Supergirl: Season 1, Episode 6 - "Red Faced"

Gregory L. Reece

Supergirl is at its best when it maintains a nice balance between earnest but absurd superheroics and lightly drawn and funny human drama; in other words, between robot fights and game night.


Airtime: Mondays, 8 pm
Cast: Melissa Benoist, Jeremy Jordan, Iddo Goldberg, Calista Flockhart, Peter Facinelli, Jenna Dewan Tatum, Glenn Morshower, Chyler Leigh, Mehcad Brooks
Subtitle: Season 1, Episode 6 - "Red Faced"
Network: CBS
Air date: 2015-11-30

"Does the robot fight mean that game night's cancelled?" Winn (Jeremy Jordan) asks Kara/Supergirl (Melissa Benoist) in the latest episode of the new CBS series.

"No," Kara replies. "No. Game night is the last shred of normalcy that remains in our crime stopping, alien hunting, D.E.O. hacking lives. Game night survives. It has to."

That delightful interaction is a pretty good example of what makes Supergirl a treat. Like its sister program, the still-superior The Flash, Supergirl is at its best when it maintains a nice balance between earnest but absurd superheroics and lightly drawn and funny human drama. This balance is the secret to the success of Greg Berlanti's superhero TV universe, a universe that also includes Arrow and the upcoming Legends of Tomorrow, which air alongside the The Flash on CW.

Robot fights and game nights.

The robot fight, at least in this episode, is to be taken literally. Supergirl is called upon by the military to engage in a test battle with a humanoid robot designed to challenge hostile aliens. The battle, of course, goes wrong, and the robot and his creator end up posing a threat to National City, a threat that Supergirl has to confront.

For longtime fans of DC Comics' Justice League of America (JLA), the robot menace will be a familiar one. The Red Tornado, created by Gardner Fox and Dick Dillin, made his first appearance in that magazine back in 1968. Although he was at first a villain, he soon joined the ranks of the JLA, serving as their resident android hero and as a counterpoint to the more successful android Avenger, the Vision, over at Marvel Comics. I always liked the Red Tornado, even though he was pretty moody for an android, and always seemed to make stupid mistakes that caused more trouble for the team. (The Tornado was later given an elaborate backstory I won't go into here.)

Supergirl's Red Tornado (played by Iddo Goldberg) is a pretty good version of the character. Once again, however, he suffers in comparison to Marvel's Vision, featured in Marvel's Avengers: Age of Ultron summer blockbuster. I’d seen some promotional stills of the Tornado beforehand and was pretty worried, but digital enhancements worked their magic and made the character look a lot better in the final version. Unfortunately, the Tornado doesn’t get the chance for much development, and serves mostly as a punching bag for Supergirl as she works out her anger issues. Here's hoping that the character, and his nefarious creator T. O. Morrow (also played by Iddo Goldberg), will get a chance for a return engagement. I would love to see the character's moody melodrama added into the mix.

While the robotic villain is, of course, literally red-faced, the title of this episode is equally descriptive of the "game night" side of the story. Kara/Supergirl is having a lot of trouble controlling her temper, both in battles with robot menaces and at work. As a matter of fact, for as much as the Supergirl/Red Tornado battles were fun to watch, it was even more fun to see Kara raise her voice at her boss, Cat Grant (Calista Flockhart). Once again, Flockhart is given the very best scenes in this episode as she goes toe-to-toe with her overbearingly successful mother (Joan Julie Buck) and proves to be a kind and caring mentor to Kara. Cat's advice to Kara is a game changer for the hero, who learns to control her anger after uncovering its roots.

This being a superhero drama, the source of Supergirl's anger is found in her relationship with her parents. I suppose we can thank Batman and Spider-Man for providing super origin stories that place parent/child relationships as the central motivating factor for the hero's birth and mission.

Indeed, in "Red Faced", parent issues are everywhere. In throwaway lines, Winn and Maxwell Lord (Peter Facinelli) confess their parent issues. Lucy Lane (Jenna Dewan Tatum) struggles to gain independence from her overbearing father (Glenn Morshower). Cat has that thing with her mom. Alex (Chyler Leigh) digs up more secrets about her missing father (Dean Cain). The Red Tornado and his creator play out their own version of a father/son drama. And Kara digs deep into her anger and realizes that her parents' decision to put her in that rocket and launch her into space continues to shape her destiny in ways that she can't control.

Just as there’s a literal robot in this issue, the game night’s for real, too. Kara, Winn, Lucy, and James (Mehcad Brooks) get to have a bit of fun that also manages to reveal more of the relationship dynamics between these four characters. Winn, forgetting that Lucy doesn’t know about Kara's secret identity, almost divulges more than he should. I thought for a moment that Kara was going to invite Cat to the party. I wish she had. Maybe she will.

Overall, "Red Faced" is a lot of fun. The balance between special effects adventuring and human drama is pretty near perfect.

As it turns out, this Supergirl can do it all: stand her ground with her boss and with a humanoid killing machine, fetch hangover meds for Cat and save schoolchildren from a reckless driver, work out her anger on a punching bag (OK, so it’s a car suspended by its bumper), and use that anger to blast the villain with heat vision.

In this episode, Supergirl flies high, punches hard, breathes ice, and shoots lasers out of her eyes.

But game night? Game night survives.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.