Supernatural: Season 11, Episode 13 - "Love Hurts"

Jessy Krupa

A stand-alone episode focusing on a well-loved horror movie cliche continues the show's history of doomed romances.


Airtime: Wednesdays, 8pm
Cast: Jensen Ackles, Jared Padalecki, Misha Collins, Mark A. Sheppard
Subtitle: Season 11, Episode 13 - "Love Hurts"
Network: CW
Air date: 2016-02-10

Love hurts, love bleeds, especially on this week's episode of Supernatural, and really on the show in general. Just about all of the show's characters have experienced heartbreak and terrible relationships, beginning with the death of John Winchester's (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) wife, Mary (Samantha Smith), and continuing on with Dean's doomed relationship with Lisa (Cindy Sampson). It's worth noting that only two characters in the series' ever-expanding universe are currently happily married: hunter Garth (DJ Qualls) and his werewolf wife, Bess (Sara Smyth). So, it was easy to suspect that this Valentine's Day-themed episode wouldn't be the sort of thing you see in jewelry commercials.

In Love Hurts, every kiss ends with a "K", which in this instance stands for "kill". The beginning showed a typical married couple (Jim Thorburn and Luciana Carro) preparing for a Valentine's date night. The twist is that the husband is sleeping with their teen babysitter (Zoe Fraser). The second twist is that he comes back to literally rip the girl's heart out.

Back at the Winchester bunker, Sam comes across the case while doing his usual online newspaper search of odd deaths. Dean is happily hungover and bragging about the previous night's "romantic" conquests. Naturally, they arrive on the scene as fake FBI agents and assume a shapeshifter is behind the murder.

After her husband is killed by what seemed to be the dead babysitter, the wife, Melissa, confesses to the Winchesters that she has been using witchcraft recommended by her “white witch” hairdresser, Sonja (Venus Terzo). Sam's research indicates that they're dealing with a quareen, an Arabic creature controlled by whomever holds its actual heart. This quareen is bonded to a “kiss of death” curse, in which it kills whomever the curse-er kisses, as well as can be transferred to whomever the curse-ee kisses. It's a lot like the movie It Follows, or if you're older than 25 years, Final Destination.

Confusing curse-logic aside, Dean takes the heroic risk of kissing Melissa so that the quareen will go after him instead. After hearing that it takes the form of "your deepest darkest desire", the brothers rock-paper-scissors over it. Dean wins, and as Sam goes off to find Sonja, Dean finds the quareen disguised as Amara (Emily Swallow).

Like most loyal Supernatural fans, I'm sure you would LOVE to hear all about Dean's strange bond with Amara, and how she can't be denied (that's sarcasm, of course), but let's skip the specifics of that imaginary conversation and get to the point. Sam fights and eventually stabs Sonja, leaving him to break the curse and vanquish the quareen by destroying its black heart.

Dean, who was almost killed, finds the courage to tell Sam about his conflicting feelings for Amara. Instead of the usual "I can't believe you hid this from me" argument, Sam is surprisingly understanding about his brother's "condition" and they vow to work together on killing the Darkness. It's a nice change of pace from the usual way in which these brotherly conversations turn out.

Other Observations

Next week's episode, which has been described as Supernatural's "version of Das Boot", will take place on an Navy submarine during WWII. Dean mentions time travel, but perhaps it has something to do with the Men Of Letters as well?

Did anyone think the quareen really was Amara at first? Does the next episode remind you of an old episode of The X-Files? Will Supernatural get to be on the cover of Entertainment Weekly? Discuss below.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.