Eddi Reader: Sings the Songs of Robert Burns

Peter Su

Eddi Reader

Sings the Songs of Robert Burns

Label: Compass
US Release Date: 2004-02-03
UK Release Date: 2003-05-12

From -- I admit it -- disappointment after the first listen and a warming up after the next few listens, I've been listening to this album with monotonous frequency, with no sign yet of even beginning to tire of it.

The initial disappointment came from expecting more traditional performances of Robert Burns's songs, more Woody Guthrie solo or with harmonica than an arrangement for a full band. My fear had been that the soulful simplicity of Burns would be lost beneath the desire to be arty when singing the words of a Real Poet, a fear seemingly confirmed when Eddi Reader showed up with members of the Royal Scottish National Orchestra in tow.

At his best, Burns is minimal while maintaining his idiosyncrasy, soulful but not weepy, humanistic but no one's fool. It's that last quality that makes Burns the ideal folk poet. Besides even the sheer quality of his work, Burns also developed an artistic persona that speaks but knowingly of the human race, especially of the working people, that he himself was a member of. With a few alterations and changes in accent, it's a persona that Guthrie blazed a trail in adopting as a recording artist, a persona that the young Dylan mimed (via Guthrie) down even to the rugged workshirts. Burns is an idealist and revolutionary, but he's also not duped by the bloodthirsty Jacobites of the French Revolution, either. More than 150 years before Dylan, Burns's address to "Ye Jacobites" is a scathing reminder that he could see through their masks. As such, Burns's persona was not one I thought would mesh with an orchestra.

Despite being collected into poetry anthologies, usually clumped with Blake as the other Early Romantic before Wordsworth and Coleridge, despite my doubts about an orchestra, this album does an excellent job of getting Burns back to where he really belongs. Though academically respectable, he is a great folk poet and songwriter in the best tradition of Woody Guthrie and Bob Dylan. And, like Guthrie (but unlike, for the most part, Dylan), Burns has a genius for telling simplicity.

In "Ae Fond Kiss", Burns writes to a woman (one of the many) that he fell in love with. The poem itself was written upon that woman's leaving to go back to her husband. The poem itself makes no allusion to the specifics of the story (though it does use the woman's real name, Nancy, once). Instead, from Burns's pen, the song becomes the sort of universal bittersweet parting anthem that songwriters have been trying to write since before the first Bic lighter was held up during "Freebird". Despite the sadness of the farewell itself, Burns has no bitterness for his "first and fairest" for, after all, "nothing could resist my Nancy".

Everyone's felt this way, but that's the point, that everyone's felt this way but only a few have been able to articulate so well the lingering affection that softens (complements?) the sadness of parting prematurely from a crush. There's sadness, sure, but also too much affection to make any regret fully sincere.

Reader singing the song adds her own half-sighed, half-whispered "Bye bye, baby" to the end of the song, a simple addition on paper, but perfectly suited to the song. It's also a spontaneous (or seemingly spontaneous, who cares which?) gesture that undercut my own uncertainties that the music was too classical for my taste or the mood of the music. Besides, having a full band allows the musicians to later proudly mimic a brothel band in "Charlie Is My Darling". When they actually do go for the sort of echoing chamber music I first feared they would, it's for less than two minutes and, considering "John Anderson My Jo" is about old age and dying, it's actually pretty appropriate.

And, of course, the album ends with "Auld Lang Syne", an eternal classic so good that -- and this is personal experience -- it sounds good even when being sung by drunks on New Year's Eve. So good that even slowing it down and having violins linger in the background doesn't dampen the spirit, merely emphasizing the pensiveness of the lyric, making it a perfect song for old, sober friends over tea. If they ever unearth an old tape of Guthrie (with Cisco Houston and Sonny Terry accompanying, hopefully) singing Robert Burns tunes, I'll be racing to buy it upon release. But, even then, I'll still be hanging on to this, Reader's unexpected (for me, at least), compelling interpretations of those same songs.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.