Please donate to help save PopMatters. We are moving to WordPress in January out of necessity and need your help.

Prince and Michael Jackson: The Rivalry and the Revolution

Joseph Vogel
Essential Michael Jackson and Ultimate Prince album covers

Deemed As polar opposites by the media, part of what made the Prince v Jackson rivalry so compelling was their similarities.

The Secret Meeting

Quincy Jones set up the secret meeting between Jackson and Prince in the summer of 1986. They had discussed concepts in the preceding months, but now things were becoming more concrete. Jackson had a demo finished; its unofficial title was “Pee” (some say it stood for “pressure” -- a theme of the song and video -- others for its intended collaborator: Prince). The song featured a killer synth bass hook, jazzy organ fills and an exploding chorus. Jackson and his team -- including Quincy Jones, manager Frank Dileo, and recording engineer Bruce Swedien -- looked on as Prince listened to the track in the control room.

“It was a strange summit,” wrote journalist Quincy Troupe for Spin, “They’re so competitive with each other that neither would give anything up. They kind of sat there checking each other out, but saying very little. It was a fascinating stalemate between two very powerful dudes."

As Jackson envisioned it, they would begin leaking stories to the press about an escalating rivalry (which wouldn’t be a difficult sell given the media’s already-intense interest in any sign of conflict between the artists). Jackson was enamored with P.T. Barnum at the time and his use of publicity stunts to generate buzz and intrigue. “I want my whole career to be the greatest show on earth,” he told his managers. Earlier that year he had pulled off his first major coup, successfully planting a story about sleeping in a hyperbaric chamber in the National Enquirer (the story was subsequently picked up by media around the world).

Prince, who was no slouch at manufacturing publicity himself, was intrigued but skeptical. He was interested in working with Jackson, but didn’t like the fact that Jackson was in control of the project. He felt Jackson was setting himself up to look better on and off screen. “Prince was like, ‘Oh, he wants to punk me out on record. Who does he think I am, crazy?’” recalls Prince’s manager, Alan Leeds. “He couldn’t get outside himself enough to realize that it was the kind of thing that probably could have benefited both of them. Still, it would have forever been Michael’s video with Prince as just a guest. So that captured what the relationship couldn’t be. They were like Ali vs. Frazier. And the media couldn’t get enough of pitting these guys against each other.”

Prince later explained to comedian Chris Rock of his decision to pass on Bad: “Well, you know, that Wesley Snipes character, that would’ve been me. You run that video in your mind. The first line of that song is ‘Your butt is mine’. Now I said, ‘Who’s gonna sing that to whom? ‘Cause you sure ain’t singing it to me. And I sure ain’t singing it to you... So right there, we got a problem.”

Ultimately, Prince offered a different song in place of “Bad”, reportedly sending Jackson an updated demo of "Wouldn't U Love to Love Me", an infectious, Janet-like groove which was later recorded by Prince protege, Taja Sevelle. Jackson, however, decided to pass. Both artists ultimately couldn’t bear to cede control of the project.

As Prince left the legendary “Bad” summit, he turned to Jackson and his team and said graciously, “It will be a big hit even if I’m not on it.” Thus ended the closest possibility of a collaboration between the two legends.

While Prince and Jackson never ended up working together, however, their careers intersected and complemented each other in fascinating ways. In October of 1988, Prince was playing Madison Square Garden while Jackson was at the Meadowlands in New Jersey. The media described it as the “trans-Hudson battle of the bands”. The two shows highlighted each artist’s unique talents and approaches. Jackson’s Bad concert was meant to to be the biggest and the best, to appeal to everyone, black and white, young and old, while Prince’s Lovesexy tour consciously moved outside mainstream pop expectations.

Jackson was the better dancer; Prince was the better musician. Jackson approached live performance with the precision and narrative arc of a film director -- everything was highly polished and choreographed. Prince, meanwhile, approached live performance like a jazz musician -- he was much more loose and improvisational. Setlists might change, as might performances of songs. Yet both possessed superstar charisma and presence, and both were able to create an ecstatic, almost revival-like feel with their audiences. Like gospel preachers, they generated a reciprocal energy -- a call and response -- that elicited a transcendent experience for many fans.

The media, of course, often felt compelled to take sides. “Bruce Springsteen may be pop music's most passionate performer, Prince the most provocative and David Bowie the most theatrical. But Michael Jackson is the field's most dazzling entertainer,” observed the Minneapolis Star-Tribune’s Jon Bream. Li>The New York Times’ Jon Pareles disagreed. “Where Mr. Jackson asks for the simple exchange of his efforts for the audience's approval, Prince's show exults in joyful, risky freedom.” To this day, the debate rages on: Prince played more instruments; Jackson made far superior short films; Prince was a better lyricist; Jackson was a better vocalist; Prince was more prolific; Jackson was a more patient perfectionist; Prince had greater longevity; Jackson had greater cultural impact.

As with all rivalry debates (Stones vs. Beatles, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam, Janet vs. Madonna, Gaga vs. Beyonce), where one comes down in the end is subjective—and likely reached for more personal reasons. Quincy Jones felt music critics and journalists often used Prince to tear down Jackson rather than recognize each artist’s unique talents and creative visions. Moreover, the media obsession with superiority and conflict often obscured what they accomplished in tandem.

Not only did Jackson and Prince push and challenge each other, they opened doors and set the standard for thousands of artists and entertainers to come. Never before had two African American artists reached such stratospheric heights, shattering pervasive racial barriers on radio, television and film in the process. Both were totally unique, multi-dimensional artists who wrote their own songs, directed their own films, and conceptualized their own performances. Both created vast, diverse catalogs that spanned the spectrum of human emotion and experience. Both became ingrained in the DNA of American (and world) culture with their signature styles, sounds and images. Both challenged and disintegrated traditional borders of identity. Both broke records with their albums, films and world tours.

In the '80s alone, they produced a combined 30 Top Ten hits, including 13 songs that reached #1. From 1982-1984, Jackson’s Thriller spent a remarkable 37 non-consecutive weeks at #1. It would go on to become the bestselling album of all time, while its music videos revolutionized MTV and reinvented the possibilities of the medium. Prince’s Purple Rain, meanwhile, stayed atop the charts for an incredible 24 weeks -- from August 1984 to January 1985 -- the fourth longest run in music history. Prince would also become the first artist since the Beatles to have the #1 album, single and movie at the same time.

Neither artist was satisfied with mere commercial success. Their empires were created to protect, cultivate, and advance their creative ambitions. Both ultimately saw themselves as much more than entertainers -- they had something to say, and used every means at their disposal to express it.

The King of Pop and His Royal Badness remained competitive to the end. As Jackson prepared for his big comeback at the O2 Arena in London in 2009, he reportedly wanted to make sure his 50-date residency beat Prince’s 2007 record of playing 21 nights to an estimated 350,000 people. Notoriously unable to sleep at night, Jackson told director Kenny Ortega that he was buzzing with creative ideas and couldn’t “turn it off”. Ortega asked if Jackson might possibly put these ideas on hold until after the concert series had begun. “You don’t understand,” Jackson replied. “If I’m not there to receive these ideas, God might give them to Prince.”

Of all people, Prince knew what Jackson meant about being ready and receptive, regardless of when the inspiration came. Like Jackson, Prince was constantly “channeling”, and also had a difficult time turning it off. Asked by Rolling Stone if he was “addicted” to recording music, the artist replied that he felt a compulsive need to “download” what was in his head. “It's all there,” he explained. “I can hear it all right now. I can hear five albums in my head right now.”

Michael Jackson died on 25 June 25, 2009 -- the 25 year anniversary of Purple Rain. Several prominent news websites temporarily froze or crashed due to the overwhelming response. Jackson’s memorial was watched by an estimated one billion people -- only the funeral of Princess Diana of Wales compared in terms of audience size. Prince made no public statement, but according to multiple sources, was deeply affected by it. Author and talk show host Tavis Smiley remembers talking to Prince for “for hours... about his own mortality and what the loss of Michael Jackson really meant for him.” Asked about Jackson’s death in an October interview in France, Prince simply said: “It is always sad to lose someone you loved.” On tour, in the ensuing years, he often covered Jackson’s “Don’t Stop ‘Til You Get Enough”. Many years later, in a 2014 interview with Rolling Stone, he was asked to elaborate on his feelings about Jackson’s death, but again declined: “I don't want to talk about it. I'm too close to it.”

As it turned out, Prince was closer to Jackson than anyone could have anticipated. Like Jackson, his life was cut tragically short in the midst of a creative renaissance. On 21 April 2016, Prince was found unconscious in his Paisley Park elevator. Within hours he was pronounced dead. The news spread rapidly. As with Jackson, the global outpouring was enormous. International monuments were lit purple, as social media timelines filled with memories and tributes. President Obama praised him as “one of the most gifted and prolific musicians of our time... a virtuoso instrumentalist, a brilliant bandleader, and an electrifying performer."

In the wake of Prince’s death, several journalists revived the rumors of animosity between the artists, reducing their rivalry to a petty celebrity feud. The truth was less sensational. Michael Jackson and Prince respected each other. Yes, they were competitive; no, they were not best friends, but as fellow African Americans, as fellow pioneers, as fellow artists, they recognized each other’s struggles and achievements. They'd travelled similar journeys, after all.

Only a handful of artists change the world: Michael Jackson and Prince were two of them. Had the stars aligned, they would have collaborated on “Bad” back in 1986 or some other incredible project. But as it stands, they both blazed parallel tracks in the '80s and '90s, becoming the two most significant artists of a generation.

The pop music world today exists in the shadow of their revolution.

Joseph Vogel is an Assistant Professor of English at Merrimack College. He is the author of the critically acclaimed book, Man in the Music: The Creative Life and Work of Michael Jackson (2011) and the forthcoming monograph, Witnessing the Reagan Era: James Baldwin and the 1980s. His work has appeared in The Atlantic, Slate, The Huffington Post, PopMatters, the F. Scott Fitzgerald Review, The Journal of Popular Culture, the Journal of Popular Music Studies, and Scribner’s Dictionary of American History. He holds a PhD from the University of Rochester.

Prev Page

Please Donate to Help Save PopMatters

PopMatters have been informed by our current technology provider that we have to move off their service. We are moving to WordPress and a new host, but we really need your help to fund the move and further development.





© 1999-2020 PopMatters Media, Inc. All rights reserved. PopMatters is wholly independent, women-owned and operated.

Collapse Expand Features

Collapse Expand Reviews

PM Picks
Collapse Expand Pm Picks

© 1999-2020 All rights reserved.
PopMatters is wholly independent, women-owned and operated.