Neil Young: Living With War

Michael Metivier

Neil Young may not have been born in the USA, but on Living With War he sounds born to run.

Neil Young

Living With War

Label: Reprise
iTunes affiliate

The war I'm living through right now is being fought between the critic and music fan inside me as I try to comprehend Neil Young's much-hyped political electric opus Living With War. This is a record that was written and recorded less than two months ago, yet has already seen weeks of airtime on cable news tickers, reams upon reams of editorial newsprint, and the unholy collective bluster of a million bloggers. Clearly I have to give this one more thought than usual; the album has already been mythologized into more than an album. Living With War is an aural broadside, a beacon of light for the left and another potential straw man for the right. But is it good rock and roll?

The critic in me is skeptical from the outset. Living With War is declarative rather than evocative. And there's nothing my inner critic hates more than blunt, declarative statements of feeling. In fact, lyrics like "Let's impeach the president for lyin' / Misleading the country into war" make my inner critic's teeth shiver, regardless of my strong sympathy and shared politics. I've always thought it better to savor mystery and ambiguity in art—even art with clear intent and purpose—because they invite more discovery and deeper knowledge than the obvious. On the surface, Living With War is one giant echo chamber, telling me everything I've ever known and felt about politics since the fall of 2000. What's the point of that? But after the initial surprise at the nakedness of Young's lyrics, subtleties do emerge.

"Back in the days of 'Mission Accomplished' / Our chief was landing on the deck / The sun was setting on a golden photo-op." Bush's flight-suit fiasco and premature declarations of victory are common knowledge. But compare those lyrics from "Shock and Awe" with those from Young classic "Cortez the Killer", "He came dancing across the water / With his galleons and guns / Looking for the new world / In that palace in the sun", and a different message emerges, one far more urgent than partisan bickering. Living With War is not the "liberal media" or "Hollywood left" set to music. Young is simply following a tradition that includes Ochs, Dylan, and the Clash, but stretches back to Francis Scott Key and beyond, by elevating contemporary political events into the realm of myth. "The Star-Spangled Banner", which Young quotes during "Living With War", is essentially no different from "Shock and Awe", a day-after account of events that have become important American symbols.

The real story of "Living With War" isn't the sentiment of "Won't need no Shadow Man runnin' the government / Won't need no stinking war", or even the specific indictment of George W. Bush for "Spyin' on citizens inside their own homes" and botching the hurricane relief efforts on the Gulf Coast. The story of "Living With War" is the sadness, rage, passion, and hope of one man finally boiling over and speaking out, damning the excuse-making, conciliatory Democratic Party by pointing out with blunt child-like innocence and gravity that the emperor has no clothes. Stephen Colbert's doing it with humor; Neil Young's doing it with rock and roll.

The music fan in me has been convinced by Living With War from the opener "After the Garden" right through the cover of "America the Beautiful". The songs are infinitely more satisfying than Young's last plugged-in affair, the lumbering, bewildering Greendale. Living With War is leaner, tougher, more melodic. "The Restless Consumer" hits with the blunt force of a hammer after an opening with idle strumming that sounds strangely enough like the Dirty Three. Young achieves the full potential of his songs as populist anthems by employing a hundred-voice choir to back the trademark brawn of his electric set up, calling out "Don't need!" on the choruses while Neil rails against Madison Avenue, and the crass flood of pharmaceutical commercials, "Don't need no TV ad tellin' me how sick I am / Don't wanna know how many people are like me / Don't need no dizziness, don't need no nausea / Don't need no side effects like diarrhea and sexual death! / Don't need no more lies!" Young's voice is in fine form, full of humor, confidence, and a whole lotta pissed off—more than anything, it's what carries the album.

The songs are mostly non-blues, minor chord-charged garage stompers in the vein of "Rocking in the Free World" and Mirrorball. The sound isn't revolutionary, but it's tuneful and surprisingly catchy. The shortest track, "Families", is sweet and gentle despite the fuzz and feedback, as Young takes on the voice of a soldier overseas, "When you try to bring our spirit home / Won't you celebrate our lives in a way / That's right for our children and families / When you write your songs about us / Won't you try and do us justice". Young does, by injecting necessary humanity into stories that are dominated by collagen-enhanced and shellacked talking heads, and by challenging a political culture that simultaneously touts and erodes freedom of speech. "Flags of Freedom" tips its hat to Bob Dylan both musically and lyrically. Borrowing its melody from "Chimes of Freedom", the song focuses on a young girl (listening on headphones to "Bob Dylan singin' in 1963") whose brother is shipping off to war. As the parade of men and women march down Main Street in a patriotic send-off, she catches a glimpse of the president giving a speech on "a flat-screen TV in the window of the old appliance store". When she turns back to the parade, she's missed her brother, a subtle indictment of how the allure of political rhetoric can distract from the human reality of war.

"Let's Impeach the President" has received the bulk of the press surrounding Living With War, opening with "Taps" and featuring lines like "Who's the man who hired all the criminals?" and "Let's impeach the president for hijacking / Religion and using it to get elected", though the most effective part of the song is when Young hands the microphone over to GW himself. Playing sound-bites of the president while shouting "flip" and "flop" in the background, Young parodies the Rove strategy to discredit John Kerry in the 2004 election. Here you get just some of the Bush classics like "All I can tell you is that Osama Bin Laden is a prime suspect", "I don't know where [Bin Laden] is… I just don't spend that much time on it", as well as "Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of Al Qaeda" and "I know I didn't say that there was a direct connection between September 11th and Saddam Hussein". It's not the album's strongest song, but it is in many ways the fuel source of Living With War, with the implications of Bush's own words lingering between every line.

It was inevitable that the media would be drawn to "Let's Impeach the President" like moths to a flame, as the most sensational and Hannity-baiting cut on the record. But when introduced to the public for free-streaming on the internet, Young presented the record as a whole, without the option of skipping to one song or another. "Impeach" is just one distorted face in the album's garage rock Guernica. In context, no song on Living With War is as simple as it may seem on its own—not a bumper sticker, not a pamphlet, not the slightest wrinkle in a Sunday morning pundit's furrowed brow. It's a direct shot into the national discourse from a rock world that has been largely silent until recently. Both halves of myself, the blue critic and the red rock fan, wondered if this album could ever be viewed as something other than a self-righteous pat on the back by either side of the political spectrum. But I'm convinced that the album is at heart a uniter, not a divider, and certainly not a decider. Regardless of one's views on a given issue or politician, the fearless passion Young, band, and chorus all bring to Living With War is impressive enough to hopefully make these lyrics from "Families" its most talked about and repeated: "There's a universe between us now / But I want to reach out and tell you how much you mean to me and my family / ... I can't wait to see you again in the U.S.A."


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.