The Hills Have Eyes 2 (2007)

The yucky desert mutants have resurfaced, this time in search of females for breeding.

The Hills Have Eyes 2

Director: Martin Weisz
Cast: Jessica Stroup, Reshad Strik, Michael McMillian, Daniella Alonso, Lee Thompson Young, Eric Edelstein
MPAA rating: R
Studio: Fox Atomic
First date: 2007
US Release Date: 2007-03-23 (General release)
If major changes are not made, the Guard and Reserve, the capability to carry out their missions, will continue to deteriorate. And it will go down, down, down. They will be less and less ready, and we will be taking more and more risks.

-- Retired Marine Corps Major General Arnold J. Punaro (McClatchy Newspapers, 1 March 2007)

They'll keep you alive for breeding, trying to get their numbers back up.

-- Kober (Jeff Kober), The Hills Have Eyes 2

The yucky desert mutants have resurfaced, this time in search of females for breeding. Their all-male tribalism -- here a sign of deviance -- is underlined in the first scene of The Hills Have Eyes 2, in which a non-mutant- looking woman gives extremely painful birth to a baby (animatronic, very ugly, very bloody). Exhausted and relieved to be done, she looks up at her minder, a hulking mutant seen only from the back, who promptly whacks her in the head with a large, lethal implement.

The mutant community's apparent misogyny is then juxtaposed with the coed National Guard. The human unit is involved in brutal activity as well -- they're training in a desert area that passes for "Kandahar," realm of multiple explosions and jaggedy camerawork -- they interact with girls, even seeming to treat them as "equals." Not only does the unit include two female members, but the group is soon accosted by an "Afghan" woman in black burqa, wailing about the babies they've killed. As they make an attempt to comfort her, she opens her robe to reveal... a bomb!

The kids' hard-ass sergeant, Millstone (Flex Alexander), proceeds to chew them out for bad prep and bad execution, reminding them that they've got much more difficult work ahead of them, when they deploy to the Middle East and meet up with folks who really really don't want them there. Before that, however, they're going to spend a few days in New Mexico, where they're assigned to look after a team of researchers. Here they will meet the cannibalistic mutants, who actually don't mind their invasion, as it provides food and females.

The pretend-Afghan location is pretty much the extent of Hills Have Eyes 2's overt commentary on the current U.S. wars policy, though it does include an anti-war Guardsman, PFC "Napoleon" Napoli (Michael McMillian), whom the sergeant snidely calls "Doonesebury" (suggesting the screenwriters are literate, at least). En route to the New Mexico site, he reminds his fellows that the president has been lying about reasons for war, as has the government for decades concerning the nuclear testing in the desert. Thus he anticipates the mutants' basic problem, that they were irradiated, then abandoned, and so have been cultivating and passing on their anger since the 1950s. By the time the Guard arrives, this rage has reached something of a fever pitch.

The troops have heard the rumors, of course, that Section 16 was a test area. But even as they might imagine, Aliens-like, that their mission is a "bug hunt," they can't anticipate the survivalist, voracious cleverness of the descendents of radiation victims. Neither can they guess that the mutants are seeking especial vengeance against the able-bodied, and especially, the pretty -- for every one of the trainees could be a fashion model.

As soon as they arrive, the kids are pictured in frames approximating the "hills"' perspective (they have eyes, etc.) But it's hard to be nervous for them, as they act out in such conventional ways. Along with the macho hothead Private "Crank" (Jacob Vargas) and overweight, always nervous Cpl. "Splitter" (Eric Edelstein), the team is graced with a sniper supreme, Delmar (Thompson Young), whose calm-under-duress is increasingly admirable. The premise here, that the mutants perform as "insurgents," surprisingly adept, organized, relentless, and equipped, leaves the trainees looking under-prepared: not enough intel, recon, or weaponry, not to mention armor, as they have apparently no idea how to fight the insidious intimacy of the mutants' favorite attack strategy, by penetrating and severing.

Battles with the mutants result in all manner of bodily abuse (and the mutants arrive looking mightily pre-abused, their heads and limbs misshapen, one passing like a chameleon for rocks, another very curiously wearing spectacles). After a couple of encounters, the troops smarten up, understanding the mutants' primary desire and using the girls as bait. But as soon as single Latina mom Missy (Daniella Alonso) and gorgeous blond Amber (Jessica Stroup, whose makeup never seems to run, no matter the heat, sweat, or blood) appear to cry in order to draw fire, the group's self-congratulations are stopped when Missy actually goes missing, dragged down inside the mines occupied by the mutants, so that the movie suddenly converts from exterior battle scenes to rip-off of the far superior Descent.

This team's descent, in an effort to recover Missy, is soon revealed as cockamamie: they're no longer trained fighters with automatic guns but victims in a splatter movie, walking into hellatious traps and reacting to gooey mutant faces (one mutant, apparently blind, comes with glasses, remnant of the civilization they've transcended). While they're pairing off and getting lost, Missy undergoes the most unpleasant ordeal. Immediately slammed against a table in preparation for a mutant named "Letch" (Jason Oettle) in the credits, she endures assaults by his gargantuan tongue, his ejaculate-looking spittle, and his actual penis (the sight of which you are spared, though you do see her horrified face as he thrusts). Gruesome and repulsive, the rape scene leads to her logical shock, mostly motivates her eventual mindless and more-trouble-causing revenge. Girls! They just can't keep focus.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.