Sansho the Bailiff

Michael Buening

Despite his dissatisfaction, that so much of the film works magnificently is evidence of Mizoguchi 's hard driving perfectionism.

Sansho the Bailiff

Director: Kenji Mizoguchi
Cast: Kinuyo Tanaka, Yoshiaki Hanayagi, Kyôko Kagawa, Eitarô Shindô
Distributor: Criterion
MPAA rating: N/A
Studio: Daiei Studios
First date: 1955
US DVD Release Date: 2007-05-22

In a video interview titled "Production" on Criterion's Sansho the Bailiff release, assistant director Tokuzo Tanaka is refreshingly candid about what has been called one of the best films of all time. "He wasn't happy making the film. He wasn't making what he intended, and I was the only person to whom Mizoguchi could vent his frustration."

In 1954 Japanese director Kenji Mizoguchi was in the heart of his most acclaimed period. Sansho the Bailiff followed Life of Oharu and Ugetsu to win top prizes at the Venice Film Festival. He was receiving rapturous praise from prominent film critics. Jean-Luc Godard dubbed him “"Quite simply one of the greatest of filmmakers."

Mizoguchi has faded a bit from cultural memory outside academic and art buff circles, but there has lately been an attempt to revive his work through Janus-affiliated retrospectives and deluxe Criterion DVD releases. It’s much appreciated. Slow to the game, I first saw Life of Oharu at New York’s Film Forum and wondered why this amazing stylist has been largely overshadowed by post-war compatriots Yasujiro Ozu and Akira Kurosawa.

Mizoguchi’s patient minimalism and roiling interior emotions do not lend themselves to mass popularity. So it is perhaps not surprising that Sansho, featuring accessible climatic set pieces of a prison escape and slave revolt, should be one of his more memorialized movies. It is still a great film, but lacks the cohesion and lyric consistency of his masterpieces. Criterion’s thorough but not bloated package does a fine job of preserving its strengths while contextualizing its weaknesses. Says Tanaka, “I don't exactly agree that it's his best film, as some critics say. I don't put much faith in their regard for this film. I feel that Mizoguchi himself didn't derive real fulfillment from this film.”

What struck me first is that Tanaka so readily recognizes both his and Mizoguchi’s underwhelming opinion of Sansho. Secondly, what the director apparently wanted to expand upon is what I feel are its least successful aspects.

As the opening title card announces, this is “one of the world's great folk tales, full of grief.” Set during the classical Heian period, the central story tells of a brother and sister, Zushio (Yoshiaki Hanayagi) and Anju (Kyoko Kagawa), traveling with their mother (Kinuyo Tanaka) to meet their long lost father. They are captured, separated from their mother, and sold into slavery to the baron Sansho Dayu (Eitaro Shindo).

They learn to accept their fate until Anju sacrifices herself so that her brother can escape to reunite with their father and mother. It is a story of terrific suffering alleviated by hard-won slivers of redemption. In this way it is emotionally consistent with Mizoguchi’s films of the period and the short story “Sansho the Steward” by Ogai Mori upon which the film is based. (The original story and an oral transcript of the folk tale are included in the DVD booklet.)

Yet Tanaka says, “The sad story of Anju and Zushio wasn't what interested Mizoguchi from the beginning. It was Sansho the Bailiff, a slave owner of the time that he wanted to focus on. The subject matter that Mizoguchi really wanted to depict, and his initial intention to focus on the slavery system, were watered down quite a bit, and the sad story of Anju and Zushio became the central theme of the film.”

In a second video interview, “Simplicity”, critic Tadao Sato says Mizoguchi looked for actresses who were "gentle on the outside, but fiery within." That also describes his filmmaking footprint in general. The visuals are marked by Kazuo Miyagawa’s fluid crane shots and long performance-centered takes that actress Kagawa recalls, “let you maintain emotional's more natural."

But the scenes set at Sansho’s manor invert this formula. He is bombastic on the outside; the two main sequences here are marked by action and quick cuts. The characters are painted with wide overdramatic strokes. When Zushio orders the manor closed, the story offers an easy and unconvincing resolution to Sansho’s feudal slave system. Sansho is thematically important but narratively should be an incidental character.

In fact, Mori’s story reads more like a Mizoguchi film than the director’s adaptation. It maintains its spare and eloquent tone throughout. When Zushio escapes from Sansho’s manor, Mori writes:

Anju stood by the spring and watched the figure of her brother grow smaller as he appeared then disappeared behind rows of pine trees. The sun was almost at its highest point, yet she made no effort to climb the mountain again. Fortunately there seemed no other woodcutters at work nearby, so no one questioned Anju, who stood idling away her time at the foot of the mountain path.

Mizoguchi stages the scene as an action sequence with more kinetic, but distracting results that creates a weird tonal shift to Anju’s subsequent suicide. The film’s most beautifully shot and effective scenes concern the “sad story of Anju and Zushio”: the initial separation, Anju’s suicide, the mother’s calling out to her children wailing “how I long for you, isn’t life torture”, and the closing moments. Here the visuals have a graceful illusory quality suiting the characters’ stark lives and quiet dignity. The action is driven by Kagawa and Tanaka and the intensity of their characters’ suffering.

We will most likely never know how Mizoguchi envisioned the final film should play out. Despite his apparent unhappiness with the finished product, that so much of the film works magnificently is evidence of his hard driving perfectionism. The Criterion edition includes further insights into his working methods: how he blocked shots, the role of composer Fumio Hayasaka, and the use of “reflecting” to enhance performance. Though flawed, it is still a successful and multi-layered work. Its many positives have not been diluted with time. Tanaka concludes his interview, “I think, nevertheless that it is true to his style. Mizoguchi is Mizoguchi.”


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.