The Prize Fighter Inferno: My Brothers Blood Machine

Coheed and Cambria's Claudio Sanchez has written some decent enough songs for his new project, but it's the clumsy attempts to tie it to the Coheed mythology that doom it to mediocrity.

The Prize Fighter Inferno

My Brother's Blood Machine

Label: Equal Vision
US Release Date: 2006-10-31
UK Release Date: 2006-10-30

Coheed and Cambria is not just a band, it's an experience. Sure, a listener who allows a Coheed and Cambria album into her headphones can concentrate on the music -- to hear Coheed and Cambria is to hear the modern sound of prog, right down to the impenetrable vocabulary words and extended instrumental passages -- but to limit the Coheed and Cambria experience to the music that they perform is to miss a huge chunk of the experience. There is a long, involved story to be followed, there are comic books to be read, and there is an entire history (or a mythology, if you prefer) to make sense of and memorize. It is the depth to which Coheed and Cambria are willing to extend their narrative that inspires such devotion in their surprisingly large fanbase.

As such, it shouldn't come as too much of a surprise that the Prize Fighter Inferno, the solo side project of Coheed and Cambria lead vocalist Claudio Sanchez, continues to expand on the story that Coheed and Cambria has established. Specifically, the album (with the typically unwieldy title My Brother's Blood Machine) is a tangential exploration of one of the minor groups of characters in the Coheed canon: the McCloud family. Rather than telling a proper story, My Brother's Blood Machine is more of a collection of vignettes, each of which give us a little bit more background on the family and its star-crossed life journey.

Sanchez has made the most of the opportunity that the eschewing of a traditional narrative provides -- the sheer number of musical styles on display throughout My Brother's Blood Machine is staggering. The album opens on a pop-electronic note called "The Going Price for Home", with synths buzzing and floating in and out of a roomy, unobtrusive mix, the relatively mellow feel of the electronics doing well to back up a subdued vocal performance. While the electronics reappear throughout the album, however, they are not its sole focus. Sanchez throws lots of acoustic-guitar-and-voice tracks onto the album (many of which have a Paul Simon covering early Peter Gabriel sort of vibe to them), some upbeat, buzzy pop (with pianos!) finds its way into the track list ("Who Watches the Watchmen?"), and a groovy, plugged-in workout shows up right at the end to throw a bone to the Coheed and Cambria fans that feel left behind by Sanchez's stylistic choices ("78", which is, surprise surprise, relegated to track 78).

So obviously, variety is not the issue with My Brother's Blood Machine. The question, then, is this: If Sanchez's Prize Fighter Inferno is so dexterous as to be able to juggle so many different genres, why does the end product feel so empty?

Maybe it's the amount of time that the album took to put together; it says right in the album's liner notes (presented as a set of modified tarot cards) that it was "recorded over the span of seven years, in multiple environments, with random recording devices". This fact alone makes the attempt to string together some common thread in the songs somewhat laughable; you mean to tell me that, seven years before the album was released, Sanchez knew that he'd be writing about the same family seven years down the road? This makes such tenuous inclusions as "Wayne Andrews, the Old Beekeeper" and "Run, Gunner Recall, Run! The Town Wants You Dead!" feel even more out of place than they normally would, sore thumbs that actually sound older than their brethren, composed before the McClouds were even a spark in Sanchez's mind.

My Brother's Blood Machine is not without its charm, as it's hard to resist the appeal of songs like "A Death in the Family", which unabashedly uses a repeated major-key "La da doo da daaaah da" hook to beautiful effect, and the aforementioned "Who Watches the Watchmen?" could and should compete for airspace with anything on modern rock radio. Still, these are brief highlights in a sea of pretension -- while one might like to label Sanchez's efforts ambitious, it seems downright pretentious to expect his fanbase to buy that his seven-year when-he-feels-like-it solo project had a common theme all this time. Combine that attitude with the lack of truly catchy melodies or gripping emotional moments, and My Brother's Blood Machine is quickly relegated to the status of a mere curiosity, one that even the staunchest of Coheed and Cambria fans might be well advised to do without.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.