Old Gods Almost Dead: The 40-Year Odyssey of the Rolling Stones by Stephen Davis

Tara Taghizadeh

Deserves a spot on every bookshelf (Stones fan, or no Stones fan). And to the gentlemen of the Rolling Stones we have this to say: Thanks, and for our sake, please keep rockin'.

Old Gods Almost Dead

Publisher: Broadway Books
Length: 592
Subtitle: The 40-year Odyssey of the Rolling Stones
Price: $15.95
Author: Stephen Davis
US publication date: 2002-11
"Until the undertaker pulls up to the door."
— Keith Richards' response to the question: How long can the Rolling Stones keep playing?

The undertaker isn't lurking anywhere near the door. The mighty Rolling Stones, great granddaddies of rock 'n' roll, seem to have scared off the inevitable doom which generally arrives a few years after a band has ridden the waves of glory and fame. Sorry, think again. These fellas are here to stay. This thing is bigger than the both of us, baby. Thank God.

Alright, so they're in their 60's, proud husbands or ex-husbands and fathers and grandfathers, and let's face it, not as –- how shall we say? –- sprightly as they use to be. Yes, they have milked us for every penny, and can never equal the greatness they achieved in the 1960s when they established themselves as the voice of a generation, but they can still bring the house down, and they're important cultural icons. Listen to the radio, on any given day, and I guarantee that "Satisfaction" or "Ruby Tuesday" or "Sympathy for the Devil" will soon blare through your speakers. Most of us grew up against a backdrop of Stones music (and I'm not just referring to the Baby Boomers). Punk, new wave, and grunge may have come and gone, but the Stones were always there. As the writer Tom Wolfe once said: "The Beatles want to hold your hand, but the Rolling Stones want to burn your town." Burn, baby, burn.

And if that isn't enough, get a load of this: Mick Jagger -- that's Sir Mick to you -- was recently knighted, earning him a respectable place alongside other "Sirs" of the music world: Paul McCartney and Elton John.

Stephen Davis' Old Gods Almost Dead: The 40-Year Odyssey of the Rolling Stones arrives just in time for the Stones' 2002/2003 world tour. A hefty book (almost 600 pages), it's chockfull of fascinating Stones history and gossip. From how they got their start, to the Mick/Keith songwriting process, to quibbling with managers and record labels, to their turbulent love lives, to the drugs, to the gradual accumulation of millions of dollars and world recognition, it's all here.

Davis begins in 1962 with the enigmatic and ill-fated Brian Jones (who along with Ian Stewart) founded the group. The troubled and promiscuous Jones who, as Davis describes, "could get a girl pregnant with the toss of his head," was playing in a blues band when three guys (who had their own band) turned up to watch the show. They were Mick Jagger (who was still "Mike" back then), Keith Richards, and fellow band member Dick Taylor. The rest, as they, is history. From there, the group began to merge, and soon enlisted the talents of Bill Wyman and drummer Charlie Watts who needed tremendous coaxing to give up his day job, and finally acquiesced by quipping: "Yeah, all right then, but I don't know what my dad's gonna say." Brian dubbed them the "Rollin' Stones" (in honor of the Muddy Waters' song), and they were on their way.

The Stones' arrival couldn't have happened at a more appropriate time. London was swingin' and the Beatles had led what would become the British Invasion, paving the way for other acts to follow on the blazing trail of success. However, the Stones' manager, Andrew Oldham, decided to market the Stones as the "anti-Beatles." Forget the neat, squeaky-clean image. According to Keith Richards: "To the extent that they looked all clean-cut and good, we would look scruffy and evil." As Davis elaborates:

If the Beatles were a blast of oxygen into a wheezing England, the Rolling Stones would be a dopey whiff of nitrous oxide. . . . Andrew Oldham's rethink of the Stones' image built a successful model of pouting, rudeness, and contempt since used by hundreds of bands through four decades of rock, punk, and Brit-pop.

Davis deftly outlines the Stones' music chronology; how songs were conceived, written, and eventually compiled into various albums. Their first album topped the charts in 1964, and soon thereafter, the dour boys of rock n' roll took their show States-side, where they made their TV debut on Dean Martin's Hollywood Palace, after being rejected by Ed Sullivan who had feared that the Stones' rough-and-tumble image wouldn't fare well with his viewers. (Sullivan, bowing to pressure, eventually invited the Stones to appear on his show.)

Now that they were on a roll (pardon the pun), the Stones began to adhere to the sex, drugs, and rock 'n' roll lifestyle, particularly Keith, and Brian who, whenever he resurfaced from his drug-induced haze, would resent Mick's popularity as the Stones' front-man. Drug use (often resulting in raids and arrests), glamorous parties, and a stream of girlfriends –- including Mick's relationship with singer/actress Marianne Faithfull, and later Bianca Perez, and Jerry Hall, and Brian's (and eventually Keith's) long-term dalliance with groupie/model Anita Pallenberg -- became front-page news. Brian's drug-related antics in particular were so notorious that even Keith (no choir boy himself) remarked: "You'll never make thirty, man." Brian's response: "I know." (According to Davis, Bob Dylan's "Like a Rolling Stone" was written for Brian.)

The author acknowledges that Let It Bleed reigns not only as the Stones' most important album, but an all-time rock and roll legend. Tracks such as "You Can't Always Get What You Want," "Gemme Shelter," and "Love in Vain," assured its success, although as Davis explains: "No rock record, before or since, has ever so completely captured the sense of palpable dread that hung over its era." Doom and gloom had also visited the Stones as they sacked Brian Jones from the band and later coped with his mysterious death. Jones drowned in his pool, apparently affected by a large intake of drugs. A 1969 concert in Altamont, California, where a young African American was killed by a Hell's Angel, cast another dark shadow, inspiring many to declare that this was "the end of an era." According to Davis, the Hell's Angels, angered by the Stones blaming them, had a contract out to kill Mick for years to come. In addition, Wyman had already started thinking about leaving the band, and would later face a media circus when he started dating 13-year-old Mandy Smith. (Wyman eventually quit, married the no-longer-jailbait Smith, and opened a restaurant.)

Davis' talents as a writer are not only based on his respectful and arduous research of one of the world's most important bands, but his rare ability to tell a splendid tale. What's most fascinating is the individual picture of each Stone that emerges as the story progresses. In a recent 60 Minutes interview, Keith Richards said that that the Stones could be equaled to a mom and pop shop, with he and Mick as mom and pop. Only thing is, they haven't decided yet as to who is mom and who is pop. Davis quotes a source who further elaborates: "There's an old saying among those who have known the Stones for a long time. It's that Mick wants to be Keith, and they all want to be Charlie." Charlie, the cool, collected drummer is depicted as the voice of reason and, along with the happy-go-lucky Ronnie Wood, the go-between for Mick and Keith. Mick comes across as a nice guy with a bit of an ego, and Keith is, without doubt, the resident wit.

Throughout the '70s and '80s, the Stones successfully morphed themselves to fit the mood of the times, occasionally overshadowed by the arrival of fresh young punk, new wave, and grunge superstars who made the old-timers seem what they really were, old-timers. The Stones, however, kept rolling; offering funk, or ballad-type alternatives, though their core -- rooted in R&B -- remained firmly intact. Collaborating with greats such as Zigaboo Modliste and David Sanborn, and sharing the concert spotlight with the likes of Sheryl Crow and Prince, further ingrained the band in rock mythology.

There are three acts I've always wanted to see live. I missed my chance to see the late Frank Sinatra, and I'm still waiting on James Brown. But on a hot, muggy night in the summer of '94, I got to see the Stones (sans Wyman) at RFK stadium in Washington DC. They looked old (they're old enough to be my father, and Bill Wyman is actually older than my father), but the place was hopping. Jagger still ranks as one of rock's sexiest men, and he brought down the house. The theatrics of the Voodoo Lounge tour were a tad over the top, but so what? They belted our favorites, and the crowd cried out for more. Recently, I was pleasantly surprised to see that my two-year-old nephew started dancing as soon as his father put on a Stones CD, so it's safe to say that future generations will also keep the Stones' legend alive.

Old Gods Almost Dead deserves a spot on every bookshelf (Stones fan, or no Stones fan). And to the gentlemen of the Rolling Stones we have this to say: Thanks, and for our sake, please keep rockin'.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.