Rihanna - "Bitch Better Have My Money" (Singles Going Steady)

It should shock no one that "Bitch Better Have My Money", the best thing Rihanna dropped in 2015, didn’t make its way to Anti.

Timothy Gabriele: One thing I thoroughly enjoy about our current era is the bafflement of old industry types scrambling to figure out why the SoundCloud singles don’t wind up on the album, consistently throwing all their weight behind the notion that only the LP legitimizes the single, unable to face the new reality of streaming music. It should shock no one that “Bitch Better Have My Money”, the best thing Rihanna dropped in 2015, didn’t make its way to Anti. It’s practically the definition of a one-off. My wife and I are convinced it was written on a total misogynistic tip (Kanye’s a co-writer on the track, as is Travis Scott), but Rihanna just claimed it as her own. It’s like Rihanna’s own version of Tori Amos’ Strange Little Girls. The video would seem to continue the simple gender swap, exchanging horror film tropes of the male serial killer stalking unwitting females, but much of the video is spent tormenting and humiliating Mads Mikkelsen’s wife. It’s unclear if there is a feminist core to this, but unlike "American Oxygen”, which played safe by making its politics vague and opaque, “Bitch Better Have My Money” is murky and imperfect, nasty and aggressive, and a banger to boot. [8/10]

Marshall Gu: It’s essentially one long chorus, which means it’s a lazy song from a songwriting perspective, but the producers (Deputy, Travis Scott, Kanye West and WondaGurl) create such an exhilarating beat while every line out of Rihanna’s mouth is a powerful hook. I’d currently would rather hear no other song at a club than this one. [7/10]

Dustin Ragucos: Rihanna does so well to take the spotlight of "Where's my money?!" that Family Guy stole for a good minute. Sadly, the chorus is what listeners and mixers attend to when causing up their storms. That should be enough, right? Doubling on that sadness, "Bitch Better Have My Money" isn't on Anti. The song would've added more sonic variety to the classic sounds, the pop hitters, and the sad melodies. Or it might have crushed the mood. Maybe. Oh, and that Mads Mikkelsen appearance had my heart... [6/10]

Jedd Beaudoin: I was asked to confirm my age before watching this video. Is that because it's so adult or so predictably childish? [4/10]

Steve Horowitz: Wow! I thought gangsta rap died in the '90s. This is the same stuff with better production values and better bodies. There’s the thrill of just saying the title over and over again, but that wears thin. The video does a better job in a few minutes of telling a crime narrative than CSI or Special Victims Unit -- or its cable television equivalent. If the sex doesn’t get you, the violence will. [6/10]

John Garratt: I was blocked from listening to the song on Youtube (hey, someone out there has to prevent me from hearing or reading the word "bitch"), so I moseyed on over to Vevo's site. Now I see that YouTube was looking out for the parts of my constitution that shrivel up from nipple exposure. But if sex sells, then naked kidnappings, torture, and burning cars can't be too far behind. You would think that after all that Rihanna went through, she would be above using a vulgar voicemail threat to stir up a sensational single and video. Whatever lines her pockets, I suppose. I myself prefer "Mitch Better Have My Bunny". [3/10]

Paul Duffus: Given the multiple warnings at the outset about the awesome bad language, sex, and violence, this is actually a little disappointing. There’s the odd nipple and a light dusting of dismemberment, but nothing really shocking or terrible, i.e., cool. I thought there might at least be a ‘Randolph and Mortimer’ type joke at the end where it turned out that the bitch of the title actually only owed, say, $3, and Rihanna’s fury would be shown to be out of all proportion to the debt. Unfortunately this lacks even that derivative basement level wit. The chorus hook is huge, the rest of the track forgettable. The video makes no sense whatsoever. [4/10]

SCORE: 5.43

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.