The Good Parents by Joan London

David Pullar

In the same way that Laura Palmer became largely irrelevant to the story of Twin Peaks, so the missing Maya is somewhat tangential from the moment she skips town.

The Good Parents

Publisher: Random House, Australia
Formats: Paperback
ISBN: 1741667933
Author: Joan London
Australia release date: 2008-01

If the nature of parenthood seems like an ambitious topic for any novel, it’s certainly a surprise to find it as the central theme of an otherwise unambitious book. The questions driving Joan London’s The Good Parents -- what is “good” parenting and are its results also “good” -- seem poor fits for a book that’s stylistically simple and rather conventional.

The Good Parents is London’s second novel, following Gilgamesh, which won an impressive array of prizes back in 2001. It opens with a young girl, Maya De Jong, newly arrived in the city from a rural Western Australian town. Maya works for a mysterious small company and has fallen under the sway of her equally shady and enigmatic boss, Maynard. It’s giving away little of the plot to say that she soon enough disappears with her employer.

Maya’s parents arrive for a visit, only to find an empty room and few clues to Maya’s whereabouts. They mostly spend the rest of the novel waiting for her to come back, while the reader is treated to flashbacks from their own lives. When you think about it, this makes the flashbacks rather like the half-time entertainment in a football match.

It also places the focus squarely on the characters of the parents. In the same way that Laura Palmer became largely irrelevant to the story of Twin Peaks, so the missing Maya is somewhat tangential from the moment she skips town. Maya’s life and decisions are mostly devices to force Toni and Jacob to re-evaluate their own choices and pasts.

Toni and Jacob are presented to the reader as the classic Baby Boomers: born in the early '50s, awakened by the sexual and herbal options of the late '60s, and settled into a quiet life of vague non-conformity by the '90s. Their path through life is a familiar one and sadly, not a very interesting one.

Rebellion for Jacob consists of a little bit of pot, a dash of voyeurism and a heady dose of Tolstoy -- Timothy Leary he is not. Toni goes further by marrying a mobster, but even then she seems to be able to do it in a surprisingly mundane way. The two of them eventually meet, fall into a kind of love and settle into child-rearing in a small wheat-belt town. This would be a diminution of pace where it not for the fact that they didn’t seem to be going anywhere beforehand.

London’s style is mostly the issue. She is heavy on description -- even to the point of overload in the early chapters -- yet sparing with metaphor or poetry. As a result what might otherwise have been a languid, dreamy narrative, reminiscent of the pace of rural life, ends up as merely dull. There is simply not enough flair in the writing to make up for the sluggishness of the plot.

Unfortunately, the undistinguished prose detracts from the interesting themes London touches on: the generation gap and the challenge of parenthood. The Boomer narrative has been told over and over, but The Good Parents sets out to explore its echoes in the next generation. Every generation has its distinctives and its repetitions of previous groups. By contrasting Maya’s story with those of her parents, London draws out these similarities and differences.

The Boomers are widely regarded (mostly by themselves) as a rebellious generation -- overthrowing a repressive conservatism to usher in a new age of self-discovery, peace and love. The fact that this new age was little more than a mirage and that the Boomers went on to embrace the capitalism-gone-wild of recent decades has done little to dent this self-perception.

The new generation, Generation Y to the marketers, seems to be less revolution-minded. Certainly we live in more permissive times and it may be that there is less to rebel against for the young. Yet the children of the Baby Boomers have still gone through the process of bucking parental authority.

For Boomers like Toni and Jacob, this is confusing. In their own optimistic youth, they swore to be different to their parents -- less uptight, more compassionate. “Good”, in a word. They felt that by rejecting the aloofness and reserve of their own parents, that they could help their kids bypass the awkward nest-leaving of their own generation.

While Toni and Jacob’s style was different to that of their own parents, the outcomes seem to be unfortunately similar. Maya’s attachment to her selfish, dysfunctional boss is little different to her mother’s own inappropriate teenage relationship. And son Magnus’ immersion in the world of music is reminiscent of his Jacob’s introverted Tolstoy fixation.

This echoes the larger theme of Boomer decline and the failure of the social revolution. For all the promise of the '60s and '70s, the cries for peace have failed to prevent further tragic wars, the pleas for equality have not eliminated discrimination and consciousness-raising has proven less popular than crass materialism.

In the post-hippie world, the best many could hope for was to instigate change in their own homes and communities through small splashes of counter-culture. For Toni and Jacob, this is through their approach to parenting. Odd as it may seem, the goal of these old rebels seems to have been removing the need for revolution in the next generation.

With Maya’s disappearance and their own “goodness” shown to be ineffective, our protagonists are cut adrift and spend the novel aimlessly trying to regain their purpose. They never find it and it’s a shame that we care so little whether they do.

As with so many sociologically-inclined novels, there are interesting ideas hidden in uninspiring text. And if there are better novels written on the subject (and in this case there are), that leaves very little reason to take it off the shelf.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.