There's Still Much to Enjoy in 'Star Trek into Darkness'

Star Trek Into Darkness has never looked or sounded better than this new 4K UHD release, but it's hard to ignore that this is a big budget remake of Wrath of Khan.

Star Trek Into Darkness

Director: J.J. Abrams
Cast: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Karl Urban, Zoe Saldana, Simon Pegg, Bruce Greenwood, Alice Eve, Peter Weller, Benedict Cumberbatch, Leonard Nimoy, Bill Hader, Heather Langenkamp, Chris Hemsworth, Jennifer Morrison, Noel Clarke, Alice Eve
Length: 131 minutes
Studio: Paramount
Year: 2013
Distributor: Paramount
MPAA Rating: PG-13
UK Release Date:
US Release Date: 2016-06-14

Star Trek Beyond (2016), the third installment in the Star Trek reboot series comes out in theaters soon. Paramount is cross-promoting the film with new re-releases of the other two films in the saga, Star Trek (2009) and Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) in glorious 4K Ultra HD editions. Those buying the new 4K Blu Ray discs will be twice as excited to see Star Trek Beyond and those excited about Star Trek Beyond are that much more likely to go out and buy the 4K Blu Rays.

However, even as the price of Blu Ray has gone down, this new format carries quite a price tag. Buying both re-releases will cost you almost $100., Luckily each package contains three discs with the final being a treasure trove of bonus features from documentaries to gag reels to promotional material.

However, much of this is retained from older releases, so the main draw for this expensive re-release is the film itself presented with never before seen or heard picture and sound in a home theater format.

How is the film itself? Well, much of the “baggage” of the "Star Trek" name with the recast characters and alternate timeline was dealt with in the 2009 reboot film, and while there are still some lingering issues for longtime fans, there's still much to enjoy in Star Trek Into Darkness.

The film is pretty spectacular, with enthralling action sequences and stellar special effects (when you can make them out through director J.J. Abrams’ omnipresent lens flares). The cast manages to be even better this time out, more comfortable in their skins (which used to belong to other actors) and very natural. While still set in an alternate timeline, more attention is paid here to the original saga to show that before the reality-altering time-travel event this was still the Star Trek that we knew and loved.

In this second film, the stakes are higher. Almost immediately Star Trek Into Darkness remedies one of the biggest issues left in the wake of the first film, that being Cadet James T. Kirk (Chris Pine) being immediately promoted from trainee to Captain of the Federation’s flagship. After a botched assignment, Kirk is stripped of his command and sent back to Starfleet Academy because he is, as we already know, not ready yet. After a (somewhat heavy-handed and metaphorical) terrorist attack, however, Kirk, Spock (Zachary Quinto) and the perfectly cast Dr. McCoy (Karl Urban) are back on the Enterprise, chasing after the film’s main villain.

If it was ever a spoiler to reveal that this villain is actually the original saga’s “Khan”, that time has passed (the 4K release prints this fact right there on the box). However, it was a surprise to many to see that Khan, a Sikh superman, as established in the original series, is now played by lily white Englishman Benedict Cumberbatch. While Cumberbatch is a capable actor who gives an appropriately menacing performance as Khan Noonien Singh, it’s hard to ignore the fact that this Indian character (originally brought to life by Ricardo Montalban), is being played by a lily white Englishman. They even give him a white guy’s name as a disguise: John Harrison.

(Note: Yes, I realize that Ricardo Gonzalo Pedro Montalbán y Merino was not an Indian, but a Mexican actor himself, in this time when actors of color are having a harder time getting work, whitewashing this role is a notable indiscretion. The same sensitivity seemed to have gone into Alice Eve’s ill-advised bra and panties scene, shoved in haphazardly for gratuity’s sake.)

Along the way we get our first looks at the rebooted Klingons, a few huge surprises and a very exciting plot. While logic and mystery do often take a back seat to the more popcorn-oriented commercial elements that Paramount demanded for the new series, the cast and crew do take more pains to hew closer to the original formula here and action never quite takes the place of thought.

However, once the cat is officially out of the bag that this is a retelling of the story of Khan, the film quickly morphs into a virtual remake of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982). From that point forward the film becomes predictable and the plot becomes less a case of “what will happen” and more a question of how the same things will happen and to which largely interchangeable character.

To an extent, this is the exact approach Abrams would employ two years later at the helm of Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015) which, if you search your feelings, Luke, is very much a remake of Star Wars (1977). However, like Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Star Trek Into Darkness manages to rise above its derivative elements to become a pretty damned good movie and a hell of a lot of fun, to boot.

With the 4K Ultra HD treatment Star Trek Into Darkness has never looked or sounded better and with the extras included here, you’ve got one of the very best Star Trek packages ever released; the film and the extras are high quality and the disc collection is excellent. However the price tag of almost $50 would give even staunch collectors pause.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.