Music

Rithma: Music Fiction

Maurice Bottomley

Rithma

Music Fiction

Label: Om
US Release Date: 2003-06-17
UK Release Date: 2003-06-30
Amazon
iTunes

Here's an intriguing and very welcome debut album from a newish name on the West Coast deep house scene. I can live without the hippy-trippy ethos that surrounds the project (and makes for some rather silly sleeve-notes). Ditto some very blue-eyed vocals from Rithma himself, which do detract from the music's overall effectiveness. However, these are minor quibbles, for this very Californian (and very Om) melange of new age ambience, jazz-house, and subtle electronica is one of 2003's better dance-oriented affairs and should be duly supported.

Composer/Producer Rithma (Etienne Sehelin to his mum) is just 23, plays a superior (blues-influenced) guitar, has a good ear for a jazz phrase and just enough of a dance-floor sensibility to endear him to the worldwide following for the laid-back house sounds that labels like Om and Naked have made their own. In addition, he is prepared to experiment with different textures, samples, and flavours with greater freedom than is usually the case. Thus, even if the very notion of dance music fills you with horror, there is enough musical enterprise on display to merit your attention.

A mellow, jazzy vibe infuses the most successful aspects of this session. Said "jazz" is both more melodic and lively than the anticipated Om "Mushroom" variety, as compiled by label-mate Mark Farina. Some nice muted brass adds considerably to the appeal of tracks like "Love and Music". In contrast, some of the moody, temple-bell exotica that are also a feature of the album have a sort of ECM-on-acid quality to it. That, too, works surprisingly well. These factors, plus some solid if unthreatening beats, dominate the first half of the set.

Folk meets jazz-funk in the opening "Dream Again". Hypnotic, laid-back house arrives with "Make You Mine" -- featuring some fine female vocals that could have been used less sparingly. This one could be a Lisa Shaw/Naked Music track, which should be recommendation enough. Voice apart, "Love and Music" is a wonderful club groove and I look forward to the remixes. The tempo drops and things become moodier with the sensuous, "abstract lounge" sound of "The Return". Rithma's arrangements have a spaciousness and a sensitivity to tone that is as captivating as it is refreshing. There are some parallels with the type of sounds you'd find on Shadow or Ubiquity but the touch is lighter and less dubby.

"Down in a Funk" (with Mitch Monker on flugelhorn) is perhaps the best of the funked-up jazz numbers but is followed by the pop-rock of "Sagebrush Blues", the album's one failure. More atmospherics (and mute trumpet) with "Everyone's Sleeping Today", the orchestral "Flying over the City", and the downright quirky "Mr. Lofgren", which allows Sehelin to indulge in a few tasty licks. I can't see any of these three getting club play, but they'll sound ideal in your more horizontal moments.

The remainder of the album is a bit too low-key and lacking in individuality (the broken-beatish "I Don't Mind" being a partial exception). Nonetheless, the music is never less than pleasant and mostly something considerably more substantial than that. Once more, the vocals are a disappointment but the instrumental touches are well above the average "chill out" affair. All in all, Rithma has done enough to ensure his place among names to watch out for in the coming months.

Om is a label with consistently high levels of achievement. Sophistication and intelligence characterise all its output. Rithma fits in perfectly with both the general style and the required standards of the company and with luck will be around for some considerable time. Not sure he quite warrants the "new wave of house" title some are bestowing upon him but he certainly shows there is still plenty of good music to be found at the smoother, jazzier fringes of dance.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image