Simon & Garfunkel: Live 1969

Though certain themes and feelings still ring true, the poor quality of these recordings make the compilation come off as more of a patchwork affair.

Simon & Garfunkel

Live 1969

Label: Columbia Legacy
US Release Date: 2008-03-25
UK Release Date: 2008-03-25

Critics lauded the first four Simon & Garfunkel records as great folk rock achievements. Each album was considered a masterpiece by the duo’s fans, and each LP was considered better and more artistically advanced than its predecessor. Then several of their songs found their way on the soundtrack of the hit movie The Graduate, including one written specifically for the film, “Mrs. Robinson”. As a result, tremendous expectations and pressure were put on S&G to create another tour de force when they went in the studio to record a new disc in 1969. However, the two men had creative, political, and personal differences. Despite the tensions, they did complete the album, Bridge Over Troubled Water, and went on tour before the LP’s January release. The duo split up soon afterwards, but the record went on to become S&G’s most successful.

Live 1969 features 17 tunes from S&G’s tour in October and November recorded in six separate cities (Detroit, Toledo, Carbondale, St. Louis, Long Beach, and New York City). The material comes from all five records, and the duo is joined by the session musicians who played on their studio albums. The live versions of the songs do not sound much different than they do on the studio recordings. It’s unclear why these particular tracks were chosen and why they were ordered this way on the disc. It seems unlikely that these recordings were the best from each of the shows, as the compilation comes off as more of a patchwork affair. The inclusions are not chronological in order of when the songs were first written or when these recordings were taped. The set begins with “Homeward Bound”, an odd choice to start off a live album with, and ends with a quiet rendition of an older track, “Kathy’s Song”. The “Mrs. Robinson” track is marred by a high-pitched keyboard sound that disturbingly floats in and out of range. There is not much stage patter here; a few songs are given short introductions, but that’s about it. The conversation that is included suggests a certain amount of tension between Simon and Garfunkel, as they rarely interact with each other.

There are other reasons for stress as well. This is America in 1969, the time of Woodstock, President Richard Nixon’s first year in office, the moon landing, Vietnam War protests, etc. There are no mentions of what is going on in the world, although Simon had written several political songs. In fact, segments of the 1969 tour that were broadcast on television were often unable to find commercial sponsors because of the music’s political nature. This compilation was originally scheduled for release at a time nearer to its original recording date, and it seems the producers wanted to refrain from controversy for financial reasons.

Knowing this gives the lyrics a potency they had at the time, but might not be realized by a contemporary audience. What innocent lines like “Pigeons plot in secrecy” or “Feelin’ groovy” might have meant to an audience back then could be different for current listeners. Although the central political lesson of “Mrs. Robinson”, “Laugh about it / Shout about it / When you’ve got to choose / Anyway you look at it you lose” still remains just as potent and true.

This is also true for the healing nature of “Bridge Over Troubled Water”. This would have been the first time audiences heard the song, and the crowd responds enthusiastically to its offering of comfort. The words speak of when rough times, when pain is all around. There is a collective acknowledgement that they were living in hurtful times. The saccharin nature of the solace might be too much to bear for more contemporary, cynical listeners who believe this is the way life always is and has been. But for those children of the '60s who once believed in the dreams of a better tomorrow, the sounds of silence could only be redeemed by the sound of music. This new song gets the most positive group reaction. No wonder the future studio release of the album with this name became one of the best selling discs of the next decade.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.