The Shazam: self-titled

Jason Damas

The Shazam

The Shazam

Label: Not Lame
US Release Date: 2001-11-06

So begins "Oh No!", the second track on The Shazam's self-titled debut album. And it speaks volumes about their brand of hard-rocking pop music.

The Shazam's debut album was originally released in 1997, and it became a massive cult hit within the power-pop community, ultimately leading to a deal with Not Lame Records, who would later release their two follow-ups. But their debut on Midwest Records went out of print as quickly as it went in, becoming somewhat of a rarity. Now Not Lame has reissued this somewhat-legendary record, complete with four superior bonus tracks.

What has always been intriguing about The Shazam is how, despite being pigeonholed in the power-pop genre, they sound very little like their contemporaries. They rock much, much harder, and yet their songwriting is every bit as strong. In fact, the most notable difference is probably that when listening to The Shazam, the most obvious comparisons are ELO, early Cheap Trick, or the harder edges of The Raspberries or Big Star. So unlike most of their peers, they owe almost nothing to any music released in the past 20 years. The Shazam's rock Gods all hail from a time when the "power" was as important as the "pop".

And that may be the key to their success. While many of the late '90s great power-pop acts, such as Fountains of Wayne or Owsley, were unable to reach an audience beyond pop devotees, the edge and grit that The Shazam possesses (and that the aforementioned acts do not) is probably the exact reason why they're able to subvert their own genre. The blue-collar, no-frills feel of every single track on The Shazam is precisely what feels so refreshing. This isn't calculated, textbook, intentionally classicist power-pop. It's good, gritty rock and roll. It's Budweiser to their counterparts' Manhattans. And that's exactly why it works.

Frontman Hans Rotenberry's strained vocals -- one part Roger Daltrey, one part Alex Chilton -- evoke all the best of the bar band mentality. And that's part of the real charm here, that these Tennessee boys sound like the best local bar band that you've ever heard. They take some of the best parts of '70s British and American hard rock and mold it into something as good, occasionally better, without ever making it sound forced. They rock like Aerosmith, but their songs are as catchy as Badfinger.

More than a little something needs to be said for Brad Jones' production work, as well. He's well-known for his work with Marshall Crenshaw, Bill Lloyd, and Jill Sobule, but this is one of his best pieces of work: He manages to turn everything-in particular Rotenberry's guitar work-up to 11, while at the same time keeping it clean.

The reissue includes four bonus tracks not on the original release, and many of these match (or are superior to) the best parts of the original album. "I Hate That Song", in particular, is rescued from obscurity as a B-side and on compilation albums. It's a magnificently catchy anthem about that inescapable radio hit that you really, really don't like, but is just so catchy that you can't resist listening.

It is important to note that despite all this praise, The Shazam, like almost all of their peers weaned on classic rock, often fall into the trap of derivation. For all of their merits -- and as I just said, there are many -- it should be noted that, for better or worse, almost every note, every lyric, every beat on this album is entirely steeped in the '70s. That will only enhance the experience for some, but for many it will limit The Shazam's appeal. They are just one of many, many bands doing this very thing, and even if they're one of the best at their game, the very nature of the music means that on occasion it doesn't stand up and distinguish itself enough to be heard. Many listeners may shrug their shoulders and pull out a Who or Beatles album instead.

But since most critics love the classics that The Shazam musically name-drop, it's no wonder they grabbed the ears of critics and underground power-pop fans with their 1997 debut. And considering that it's been unavailable for several years despite the accolades, this is the best chance for new fans to get acquainted with one of the best underground hard rock-with-a-shot-of-pop bands of the past few years.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.