Songs From the Second Floor (Sånger från andra våningen) (2002)

Elbert Ventura

Songs From the Second Floor may be blasphemous in its relentless tweaking of Christianity, but it is never less than sincere about its search for divine intercession.

Songs from the Second Floor (Sånger från andra våningen)

Director: Roy Andersson
Cast: Lars Nordh, Stefan Larsson, Bengt C.W. Carlsson, Torbjörn Fahlström, Rolando Núñez, Sten Andersson, Lucio Vucino
MPAA rating: N/A
Studio: New Yorker Films
First date: 2000
US Release Date: 2002-07-03 (Limited release)

Roy Andersson's Songs From the Second Floor carries the weight of a benighted world on its shoulders. An impressively imagined vision of millennial meltdown, this apocalyptic phantasmagoria can be gripping in its spiritual ache. The movie may be blasphemous in its relentless tweaking of Christianity, but it is never less than sincere about its search for divine intercession. Andersson leaves room for the tantalizing possibility that salvation exists; what's less ambiguous is his belief that none of us deserve it.

Ashen, Arbus-like figures sleepwalk through the dreary streets of an unnamed European city. The air is still -- Andersson seems to have composed his frames in a vacuum -- and a sickly green hue taints everything. Songs From the Second Floor follows the trail of several individuals: a loyal office peon, recently fired; a furniture vendor who sets alight his store; a senile general living in a baby pen; a mental patient who rants about Jesus; a business-savvy crucifix salesman. Inching toward oblivion, the chaotic world these creatures inhabit is comprised of a series of meticulously assembled tableaux. Empty hallways, hushed homes, and ajar doors dot Andersson's crepuscular landscape, a nightmare of cosmopolitan rot.

Essentially a plotless succession of surrealist vignettes, Songs From the Second Floor is held together by a commanding -- some would say domineering -- authorial hand. The Swedish Andersson won the Special Jury Prize at the 2000 Cannes Film Festival for this achievement, which took an ungodly four years to complete (a delay that undoubtedly cost him a timely pre-millennium premiere). Before this, Andersson had not made a feature film in 25 years, spending the interim directing television commercials. (The press notes for the film point out, a bit defensively, that Ingmar Bergman himself considers the ads the best in the world.)

The hiatus between projects is telling. Songs From the Second Floor unfurls with the fascistic precision of a Swiss clock, as every detail bears the imprint of an overeager director. By turns awesome and exasperating, the micromanaged, look-at-me mise-en-scene plays like a callow imitation of Tati. The movie gets some comic mileage out of its deft use of depth of field, as background details -- a squirming mental patient, a gaggle of flagellating businessmen -- constantly undercut the foreground action. The formal exactitude is breathtaking, to the point of suffocation. Fanatically keeping his camera bolted to the ground (I counted one dolly shot in the entire film -- and not one cut within a scene), Andersson constructs an oppressive, implacable cartoon.

As striking as Andersson's sensibility is, it is also not unfamiliar. Tati is but one of many in a compendium of influences that informs the movie's vision. The outsized sets recall Gilliam and Jeunet and Caro; the apocalyptic traffic jam is straight out of Godard; the metaphysical angst (not to mention the parade of flagellators) echoes Bergman; the gallery of grotesques seems inspired by Fellini. Shot by Istvan Borbas and Jesper Klevenas, the movie's chilly emptiness calls to mind the great Danish painter Vilhelm Hammershoi, who also served as a visual touchstone for another Scandinavian purveyor of spiritual angst, Carl Dreyer.

In its sacrilegiousness, the movie also reminds us of Buñuel -- but not enough. Absent is the blithe, impish spirit in Buñuel's movies, replaced by Scandinavian gloominess. There's hardly any hilarity in the film's black comedy, and what laughs there are come courtesy of obvious punchlines. A key difference too is that Buñuel's absurdist vision is more organic, more attuned to the rot in the world. Andersson, on the other hand, is too in love with the surreal, sneering bombast of his imagery; he seems more interested in the world in his head. In so repackaging reality, Andersson's gaudily fastidious orchestrations discourage resonant connections with our world.

Which is a shame, because his polemics do have an evanescent sting. Peopled by inconsequential company men and single-minded hawkers ("How can you make money on a crucified loser?" asks one disgruntled crucifix salesman), Songs sees consumerism and capitalism as the primary forces behind humanity's spiritual decline. The political critique may boilerplate and undercooked, but it does occasion some great sequences. In a key image, a line of old men make a dash to a ticket counter in some celestial airport, but never make it, foiled by the burden of their overstuffed baggage.

"How much can you ask of a person?" asks another of Andersson's damned. The movie may be harshly critical of the way we live now, but it's surprisingly sympathetic to the pain of being human. Its parade of grotesquerie notwithstanding, there is genuine anguish in Andersson's lament. Characters repeat lines like mantras. "Beloved is the one who sits down," says one enigmatically. "Beloved is the one who sweats out of pain or out of shame," says another. Invoking the beatitudes, the repetition of these lines and others gives the movie an incantatory power.

The admonition of Songs From the Second Floor is not that hell awaits us, but that it may already be here. If only Andersson's anguish were as indelible as his imagery. Songs is most memorable for its luxuriant absurdities, which distract us from its cosmic grapplings. Andersson may have been driven to make his movie by an earnest search for answers, but along the way, invention outstripped idea. By no means a failure, Songs is also not quite the tour de force it thinks it is. The movie may leave you with many images, but the one that sticks is that of Andersson staring admiringly at his imposing sets, an ardent humanist dazzled by his shiny new toys.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.