Reviews

Spider-Man 3 (2007)

The point of Spider-Man 3, underscored by all the posters, trailers, and buzz, is black Spidey.


Spider-Man 3

Director: Sam Raimi
Cast: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, James Franco, Thomas Haden Church, Topher Grace, Bryce Dallas Howard
Distributor: Sony
MPAA rating: PG-13
Studio: Sony
First date: 2007
US Release Date: 2007-05-04 (General release)
Website

The point of Spider-Man 3, underscored by all the posters, trailers, and buzz, is black Spidey. The opposite of the terminally naïve, perennially optimistic Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) and his buoyant, eager red-suited alter-ego, the black Spider-Man is pretty much what you expect: angsty, angry, and aggressive. The two selves make visible the split Peter endures as he faces adulthood, especially as he means to marry Mary Jane (Kirsten Dunst) while maintaining his secret career as much-ballyhooed superhero.

It's a struggle, this growing up business. You know that from the first two Sam Raimi films, and now you're going to know it again. Here it's complicated by Spider-Man's recent elevation to rock-stardom. Now the cityscape is lit up with billboards and headlines proclaiming Spidey love. Black Spider-Man (and we needn't underline the tediousness of this color for evil) has no love, but that's because he's something like a void, producing and consuming all Peter's insecurities, his fear of rejection, his need for acclaim, his forever guilt over Ben's death and his own selfishness. Craven and intense, black Spider-Man is as he indulges all that.

It helps that the film includes yet another black Spider-Man, a blacker black Spider-Man named Venom, whose raging and fretting finds a point of departure in Eddie (Topher Grace). That Eddie happens to be Peter's rival for the Daily Bugle staff photographer's job only exacerbates the multiplying of personae in 3. Eddie's blackness surfaces as Peter's recedes, but they serve as mirror images, reflecting each other's pain and desire. Eddie's blackness is also marked by a fiercely fangy face, not so cool and mysterious as Peter's mouthless incarnation, but more upfront about its deviltry and psychosis.

It's no accident that black Spidey is inaugurated during a romantic evening with MJ. They lie back gazing at perfect CGIed stars, resting on a perfect CGIed web he's spread between trees in Central Park, gushing how much they love each other. When they leave, a skritchy, webby black goo from outer space -- it arrives in some burning, crashing meteor -- crawls up onto Peter's motorbike and rides home with him, skulking in his one room apartment until one evening when he's alone and worrying. Then the goo crawls into his bed, over and into him, a parasite that "amplifies the characteristics of its host." Given Peter's current state, this is bad.

Black Spidey is possessed of all the red one's skills, focused through a combination of depression and weird cockiness. This after MJ breaks off with Peter, who's so upswept by his fame and fans that he's unable to see that her career has stalled. Though he's entranced by her Broadway debut -- she sings Irving Berlin's "They Say It's Wonderful" -- the critics rip her weak vocals. "They're just critics," assures Peter, placidly self-obsessing while wondering when to spring the engagement ring (supplied by patient Aunt May [Rosemary Harris]) he imagines will thrill MJ beyond her wildest dreams. The melodrama is contrived: because Peter can't sympathize, she turns to his other rival, Harry (James Franco), who has lost his own edgy fury at Peter and by extension MJ, following a memory-blotting head injury. Now he's sweet and sunny Harry again, all understanding and infinitely more appealing for a girl in need of loving than the vengeance-minded former Harry. At least for a minute.

Peter's monumental lack of understanding is a function of his celebrity. A parade honoring Spider-Man (red) provides all the adulation he might want, from swarming citizens and screaming girlies (and even a pop-in nod from Stan Lee, who observes on cue, "I guess one person can make a difference!"). Spider-Man is now The Man, no longer the outsider, but beloved and thronged by autograph seekers.

Among the fans is police chief's daughter Gwen (a brightly blond Bryce Dallas Howard), lately saved by Spider-Man and flirty with Peter (they're classmates at the university). When she hands him the key to the city, Peter suggests she kiss him while he hangs upside down, his own effort to juice the celebration. "It'll be really cool," he encourages her, while spectator MJ's face falls: this is her special secret Spidey moment, now reduced to camera-ready kitsch. Such recycling and self-awareness, on the film's part, nearly saves it from the careening disconnectedness that mostly pulls it apart -- too many plots, too many motivations, too many gimmicks.

Among the too-muchness is the third villain -- after Harry and Fanged-Up Eddie -- Sandman, a.k.a. Flint (Thomas Haden Church). An escaped convict trying to get together money for his sick child, he's rejected by his aggrieved wife (played by the wonderful Theresa Russell in a don't-blink-or-you'll-miss-it cameo). Sent into the cold night to fume and fret, Flint is zapped like Peter two films ago with a science-fictiony plot device. In Flint's case, a particle-parsing desert facility remakes him so he's literally made of sand, alternately pounding and porous, his literal ambiguity uncontainable, his Peter-like neediness gargantuan. Vulnerable and goofy in his cartoonishly out-of-date striped shirt, Flint's is motivation crassly sentimental, his villainy almost accidental.

The same might be said for the goo-infected Spider-Man, except that he appears to calculate. Just what he wants and how he's measuring success remain unclear, pretty delightfully in one sequence, where black Peter materializes, his hair shocked over his face like Hitler's, his very gait changed from tentative to brash. Mad at MJ, he descends into a grim sort of "cool," like a Jet from West Side Story, snapping his fingers and shooting his hands like guns at passing girls. They make faces and scurry away, but he's a complete treat, all nerdy self-love. Cut up into close shots of his swaggering torso and scheming eyes, the transformation has nothing to do with anything, except it's fun, the kind of madcap move-busting usually conjured by Bruce Campbell (who appears briefly as a faux French maître d').

In an utterly show-stopping moment, the too-cool-for-school Peter takes Gwen to the dingy club where MJ is singing: exploding into a demented, dancing-on-the-tables one-man-show, he suddenly finds an athletic grace on his feet he usually only displays in his web-slinging. But his impulse is all dark and desperate: willful and urgent, he means to devastate MJ at the expense of Gwen's sweet affection. He's a bully leaping like Gene Kelly, Peter punishing and unleashed and so unlike himself you share MJ's horror even as you delight in his lunacy.

But the fun is soon tamped down again, when Peter realizes his affront and the movie gets back to its moralizing intensity. It's no surprise that Spider-Man 3 means to comment on the world we know, that it's ruinous to pursue vengeance and trumped up causes, that forgiveness is not only much nobler but also healthier.

It's an obvious message (which doesn’t mean it's heeded, as throwdowns remain more exciting than ethical educations). Still, that message does go on and on, with deaths protracted and wounds metaphorical, the super-expensive special effects upping no antes. After 139 minutes, Spider-Man's onslaughty spectacles are less memorable than Peter's loopily incongruous dance number. Deftly expressive and insistent, black Peter's vigor is surprising even to him.

5

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less
6

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image