Situation: Comedy

Michael Buening

Situation: Comedy is a reality show where NBC producers break the fourth wall, turn to us half-wit boobs and ask, 'Got any ideas?'


Airtime: Tuesdays, 8pm ET
Cast: Sean Hayes, Todd Milliner, Stan Zimmerman, Maxine Lapiduss, Fred Savage, Amanda Bearse
Subtitle: Comedy
Network: Bravo

A bold challenge has been posted on Bravo's website:

"Friends has taken its final bow. We've seen the last of Sex and the City. Frasier has left the building. Where will television find its next great comedy hit?

From you."

Uh, okay. Are you sure? I mean, I can try.

Lest you think the network sitcom couldn't sink any lower, along comes Situation: Comedy, a reality show where NBC producers break the fourth wall, turn to us half-wit boobs and ask, "Got any ideas?" From what I've seen, executive producers Sean Hayes (Jack from Will & Grace) and Todd Milliner transfer Project Greenlight's little-guys-get-a-shot-at-the-big-time format to television, with intermittently entertaining, but mostly underwhelming results.

Fantasizing about being a sitcom creator is kind of a strange. It just doesn't have the same appeal of being a film director, pop star, or Jerry Hall's boy toy. Getting a sitcom on television requires a lot of money, experience, and big league connections. No one tells Horatio Alger stories about how Marcy Carsey and Tom Werner maxed out their credit cards and used guerilla-style shooting to get The Cosby Show on the air. So I was surprised to find out that Situation: Comedy received over 10,000 scripts.

As selected dreamers pitched their so-so ideas at the opening of the first episode, it soon becomes clear that the most promising sitcom material will come from the contestants' personalities. Dale and Eddie are a late middle-aged comedy couple, throwbacks to a studio system style exemplified by Sally and Buddy from The Dick Van Dyke Show, and who could be perfectly played by Catherine O'Hara and Fred Willard. Shoe and Mark are hyperactive, "We are the knights who say ni" comedy nerds so enthusiastically compatible that they transcend their begging-for-a-wedgie behavior. Twenty-one-year-old Sean has one of the better-sounding ideas, about two clueless post-college friends working in retail.

Unfortunately, most of these characters don't stick around. In the first episode, Hayes, Milliner, NBC execs, and "show runners" Stan Zimmerman and Maxine Lapiduss winnow the contestants down to two writing teams: Shoe and Mark with The Sperm Donor and Andrew and David with Stephen's Life. Each team will shoot a 15-minute mini-pilot, the audience will vote, and the winners get a cash prize and a contract with a talent agency (these shows aren't even going into production). Fred Savage (Kevin Arnold's a suit!) and Amanda Bearse (Marcy from Married... With Children) are brought in to direct the pilots.

Like Project Greenlight, the show's tensions derive from putting creative talents and big egos in a high stress situation, with a somewhat predictable narrative arc (the steps of the production process) resulting in decent drama. There are some interesting insights into how a sitcom gets on the air, particularly how one can be reshaped around a cast and how different actors can radically alter its tenor.

However, where Project Greeenlight succeeded this past spring by always returning to one central storyline -- the redemption of goofball director Jon Gulager, Situation: Comedy is unfocused in its purpose. Nobody emerges as a fascinating personality, too many faces get too much screen time, and the tale of the contest winners gets lost. What is the passion that drives these wannabe Norman Lears? Why should we pin our hopes on they're becoming messiahs of the laugh track? Mostly they seem overwhelmed by their circumstances; only Andrew fights consistently for his vision.

Little dramas arise, but the suspense hangs slack. I saw no competition between the dueling pilots, and felt no curiosity about where they're headed. Editing is the key to all reality shows, and the structuring of Situation: Comedy is as serviceably mediocre as the entire product. So much of the show concentrates on network discussions among Zimmerman and Lapiduss, NBC Comedy Development's Renate Redford and Justin Levy, and President of NBC Entertainment Kevin Reilly that the show ends up working best as a documentary on why sitcoms are already bad, not a platform for reviving the genre.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.