Comics

Sacrifice Parts 1-4

William Gatevackes

A vocal portion of comic readers have wished for a return to a simpler time.

Sacrifice Parts 1-4

Publisher: DC Comics
Contributors: Various (Artist)
Price: $10.00
Writer: Mark Verheiden, Gail Simone, Greg Rucka
Item Type: Comic
Length: 130
Publication Date: 2005-09
Amazon

When the "Sacrifice" arc was announced, it caused quite the controversy in the fan community. Fans who were following The Omac Project miniseries grumbled about having to buy the "Sacrifice" arc, which ran through the Superman and Wonder Woman titles, due to its bearing a direct effect on The Omac Project storyline. But this controversy is nothing compared to the one that hit after fans saw the last page of the Wonder Woman installment.

(Spoiler warning: this review will reveal plot details from various DC Comic books of the past months.)

First, a background into the story leading up to this arc, which takes place between The Omac Project #3 and #4. Maxwell Lord, head of Checkmate, has co-opted a spy satellite owned by Bruce Wayne (who, as we all know, is Batman) to spy on the superhero community in the DC Universe. Batman eventually finds out that his satellite is no longer under his control and begins to investigate who the culprit is who stole it from him.

The "Sacrifice" arc starts as Superman is experiencing different hallucinations. He's seeing some of his deadliest enemies kidnapping the people he loves and murdering them in front of his eyes. As it turns out, Superman's friends were never in danger and he wasn't fighting an arch nemesis. Rather, under some mind-altering influence, he had attacked his friend, Batman, and almost succeeding in killing him. Only the last minute intervention of Wonder Woman stopped him from ending the Dark Knight's life.

While in JLA custody, Superman allows the telepathic Martian Manhunter access to his mind to see who has been controlling him. They find that Maxwell Lord, who has limited mind control powers, has been infiltrating Superman's psyche over the years. Slowly, Lord has built up a foothold in Superman's mind. Since Batman was getting a little too close to finding out the truth about his operation, Maxwell Lord decided that the time was right to spring his secret weapon before Batman connected him to the theft.

Upon learning the truth, Superman rushes off to Checkmate headquarters to confront Maxwell Lord only to return to Lord's mental control. Wonder Woman, who has tracked Superman, is attacked by the Man of Steel. The Superman/Wonder Woman battle takes up much of Wonder Woman #219. Wonder Woman realizes that the only way to stop Superman is to either kill him or have Maxwell Lord release his control of him. She returns to Checkmate headquarters and forces him to release Superman. He begrudgingly agrees but tells Wonder Woman that this is only a temporary reprieve. Once released, he will exert his control on Superman once again. The only way to stop him is to kill him.

And now comes the surprise that fans didn't expect: Wonder Woman breaks Lord's neck, killing him.

The scene, as written by Greg Rucka, does have an air of realism. Since he took over the book with issue #195, Rucka has written Wonder Woman as a warrior. When she confronts Lord, it is clear what her thinking is: by killing one man she is potentially saving the lives of hundreds of others. This is the pragmatic decision of a warrior. So while Wonder Woman's actions might have been out of character with the way she was portrayed twenty years ago, they are in character with her current incarnation. And an argument could be made that her killing Max Lord WAS heroic, considering how many lives were potentially saved.

But comic fans, especially long time readers, protested DC turning Wonder Woman into a killer. The main argument amongst this group was a simple one: heroes don't kill. Wonder Woman, a character they admired over most of her 64 years of existence, has become sullied forever by one page of one comic book. And Wonder Woman is not the only character to receive this sort of treatment. Consider Superman: although manipulated into seeing things that are not there, the murderous rage he feels at these hallucinations seems to be his own. Two of the noblest heroes now seem, at least under some circumstances, capable of taking life, a major development in the eyes of most fans.

This comes as a culmination of a certain section of comic fandom's increasing disenchantment of the comic medium. Over the years, comics have gradually grown darker and darker in tone. The stories have tried to be more "realistic", to reflect a more serious style and mood. We are now, except for a few exceptions, in the grim and gritty era of comics. A vocal portion of comic readers have wished for a return to a simpler time. A time when their heroes were heroes, not people who would kill or brainwash their enemies because they couldn't think of a better way of dealing with them.

Despite some complaints, books written from this "grim and gritty" point of view sell. As long as they do, authors will continue to push the boundaries with their writing. How far is too far, and do they owe anything to the devoted followers of these characters? That question will probably be answered when their interpretation of these characters fail to sell to the comic buying public. But since all issues of the "Sacrifice" arc have sold out, a change isn't likely to happen soon.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image