Superman: Red Son #1

Ryan Paul

While an interesting diversion and exercise in possibilities and imagination, Millar's book doesn't really tell us anything we didn't already know about these characters.


Publisher: DC Comics
Subtitle: Red Son #1
Contributors: Dave Johnson (Artists), Andrew Robinson (Artists), Paul Mounts. (Artists)
Price: $5.95
Writer: Mark Millar
Item Type: Comic
Length: 48
Publication Date: 2003-05

Nature vs. Nurture

Historical fiction is a strange beast, one I've never quite understood. Some people love reading fictional accounts of the lives of Civil War generals, Revolutionary War heroes, ancient Roman gladiators, and so on. It's not my cup of tea, but to each his own. Comic books, however, have a particularly interesting sub-genre that one might label as "historical fiction" of a sort. Since most comics are fictional to begin with, perhaps we should call it "fictional historical fiction", or, to crib the name of a defunct Marvel series, "what if?" stories. These stories ask "what would have happened if" something small in the accepted continuity of the comic book universe had been changed just a bit. What if Batman met up with Edgar Allen Poe? What if Iron Man decided to take over the world?

Every now and again, these sorts of stories gain a good bit of popularity. Marvel's What If? series had a good run before it was cancelled for slowing sales, and then in a surge of nostalgia it was started anew, although it soon went through the same cycle. Currently Marvel publishes Exiles, a spin on the "what if?" genre that features a recurring cast of characters from the standard Marvel Universe traveling to "alternate" realities. It has managed to hold a stronger readership than What If? ever did, but it too is losing steam after the departure of series creator Judd Winick. DC takes perhaps a smarter route, occasionally publishing their out-of-continuity stories, such as Millar's Superman: Red Son, under their ElseWorlds imprint rather than devote resources to an ongoing monthly series.

And it is a smarter story than most of its brethren. Millar tries to examine, in the most realistic terms possible, just what would have happened if that little escape pod from the doomed planet Krypton had landed on Earth just 12 hours later, smack dab in the Ukraine instead of Smallville. What if the "Man of Steel" were the Man of the Iron Curtain?

Millar's comic is full of Easter Eggs that hardcore DC fans will love. The title plays on both Superman's new Communist nature, and the red sun of his home planet, Krypton. The "Man of Steel" of this comic is someone unexpected-- Josef Stalin, whose name apparently translates into that familiar phrase. Millar also writes alternate versions of such beloved characters as Lois Lane, Jimmy Olsen, and Lana Lang. The romance between Superman and Wonder Woman that always seemed just under the surface in standard DC continuity gets a chance to blossom when she visits the Soviet Union. New origins for Bizarro Superman and Batman put a significant twist on their characters, and Batman especially promises to be an intriguing figure in the upcoming issues of this three-part mini-series. But the unexpected star of the issue has to be Lex Luthor, the not-so-evil genius who gets to utter the most prized line of dialogue in the whole book that will sure to have comics fans giggling the world over: "I honestly believe that Superman and I would have been the best of friends if he'd popped up in America."

Still, Millar offers more than just in-jokes for longtime fans. He makes a subtle, yet powerful, statement on the old argument of nature vs. nurture. Is Superman a Communist? Yes. Does he work for the U.S.A.'s most dangerous enemy? Yes. Is he a villain? No. He's a good guy, perhaps the only truly good guy in the book. He's a hero, not just to Soviets, but to Americans, Britons, anyone in need. Just like the Superman we all know, this Superman has a core of common decency and goodness that politics can't touch, and perhaps a bit of the naiveté that our Superman always seemed to have. (How else could one explain him working for a man responsible for thousands upon thousands of murders, executions, and pogroms?) When Superman first sees Lois, there's a moment, a brief moment, that demonstrates the cosmic connection between these two characters, now on opposite sides of the world. Finally, while he may seem like a decent guy at first, Lex Luthor eventually shows his true colors. Once a megalomaniac, always a megalomaniac.

So, as a character study, Millar provides an intriguing story. He changes everything about the world, but very little about the true core of these characters. He strips them down to their bare essentials, demonstrating what has made them icons of pop culture for 50-plus years, and why Superman is Superman no matter what side of the fence he's on.

It all begs one question though: "What's the point?" For Marvel, Millar writes The Ultimates, a revamping of some of Marvel's central characters that not only redefines them, but puts them in a militarized world context to which a post-9/11 reader can relate. Red Son demonstrates the true nature of Superman. It is a strong character study. But how does it relate to the reader, to the reader's world? While an interesting diversion and exercise in possibilities and imagination, Millar's book doesn't really tell us anything we didn't already know about these characters. There is no new insight to their world, or to ours.

Of course, there are still two issues to go, so perhaps Millar will surprise me and give me something grand when all is said and done, but the criticism still stands. Despite what some might want to believe, comics are a struggling industry, with little sign that they are being taken more seriously by the mainstream. While movies like X2 and Spider-Man may be a hit, anyone who is inspired to hit the comic book store will likely find the same insular materials, aimed at a hardcore audience who "knows what they likes and likes what they knows". The same self-consuming, repetitive, circular material isn't the key to gaining a new audience and respect; material that goes someplace different is. Red Son, while an example of such material that is good and entertaining, is still just the same fanboy-oriented product that the major publishers have been putting out forever. We know the characters, we know who they are. We don't need to be told again and again that Superman is a true hero and Lex Luthor is a true villain. It's time to abandon the nature we all know. It is time for writers like Mark Millar, who certainly has the talent, to nurture something new to take comics into a new millennium.

So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.