Stuart Little 2 (2002)

Tracy McLoone

With all the incessant action, 'SL2' feels like it's trying to be bigger than it is.

Stuart Little 2

Director: Rob Minkoff
Cast: voices of Michael J. Fox, Melanie Griffith, Jonathan Lipnicki, Geena Davis, Hugh Laurie, Nathan Lane, James Woods
MPAA rating: PG
Studio: Columbia Pictures
First date: 2002
US Release Date: 2002-07-19

It's difficult enough to make a successful film sequel, even harder when not working with a beloved children's story by E.B. White, as did the original Stuart Little (1999). Stuart Little 2 suffers for not having White's guiding influence (save for having characters that are "based on" his). And in the end, the movie does very little with these characters, focusing its attention instead on action and adventure.

Stuart Little 2 opens with an action sequence in the form of a soccer game. It's more adventurous than any regular little kids' game of soccer, because our favorite mouse, Stuart (voice of Michael J. Fox), is playing, and in addition to being about as big as the other players' feet, Stuart is much smaller than the soccer ball. His adoptive human mother (Geena Davis) is extremely nervous about the game, wishing her mouse son would stay away from dangerous sports and focus on dance or art, anything where Stuart is less likely to be squashed.

This first scene establishes some standard family dynamics, wherein Mom is overprotective and Dad (Hugh Laurie) recommends more freedom for his son. And Stuart is itching for more freedom; just because he's a mouse in a human world doesn't mean he should suffocate under an overbearing mother, or so he thinks. But if Mom isn't entirely wrong (Stuart could be killed by something as harmless to a human kid as a stray soccer ball), this trite gendered dynamic asks us repeatedly to side with Dad and Stuart. We wouldn't want Stuart to become some sort of a mama's boy, after all.

As if to underline the familiarity of all this, the film reunites the original's cast: in addition to Fox, Davis, and Laurie, Jonathan Lipnicki returns as the eldest Little son, George, and Nathan Lane as the family's wisecracking kitty Snowbell, only this time he's in league with Stuart rather than trying to run him out of the house. Newcomers include a Little baby girl, Martha (played by twins Ashley and Anna Hoelck), who is more of a prop than a character. Her apparent function -- besides being oh so cute -- is to position Stuart as a stereotypical middle child: he feels neglected even in the most loving of families.

And there's a little yellow bird Margalo (Melanie Griffith), who befriends Stuart just as the mouse is feeling left out of George's human world. The two come together in a dramatic car chase scene (Stuart drives a small model car to and from school) when Stuart sees the little bird trying to flee an evil falcon named Falcon (James Woods).

The story follows the friendship and developing interspecies romance of Stuart and Margalo. She is hiding some important secrets from Stuart, leading to double-crossing, adventure, and a series of highly unlikely events. Much of the film is filled with chase scenes, on foot, in model planes, in cars, and with the aforementioned birds in flight. There is not much time for the sweet absurdity that made Stuart Little so charming. (Apparently, everyone's over the strangeness of the premise -- that a human family should adopt a tiny white talking mouse and raise him as their son).

SL2 is kind of a kids' intro to the themes of film noir, complete with a duplicitous dame, a heavy, a jewel theft, and an imaginary New York peppered with deep shadows and glimmering lights. That's not say it isn't bright and lovely, too. In fact, the film is beautiful to watch, capturing the bittersweet tone of an idealized world that never was: a host of New Yorkers in Central Park wear color-coordinated clothing (the Littles always seem to be color-coordinated); the Littles still dwell in a charming row house with a garden, wedged between two skyscrapers; a mouse can fall in love with a bird.

Even so, despite its visual beauty, Stuart Little 2 is trying too hard to fit into too many genres: adventure, family melodrama, noir, and comedy -- and to be kid-friendly as well. The ads trumpet, "You're as big as you feel." With all the incessant action, SL2 feels like it's trying to be bigger than it is.

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.