Sentridoh: Lou B's Wasted Pieces '87-'93

John Kenyon


Lou B's Wasted Pieces '87-'93

Label: Shrimper
US Release Date: 2003-08-12
UK Release Date: 2003-08-04

Before Robert Pollard, there was Lou Barlow. Like Pollard today, the Barlow of old released damn near everything he ever recorded, committing to tape songs both long and short, worthwhile and not, all in the name of full musical disclosure.

Unlike Pollard, however, Barlow had the blessing (or curse) of doing so during the height of the cassette tape. As he was leaving and/or being kicked out of Dinosaur Jr., Barlow already was experimenting with his own brand of quiet, confessional songs built on rudimentary strummed guitar chords. As if indulging split personalities (or at least an internal editor with a good ear), Barlow released some of these under the name Sebadoh, and some as Sentridoh. Sebadoh was basically home to his work with Jason Loewenstein and Eric Gaffney, while Sentridoh was Lou solo. At times, the difference was negligible, whether judged in terms of song-quality, sound quality, or performance.

But as Sebadoh evolved to become a powerful little rock trio, Barlow seemed to need the indulgence of Sentridoh as an outlet for a seemingly endless store of songs. While he was crafting some of the most incisive pop songs in indie rock on increasingly polished discs like Bubble and Scrape and Bakesale, he adhered to the lo-fi aesthetic of cassette releases on Shrimper, 7" singles on a variety of labels, and eventually, CD collections on Smells Like, Mint, City Slang, and, again, Shrimper.

Cassettes were an ideal format for Barlow. The ease of reproduction meant he could crank out tune after tune and release them quickly and efficiently, unconstrained by the thoughts of collaborators or record companies. The low quality allowed on cassette -- most if not all of these songs were recorded on 4-track -- meant he could record any time, anywhere, not forced to wait for studio availability. True fans allowed him the indulgence, holding Sentridoh to a different standard. Those enamored of Barlow's songs were willing to indulge him his excesses if the payoff was more songs.

The guiding principles of Sentridoh meant there were gems to be plucked from among a lot of lesser material, and as such, much of the best of that music has made its way to CD in the form of those above-mentioned collections. The Original Losing Losers collected much of the original tape, Losers, while Winning Losers, Lou Barlow and Friends, and Lou Barlow and his Sentridoh gathered stray tracks from other cassettes and singles, as well as previously unreleased songs.

Despite the closet-clearing appearance of those many releases, other tracks were left uncollected on CD until now. Shrimper dips another toe into the digital waters with Lou B's Wasted Pieces '87-'93, which collects the bulk of the Wasted Pieces and Most of the Worst and Some of the Best tapes.

These 31 tracks offer a good representation of what Barlow's Sentridoh had to offer. Some of this is unlistenable -- one-note jokes without any actual notes and noisy sound collages that might have been fun to create, but are angrily speaker-shredding when played. Barlow during this era still seemed unsure of his ability to make quiet, acoustic music. For every song that maintains a state of grace throughout, he offers a pretty song like "Raise Your Head" that dissolves in a cacophony of found sound and tape manipulation. It's not the singer or the song, but the songwriter's lack of faith in allowing his material to stand alone that seems to mar otherwise compelling tracks.

But much of this, particularly for hard-core Barlow fans, is a treasure, rescuing tracks long lost to those boxes of cassettes in the basement. Why did Barlow decide these songs should become part of the digital realm a decade later? It's anybody's guess. Those fans will herald the disc's release, but others will not -- should not, in fact -- spring for what is at best a curiosity.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.