'Republique': Some Types of Information Are Freer Than Others

Republique reminds us that some free expression is more immoral and more dangerous than other forms of free expression.


Platforms: PC, iOS
Developer: Camoflaj

Republique is an episodic stealth game. Originally released on iOS, it has made its way to Steam as well.

Republique is a game set in a surveillance state, the titular “Republique”, and its stealth mechanics are driven by a simple interface in which the player doesn't so much control the main character of the game, a young girl named Hope, but instead takes control of cameras and views Hope through them. You can instruct Hope about where she should move and where she should hide by “looking ahead” of her, leap frogging from camera to camera throughout a government facility and making strategic decisions on the basis of the information gleaned from the cameras. It is the system being used against itself.

The play probably works a bit more smoothly on a touch screen, but it plays serviceably using mouse and keyboard. This is a less action-oriented kind of stealth game than, say, Metal Gear Solid, but it is fun in its own right to sneak past adult guards without any recourse to violence, since Hope is just a kid in a world of authorities.

Thus, the subtext of the game is extremely anti-authoritarian. The game has been in development since at least 2012 and episodes have been released for the past two years, so there is a lot of clear real life referents that it draws upon to contrast with its own anarchic perspective, the Occupy Wall Street movement, the Anonymous hacker collective, Edward Snowden, government drones, and the like.

Alongside anti-corporatist, anti-statist, and anti-surrveillance, attitudes the game also connects the idea of government over stepping its reach through collectibles found throughout the game. This most often takes the form of banned books, descriptions of the “immoral” content of which are described by the dictator of the Republique in voiceover. So, in addition to being concerned with freedom of information, it more specifically ties that tradition to freedom of expression, more specifically artistic expression. After all, while some of the books that you find are political in nature, George Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm or Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead, others are books deemed immoral or subversive by the culture at large, like James Joyce's Ulysses, Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita, or J.D. Salinger's Catcher in the Rye.

The game clearly wants to connect this championing of artistic freedom in the literary world to the world of video games as well, as alongside these subversive books, there is another line of collectibles that can be procured that are video games published in recent years, indie video games. You can collect diskettes of games like Gone Home, VVVVVV, and Bastion.

The game's nod to these often more intellectually challenging art-house-style games seems an effort on Camoflaj's part to give shout outs to the efforts of fellow indie devs that have created games that are innovative and generally outside the mainstream, seemingly appropriate for a game so focused on the revolutionary in conflict with the status quo. However, the correlation to the banned books seems to end there, as I don't recognize any actual banned or highly controversial games among the bunch. Some of these games are sometimes maligned as “not games”, but no one has called for bans of them that I am aware of. They just don't like them. Games that have actually been banned (in countries outside of the United States) or recalled (in the United States) or that have caused outcries concerning their immoral or dangerous nature by various groups seeking to assert their moral authority aren't represented here.

Of course, most of the games that have been banned in some countries aren't usually considered indies, like the Grand Theft Auto series, the Wolfenstein series, Mortal Kombat, Bully, Manhunt, the Postal series, or South Park: The Stick of Truth. Games deemed dangerous by the political right and the political left or that publishers have chosen not to publish in the West because of a sense that Western culture will not accept them (such as the recent hooharah surrounding the decision not to release Dead or Alive Xtreme 3 in America and Europe) are left out of the mix. I suppose that is with the exception of the appearance of a box for Hotline Miami in one scene (though, this is not a collectible proper) , a series banned for its inclusion of scenes of sexual violence in Australia.

Of course, like the “pornographic” label attached to works like Ulysses and Lolita, perhaps many of the aforementioned titles don't need the shout out, since it is their controversial nature in and of itself that tends to have helped promote sales. Ulysses is not a book that most people would have purchased given its relative incomprehensibility to the average reader, well, that is except for its much publicized bannings as “pornography". Suddenly, the populace was interested in this “arty” book. Of more recent note, I remember clearly in the 1980s when The Last Temptation of Christ was released and protested by the religious Right how very much it helped ticket sales on what was a small art house film. The system, once again, being used against itself.

In a nutshell, I'm enjoying the gameplay of Republique, but it's also simply reminding me of all of the moral panics that I have lived through. In my youth, it was Dungeons & Dragons, Playboy, and heavy metal music that were immoral and dangerous, then it was Harry Potter and Grand Theft Auto, now it's Grand Theft Auto once again alongside games about strippers, prostitutes, and women in bikinis. Republique is a reminder that someone always wants to scrub art and expression of its potential immorality and inherent dangerousness, the names change, but the attitudes about determining what information should be free do not. Some types of information are always freer than others.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.