in the Boy's Room", a worthy competitor to Van Halen's "Hot for Teacher" as the ultimate high school metal song, and "Dr. Feelgood", their clean and sober return to the charts, are glaring omissions.

A comical cover of "Anarchy in the U.K.", along with "Generation Swine" and "Hell on High Heels" from their last two studio albums, are unnecessary inclusions in this collection and are hardly tracks that Mötley Crüe will be remembered for.

While the RIAA continues to crack down on piracy and the industry as a whole bemoans downloading as a primary source loss for revenue loss, it's time the record labels began looking at the own practices as the source of some of their shrinking profits. Earlier this year, Hip-O released a Greatest Hits album that includes all of the missing tracks I have mentioned, but failed to include key tracks that are on the 20th Century Masters collection, including "Piece of Your Action" and the original "Shout at the Devil" (the Greatest Hits CD includes a sub-par 1997 re-recorded version).

Rather than upsetting fans (as the numerous Amazon customer reviews for both discs can attest to) and pouring money into releasing two sub-par discs, Hip-O could have released one stellar greatest hits collection. As it stands, Mötley Crüe devotees are forced to choose, and the previously released Greatest Hits album delivers most of the tracks fans are looking for, rather than the paltry offerings on the 20th Century Masters collection.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.