Supernatural: Season 11, Episode 21 - "All in the Family"

Jessy Krupa

As the season 11 finale looms, Supernatural seems to be subtextually analyzing its relationship with its fans.


Airtime: Wednesdays, 8pm
Cast: Jensen Ackles, Jared Padalecki, Misha Collins, Mark A. Sheppard
Subtitle: Season 11, Episode 21 - "All in the Family"
Network: CW
Air date: 2016-05-11

"We're not asking you to believe that this is true, just act like you do. People do it all the time."

-- Dean Winchester (Jensen Ackles) to Donatello Redfield (Keith Szarabajka)

That quote pretty much sums up this week's episode of Supernatural, as the show's fans have been separated into two distinct groups since last week's possibly series-changing reveal that Chuck (Rob Benedict) is God. Some fans loved the twist, believing that casting the most supreme being in the universe as a relatable human dork is clever and in keeping with Supernatural's overall aesthetic. Others think that God should be more God-like, played by someone with a more serious, commanding presence.

One could make the argument that the pro-Chuck fans are represented by Sam (Jared Padalecki) and the anti-Chuck fans by Dean in "All In The Family". The episode opens with Sam and Dean, fresh on the heels on the news, attempting to process this revelation and ask Chuck/God some badly needed questions. Sam, accused of being too eager by his brother, is understandably nervous, excited, and impressed.

Dean, on the other hand, acts indifferent and accusatory in his questioning, with his anger at God for not showing up earlier turning into tears. Sam's surprised to hear that Chuck/God (who's staying at their bunker) takes showers and naps, while Dean's not above telling Him to stop singing late at night and to put some pants on later on that day. Pretty much the only thing the brothers agree upon in the episode in happiness at seeing fan-favorite character Kevin (Osric Chau) at peace and beamed into Heaven after living on earth as a ghost since season nine.

The parallels don't stop there, however, as we later meet Donatello Redfield, an atheist chemistry professor turned prophet of God after surviving Amara's (Emily Swallow) latest batch of dark cloud virus. Donatello states multiple times that he doesn't believe in any of things he's recently seen, because they defy logic and common sense. (A common fan complaint during this season in particular.) When Metatron (Curtis Armstrong) tells the Winchesters God's plan to sacrifice Himself to the Darkness in order to save the universe, Sam huffs, "Do you really expect us to buy this?" as if he was debating the ridiculousness of such a plot point.

One could even make the argument that during Amara's overly long conversation with Dean, in which she questions why her and Dean just can't be together if they both have feelings for each other, that she's just echoing the romantic sentiments of all "shippers". (Although, for some reason, I haven't heard of a single fan yet that wants to see those two together.)

Still, the episode wasn't all exposition, as two major plot points were advanced. Metatron actually sacrificed himself (and is now presumably dead) by trying to destroy Amara. He was a part of Chuck, Donatello, and the Winchesters' rescue of Castiel/Lucifer (Misha Collins), who was nearly tortured to death by the Darkness. Chuck even healed Castiel's body, leaving us to wonder whether or not He actually exorcised Lucifer (Mark Pellegrino) out as well.

The Amara drama continues next week on Supernatural, as Rowena (Ruth Connell) and Crowley (Mark Sheppard) team up with God and the Winchesters to stop Amara. That's bound to end well.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.