Music

Peter Holsapple and Chris Stamey: Mavericks

In whatever decade you first discover it, Mavericks is a great album.


Peter Holsapple and Chris Stamey

Mavericks

Label: Collectors' Choice
US Release Date: 2008-01-15
UK Release Date: 2007-12-03
Amazon
iTunes

From the Byrds to Tom Petty, early R.E.M. to mid-'90s bands like Toad the Wet Sprocket and Gin Blossoms, there has long been something sweetly exuberant about the clean, crisp jangle of a guitar. Such tones from such bands seem to somehow express an ideal or the idea of freedom in the midst of an average, everyday existence. Especially when coupled with glowing harmonies, the sound typified by such bands has often been a part of some very glorious, very timeless rock and roll.

In 1991, Peter Holsapple and Chris Stamey released Mavericks, and more than 16 years later, a listen to the album's reissue all the more assures its deserved place along the timeline of great heartland/jangle rock recordings of all-time. Formerly of North Carolina-originated band the dB's, which opened for R.E.M. in the late '80s (the connection between the bands continued with Holsapple touring at times with R.E.M. and playing on their 1991 masterpiece Out of Time), the pair reconvened for this project.

Filled with well-crafted songs, each built of well-crafted guitar licks and harmonies, the original album was excellent from start to finish. The reissue features six bonus tracks, including a demo version and some different mixes/recordings of Mavericks cuts, as well as fresh reflections from Holsapple and Stamey in the liner notes. The songwriters' musings include Holsapple's statement:

"Mavericks may be our most enduring record together. It's the album that people relate to most easily. Is it because it's more lyrically mature than a dB's record? Less combo organ? More acoustic-based? It certainly is less frenetic and nervous, but you can still tell it's Chris and me at work…. My musical partnership with Chris has yielded some fine music, and Mavericks is among the best of all."

Ascertaining the value and truth in those assessments seems a job best left to the performers and longtime dB's fans, but the album certainly is a mature, melodic gem with more than a few memorable tracks.

The project pricelessly starts with "Angels", a track about those guardians of soul that is quirky yet somehow straight-ahead, built on the pair's vibrant harmonies and the delicate momentum created on acoustic guitar. As the record continues through its best moments, listeners are treated to a "I Know You Will" that sounds a bit more dated than other tracks, but still possesses a special spark, the '60s-flavored, harmony-drenched "I Want to Break Your Heart" is soaring and tuneful, and "Geometry" uses math and science surprisingly well to illustrate the difference between lovers. Throughout all of these songs, the band's strengths (capable guitar playing, first-rate songwriting, and vocal cohesion) are clear and consistently relied upon.

"When Chris and I sing together, it sounds natural and good," writes Holsapple in the liner notes. "Neither of us are Carusos, but the combination of our voices is identifiable immediately and they're well-matched; maybe it's that 'whole is greater than the sum of the parts' concept." Holsapple's estimations here are certainly on display throughout the record.

Ultimately, the six aforementioned bonus tracks don't add a lot of depth to the recording or reveal much about the process or sessions. The best of those included are the "original demo" version of "Angels" and the closing "I Knew You Would". As the 1991 album version of the former is one of the record's best tracks, a second rendering is welcome. The latter is a satisfying and expansive track that does serve as an excellent coda and to round off the project well.

dB's fans will certainly appreciate how Mavericks recalls the talents of their leaders and showcases them in a very becoming setting. Those with little exposure to the artists would do well to experience the project, too. Timeless elements of rock and roll are present here, executed with grace and precision. In whatever decade you first discover it, Mavericks is a great album.

7

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image