Phosphorescent: Aw Come Aw Wry

Kevin Jagernauth

Looking for something authentic? Be careful what you wish for.


Aw Come Aw Wry

Label: Misra
US Release Date: 2005-06-07
UK Release Date: 2005-06-13
Amazon affiliate

What is authenticity, really? When a critic says that something sounds "authentic", what does he or she actually mean? There are occasions when an artist performs so brilliantly within a given genre that the term applies and carries some weight. However, more often than not, "authenticity" means nothing more than a collection of carefully realized clichés. What is the point of sounding authentic if it comes at the price of originality?

Phosphorescent is the brainchild of Tim Houck, who at the age of 26 is already making some extraordinary claims in his press bio. Aligning himself with Jeff Magnum, Will Oldham, Neil Young and Bob Dylan, Houck certainly isn't bashful and is definitely ambitious. The album's 12 songs stretch languorously over 62 minutes, fleshed-out by a wide array of instrumentation ranging from horns to pedal steel to pump organ. On paper the album certainly sounds like a sweeping epic, but for all its grandeur, Aw Come Aw Wry is the bloated excess of a songwriter who has yet to learn how to edit his dramatic, sad sack muse.

If there is going to be any enjoyment in Aw Come Aw Cry, the listener will have to buy Tim Houck's voice. He has a frustrating and thoroughly annoying habit of intentionally making his voice crack. Though thankfully never reaching the heights of Tim Kinsella's pre-pubescent squeal, it is nonetheless a ridiculous ploy to infuse sympathy into the songs. While the use of his voice is a desperate tactic, these aren't the only tools in Houck's arsenal designed to rouse depression out of his listeners. "Dead Heart", "(South Of) America" and "Endless Pt. 2" employ a backing choir throughout the entirety of each song, so that instead of punctuating certain moments, Houck punctuates all of them -- rendering the emotional power useless. Even the very structures of the songs themselves are built upon fairly conventional archetypes. With the exception of "Joe Tex, These Taming Blues" and "I Am a Full Grown Man (I Will Lay in the Grass All Day)", each song lopes along at a depressive's pace, while the drummer practically falls asleep at the kit, hitting his snare the requisite once every four beats. Oh sure, the wheezing pump organ and whining pedal steel are nice enough, but they don't do anything particularly memorable.

But the worst crimes of all are the album's indulgent instrumental passages. "Aw Come Aw Wry parts #5, 6 & 3" (yes, in that pretentious order) add nothing to the album's overall scope and depth. Though less than a minute each, the repetition of the meaningless album title and the formulaic countrified atmosphere are completely unnecessary, as is the ridiculous 19-minute closer "Nowhere Rd., Georgia, Feb. 21, 2005". With no music present, it is merely the sound of rain falling and cars passing outside of a window. Are we supposed to be charmed by this? Is this some kind of hyperrealism that's supposed to make the rest of the album resonate with that much more sincerity? Somewhere in this sprawling mess of a record, there's a good EP waiting to get out.

Aw Come Aw Wry is a curious failure. In trying to emulate his idols, Houck forgets the key ingredient that made all those aforementioned artists legends. They believed in their songs. While all are gifted lyricist backed by fantastic bands, their gift came from a simple belief in the undeniable sincerity of the words that came out of their mouths and the chords they struck on their guitars. Houck has yet to find confidence in his abilities and instead offers an album of emotions without humility that are ultimately deadened by the disc's artificial trappings.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.