The Killers: Wonderful Wonderful

Photo: Erik Weiss

It will never go down as anyone's favorite Killers album, but this is easily the most fun the Vegas rockers have had in years.

The Killers

Wonderful Wonderful

Label: Island
US Release Date: 2017-09-22
UK Release Date: 2017-09-22

The Killers were in need of redemption.

While glittery rock numbers like "Somebody Told Me" and "Mr. Brightside" remain karaoke staples to this day, the Brandon Flowers-fronted band has done a remarkable job in the past several years of whittling down their fanbase to nothing but the absolute core. Yes, 2012's Battle Born debuted high on the charts and helped sell a bunch of tour tickets, but it was also their most critically ravaged release to date, and still their lowest-selling album by a Vegas mile, resulting in zero performing singles from a band that was known for delectable, danceable singles. After mixing blue-collar rock wisdom with some of their more ambitious songs to date on the cult classic that is 2006's Sam's Town, no one wanted to stick around and listen to a whole album of homogeneous Springsteen cosplay.

Hence the five-year break. The various solo projects. The greatest hits compilation. These were all signs of a band that had hit a wall, both commercially and creatively.

So how wonderful is it then to find an album called Wonderful Wonderful that features the Killers do one thing that no one thought they were capable of: being funny.

Reuniting with longtime producer Jacknife Lee, the Killers have this time out gone for something they haven't tried since their debut: a genuine pop-rock hybrid. Of course, in the Killersverse, this just means alternating between guitar-heavy numbers and synth-driven light dance pieces in equal step, but there's nothing wrong with hitting those marks. Although Wonderful Wonderful's title track/album opener is far and away the worst thing on here -- a hazy mess of pretentious lyrics ("Motherless child does thou believe / That thine afflictions have caused us to grieve?") and classic rock idioms repurposed just for the heck of it (Dave Keuning's chorus being one single chord strum away from turning into Fleetwood Mac's "The Chain") -- there's still a good deal of fun to be had, with Ronnie Vannucci, Jr.'s Bohnham-inspired drumming positively exploding out of your subwoofer. It's a producer's track for sure, but it's a nice defusing of fans' expectations, as nothing on the rest of the LP sounds remotely like it.

Case in point: "The Man". A bold choice for a lead single that is nothing but cartoonish braggadocio mixed with action-movie guitars, this odd-but-impactful number features Flowers' wafer-thin voice hitting straining high notes while spitting out lines like "They kiss on the ring, I carry the crown / Nothing can break, nothing can break me down." Unlike some of the self-aggrandizing statements he's made in the past (both on record and in the press), this time it feels like he's in on the joke, stacking up vocals to deliver the second verse punchline of how he's "USDA certified lean", and goodness it actually works.

The album is peppered with surprising little moments like this. The second single "Run for Cover", similarly, rides a some furiously strummed riffs to launch into one of the most genuinely comedic sets of lyrics Flowers has ever tossed out. Some of his punchlines deal with the insufferability of celebrities ("It's hard to pack the car when all you do is shame us / It's even harder when the dirtbag's famous", delivered with a snotty attitude straight out of '90s pop-punk) to trusting said dirtbags with your heart ("He got a big smile! / He's fake news!"). It's almost disarming how fun "Run for Cover" is, just as how "Rut" can be argued as their most unabashed stab at '80s idol worship to date, this time mining Phil Collins in both presentation and execution. Yes, this leads to a lot of heightened, saccharine drama, but no longer are they posing like what they're doing is high art. By embracing these eccentricities, the band is showing some genuine strut in their step, making for a very welcome change of pace.

Please don't ad block PopMatters.

We are wholly independent, with no corporate backers.

Simply whitelisting PopMatters is a show of support.

Thank you.

Yet in goofing on all of these inspirations (instead of merely repurposing them), the band sometimes falls back on worn tropes, with tracks like the MOR "Life to Come", the repetitious and generic ballad "Some Kind of Love", and the more synth-driven "Tyson vs. Douglas" proving remarkably forgettable when rubbing up against such clear and obvious highlights like "Out of My Mind", itself moving closer to Erasure-styled emotional dance-pop than anything approaching traditional pop-rock. "Take the needle off the record," Flowers pleads on that number, "I can't stand another chorus / About Juliet's control over mystified mankind."

Lines like that are telling, as on their own B-sides/rarities comp from 2007, the group was right there covering Dire Straits' "Romeo & Juliet", another fame-biting tale of love found and then rejected. Flowers approaches similar themes on Wonderful Wonderful but has the most fun putting his own spin on them. Closer "Have All the Songs Been Written?" feels more like an obligatory inspirational song than something that the band cares about, while the track that precedes it, "The Calling", goes absolutely Biblical in its lyrics, at times reverent and at times sneering, making for one of the most genuinely weird numbers the rockers have ever produced (which is why you hear Woody Harrelson reading verses during its intro).

These two sides of the band fighting against each other -- the expected and the obscure -- make for a half-great listening experience, but one that's leaps and bounds more entertaining than Battle Born. Best of all, Wonderful Wonderful is the sound of a band rediscovering why they're even making music in the first place, embracing their eccentricities instead of merely playing into what's expected of them. It will never be anyone's favorite Killers album, but it's the most fun we've had with them in years, and a hopeful sign of truly wonderful things yet to come.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.