Strange Culture

Strange Culture presents Kurtz's bizarre legal and political predicament within layers of context, having to do with fears of terrorism and art, the Patriot Act and U.S. prosecutorial zealousness.

Strange Culture

Director: Lynn Hershman Leeson
Cast: Thomas Jay Ryan, Tilda Swinton, Peter Coyote, Steve Kurtz, Gregg Bordowitz, Beatriz Da Costa
Distributor: Docurama
MPAA rating: N/A
Studio: L5 productions
First date: 2007
US Release Date: 2007-10-05 (Limited release)
When people are living at a time of fear, they're willing consent to the abolition and restriction of their rights. The real issue is: What do we fear? Why do we fear it? Is the fear justified? What's happening today is nothing new. It is simply more dramatic and perhaps better publicized.

-- Susan Leeson, Constitutional Law Scholar

"We need to find a broader audience," urges Hope (Tilda Swinton). "So much is at stake now. People have to know what's happening in this country. It's too important to keep quiet." At this point in Strange Culture, Lynn Hershman Leeson's sharp, innovative film about post-9/11 anxieties and oppressions, you already know Hope Kurtz is dead. You also know that when she dies, in May 2004, her husband Steve, an artist, came under suspicion by the cops and FBI, not because she died of heart failure in her mid 40s, but because of FBI "protocol post 9/11."

Strange Culture presents Kurtz's bizarre legal and political predicament within layers of context, having to do with fears of terrorism and art, the Patriot Act and U.S. prosecutorial zealousness. Swinton plays Hope in scenes depicting the days before her death, and Thomas Jay Ryan plays Steve, then and now: "Actors," explains a title card, "have interpreted [Kurtz's] story because he is unable to comment on particular events. The film also includes interviews with the real Steve Kurtz (about selected events), as well as interviews with his friends and colleagues, artists and academics who have come together in his defense (this means raising funds as well as providing expert and emotional support). As Kurtz recounts the terrible turmoil of his life since 2004, he is at once contemplative and cynical, rueful and resistant.

The film offers one way to "find a broader audience" for his case, not for its own sake, because of what it means for the rest of us. Perhaps appropriately, it begins with TV, a Countdown story read by Keith Olbermann: "Like many an unfortunate drama, this one begins with a death." Police tape and officers, emergency vehicles pass through the handheld frame. Gregg Bordowitz, a friend of Steve's and fellow artist, who recalls, "I got a call that Hope died and that Steve was being interrogated and the house had been closed down." Steve Dietz, another friend and curator, sets a second layer of context: "The FBI comes in and you're accused of possibly having foul play. You're accused of doing things that are wrong, all on top of a very critical art practice. I think that the combination of bureaucratic and government coercion against his person, with the personal tragedy, is just a circle of hell."

As Dietz suggests, this circle affects and stems from Kurtz's person and his work. It happens that he's a founding member of Critical Art Ensemble, a group Kurtz describes as identifying "things that we think are counter to the advancement of social justice and then we try to do something about it. And we try to do something about it on a cultural level." In 2004, he was working with his wife (she was something of an editor for his projects) on a piece about genetically modified food. He was also consulting with a geneticist, Robert Ferrell, since charged along with Kurtz and also unable to speak, though Peter Coyote here reads a statement for him (about agribusiness bringing genetically modified foods into the food chain, without telling consumers and with government's "tacit approval").

The 2004 installation for Mass MoCA included physically harmless biotechnology experiments that Kurtz was assembling, with bacteria ordered over the internet, in his home. On entering the house to deal with Hope's body, the police discovered, in Olbermann's words, "Petri dishes and sophisticated scientific equipment." Further investigation, reenacted in Strange Culture, provided agents with still more anxiety-making details, an invitation to an art show that featured "Arabic writing," for instance (Kurtz notes the overreaction to this item, in legal terms at least). It wasn't long before Kurtz was arrested. At that point, the problem changed shape. As Bordowitz puts it, "The FBI saw an opportunity to establish precedent in a way that they could extend the government's powers into the university system, into academia, into the art world. They saw an opportunity and they ran with it."

Specifically, the government assigned Assistant U.S. Attorney William Hochul to the case, the prosecutor whose "great case was putting away the Lackawanna Six." Kurtz recalls being approached by strangers who first tried to buy drugs from him and then tried to get him to say he wanted to kill the president. A friend pulled Kurtz away, saying, "Those guys are so FBI." Such absurdity would be funny -- Kurtz smiles as he recounts it -- except that the charges of bioterrorism soon transmutated into charges of fraud (because the bacteria were purchased by mail), still pending, with no trial date set.

The film includes debates among actors playing Kurtz's former students, on being offered a chance to sign a petition in his support. Their own concerns color their decisions whether to sign, some feeling nervous about the government's inclination and capacity to come after them as well. "I'll say this out of fear," says one young man. "But it's a legitimate fear. I'm doing it because I'm scared for myself. You have a last name that sounds like Hussein, and you're already a suspect."

The arguments in Strange Culture are multiple and interconnected. Certainly, the question of what sorts of food you're eating, the question Kurtz started with, remains crucial. Coyote, as himself, adds, "The fact that the government is watching an art group whose subject happens to be transgenic foods is the real point here." And Ryan, as himself, observes, "The fact that the government can decide to take civil law conflicts and, at their discretion, make them into criminal charges when they so choose, is enormous."

While you have likely heard of NSA's warrantless surveillance and the secret "torture memo," Kurtz's story is less well publicized -- at least outside the realms of academics and artists. Crossing conventional boundaries of dramatization and documentary, Hershman Leeson's movie makes Kurtz's case available to "broader audience," showing the ways that various institutions -- science, government, agriculture, and the military -- work towards similar suspicious ends. If not conspiring, precisely, they do appear to have each others' backs in ways that citizens can't hope to counter -- unless they have access to information.


The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.