The National Lights: The Dead Will Walk, Dear

Dan Raper

Softly padding folk music from small-town America that, if only it was a touch better, could be described as haunting.

The National Lights

The Dead Will Walk, Dear

Label: BloodShake
US Release Date: 2007-02-27
UK Release Date: Available as import

It seems the term "folk" has become so bastardized by a media too lazy to take the time to really categorize it properly, that people are labeling as "slowcore" some pretty middle-of-the-road groups. Whether it's a blog-fueled effort at inspiring interest in a listening public already overrun with too many singer-songwriter options (what Wikipedia would call journalistic shorthand) we've almost run out of words to describe folk-related music. Doesn't slowcore imply some kind of intense, burning melancholy, something a band like Devstations (or really, Nick Cave) approach? Doesn't slowcore imply instability, some long drawn-out (perhaps self-inflicted) violence? Maybe it's just my overactive imagination.

The 10 songs of the National Lights' debut CD, The Dead Will Walk, Dear, flow by in less than half an hour -- a half hour of solemnity and calm to the tune of tambourine, organ, banjo, E-bow and lap-steel guitar. These instruments are truly folk, and this music is more traditional folk than anything else. Yet we think we need some other language, some other modernization, to differentiate this music from the quagmire of Amy Millans and My Brightest Diamonds and Joanna Newsoms and Regina Spektors all trying to carve their own spaces out of those four letters. Either way, the National Lights are not slowcore. Anything but -- these songs have barely the backbone to hold up a couple minutes' length, let alone a burning heart of desire or sadness. They float like a leaf falling on a backwoods stream, and this fey quality's not always terrible; it just marks a stubborn adherence to a form best reserved for campfires, and people with beards.

As may be expected from the length of the disc as a whole, the best songs on the album are over too quickly. "The Dead Will Walk" is so simple, with a strummed acoustic guitar and male-female block harmony, but so effective; the song blossoms easily with banjo and strings before ending just like that. "O, Ohio" sketches another familiar melody in a quietly authoritative way; meanwhile, the lyrics of leaving a no-longer home may surreptitiously hit you, harder than imagined.

Jacob Thomas Bern's voice is a bit too smoky to really be universally appealing, and it's not strangled enough to be really indie. In the end it's evocative enough, if nothing particularly more than that. The other contributors vocally are Kiehne and Sonya Cotton, the latter of whom has worked with Sufjan Stevens in the past, a fact less interesting than her pure, ethereal voice. But vocal beauty alone, here as elsewhere, can't make an album. And songs can be minimal without their impacts being that way as well -- we just need to look the way of Jose Gonzalez to figure that out. "Riverbed", one example of simplicity for its' own sake, repeats a 1-4-5 progression on the electric organ so many times the whole thing becomes utterly predictable. And a few of the pieces here seem misplaced. Opener "Better For It, Kid" (the "it" of the title being dead, btw) has such gravity, especially when Berns croons, "you're better for love", the song feels like a conclusion.

Despite these debut-album missteps, the National Lights do a fine job of sticking to the themes that define them: small town blues, death, and love. This is depressing stuff; but the choice of traditional folk as the medium of this communication lightens the impact, creating a series of short, quick-passing compositions. If the band learned to express these sturdy themes in a more varied musical language, it would likely have something more lasting than The Dead Will Walk, Dear.

Listen to "Midwest Town"


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.