Stephen Malkmus & The Jicks: Real Emotional Trash

Long meandering jams coalesce into Stephen Malkmus' heaviest, most classic rock-influenced Jicks album yet, but where are the songs?

Stephen Malkmus and the Jicks

Real Emotional Trash

Contributors: Stephen Malkmus, Janet Weiss
Label: Matador
US Release Date: 2008-03-04
UK Release Date: 2008-03-04

Thick swaths of amplified electric guitar kick off Stephen Malkmus' fourth post-Pavement album (the second credited to the Jicks), a flashpot smoking, hash-redolent bit of 1970s rock homage that will put you in mind of Blue Cheer and Black Sabbath. It's a fitting start to a record that was, reportedly, built though free-form jam sessions with Malkmus, long-time Jicks Joanna Bolme and Mike Clark, and new recruit Janet Weiss hammering through the slow rhythms and serpentine flourishes of its extended, loosely structured cuts. But the thing about jams is that they're more fun for participants than they are for listeners. At some point, the groove has to turn into a song, or no one's going to want to listen.

Real Emotional Trash accomplishes this intermittently, but not every time, and Malkmus seems to know it. "Of all my stoned digressions / some have mutated into the truth," he observes, as the guitar haze of "Dragonfly Pie" briefly clears. Some is the key word here, because there are long stretches of digression here, and only occasional flashes of truth.

"Baltimore", the first single, is arguably the most successful at fusing Malkmus' outside-the-lines guitar playing with a memorable melody. It's huge washes of altered guitars and anxious clatter of drums are wed to a song that's almost folky, and built on measured, modal melodies. There's a break, mid-cut, where choppy chords punctuate a chorus and warm, viscous guitar runs crest and recede like a long-lost Thin Lizzy bridge. It's loosely strung, but never gets lost, not even in the jammy coda where everyone freaks, continuously, only to pull back into the central riff at the end. You can see how it might have been built on improvisation, but was later codified, cleaned up and made into an accessible package.

Similarly, "Cold Son" follows a thread of memorable melody, gaining tension out of its squiggly, space age keyboards and palm muted strums, but slicking it all over with the easy tunefulness of the chorus. And "Hopscotch Willie", where you can hear Ms. Weiss the best, slips in some glossy teardrop-shape blots of sound that will remind you of George Harrison. Now that the band is half girls, there are lots of pretty female harmonies and flourishes in the mix, wafting guitar-heavy interludes into pop.

The writing is clever as always, full of trippy ellipses, brightly colored metaphors and sudden flashes of insight. "Hopscotch Willie" and "Wicked Wanda", both not-so-far from Pavement's sound musically, construct line-drawn characters out of offhand alliterations. "Wicked wicked Wanda / I'd rather take Rwanda," deadpans Malkmus in the album's final track, limning the Hollywood heartless woman with "no time to accommodate." Malkmus takes a poke at his own "Do Not Feed the Oyster" in "Cold Son", asking, "Who was it that said, 'the world is your oyster'? / I feel like a nympho in a cloister." It's all very knowing and arch, but not labored over. You might, in conversation with a very smart, very funny, very stoned person who has suddenly started to rhyme.

Yet the longer tracks ("Elmo Delmo" and, particularly, the title cut) bog down in endless noodling. There's nothing wrong with the jam -- they're all skilled musicians and obviously enjoying things -- but it never goes anywhere. As Malkmus observes in the midst of "Real Emotional Trash", "The trail has two ruts / one is just a tunnel / the other is a funnel to the tune." If Real Emotional Trash falls short of Pig Lib, it's because we're spending too much time in the tunnel, and not enough in the funnel to the tune.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.