The Saints: Imperious Delirium

With more lineup changes in over 30 years than Elizabeth Taylor has had husbands, everything old is new again with The Saints. Now a pared-down trio, their latest album is brilliantly experimental yet solidly punk.

The Saints

Imperious Delirium

Label: Wildflower
US Release Date: 2007-05-15
UK Release Date: 2006-11-13

A band lumped into the same iconic category as the Sex Pistols and the Ramones -- and by Bob Geldof, no less -- carries some pretty heavy weight to their resume. Moreover, of the three influential punk bands, the Saints are the only ones who are still performing.

While the Sex Pistols were the poster boys for the angry, anti-establishment sector of punk, bedecked in spikes and anarchy signs before they became accessibly up for grabs at the mall, the Ramones were the happy-go-lucky outcasts who were yes, anti-establishment, but had no intentions of staging a monarchic or governmental coup. While the Saints shared much more in common with the Ramones, they could be considered their older, wiser, and slightly mopier brother. Not as buoyant as the Ramones, yet nowhere near the angry drunkard status of the Sex Pistols, the Saints' music was somewhere in the middle.

Right out of the gate, EMI (the record label who inspired a rather unflattering Sex Pistols tune) had planned to market the Australian band as a lower-hemisphere version of the Pistols, attempting to dress them in ripped denim and studs. Uncomfortable with the intended and overly stylized image, the Saints did their own thing fashion-wise, preferring to let their music sell the band itself. While in the beginning, the Saints favored a more straight-forward style of punk very reminiscent of possessing elements of the Clash, they later leaned towards new wave and pop with a hint of R&B occasionally rounding out the package.

When you've had as many lineup changes as the Saints, your musical influences are bound to find themselves switching up from time to time. While the Saints are still recording and touring, the band's lineup has changed considerably, with the sole remaining original member singer/songwriter/guitarist Chris Bailey as the only common denominator. During their 33-year career, the Saints have seen no less than eight rotations of the turnstile in the band's ever-revolving lineup.

Yet another roster change preceded the recording of Imperious Delirium: In the middle of a world tour, the band's lead guitarist made an abrupt departure. That left Baily and the remaining members, drummer Pete Wilkinson and bassist Caspar Wijnberg, to finish the tour on their own. Following its completion, the now-trio holed up for three weeks and cranked out Imperious Delirium with this new, streamlined incarnation of the band.

What could have proved disastrous, actually worked out rather nicely, with Imperious Delirium standing as Exhibit A testimony to the resiliency of the Saints, who still sound as raw as ever. Baily's voice hasn't changed in almost 30 years, still retaining the discontented ring of youth to it in spite of the band's venerable status as elder statesmen of punk.

The disc kicks off with "Drunk in Babylon", lulling the listener into a false sense of hangover with its gently picked arpeggios before kicking in with growling, hammering punk guitar. The Saints' melodic cacophony closes out the tune and then brings it back full circle, ending on an uncharacteristic calm.

"Drunk in Babylon" is only the first of several musical and thematic dichotomies on Imperious Delirium. The buzzing "Declare War" has Bailey's voice taking on the timbre of the late Jim Morrison (or even the Lizard King's 21st Century replacement, the Cult's Ian Astbury) and holds a message that can be applied to either a dysfunctional relationship or the world's current tumultuous state.

In keeping with the beautiful incongruity, there's the strange and seemingly impossible concept of the punk ballad, as laid out by "The Other Side of the World". With lyrics chock full of melancholy and longing such as "The tyranny of distance / Is a cold mistress / I want to be with you tonight / And as I think, therefore I am," it's as beautiful as an oxymoronic punk ballad can get.

Not to be ignored is the tremendous musicianship of the current incarnation of the Saints. The trio plays around with unexpected countermelodies on "So Close" as a piano plunks out one half and a searing guitar riff pounds out the other. Bailey also accomplishes the rather impressive feat of making his guitar sound almost like a saxophone on the solo and coda of "Getting Away With Murder".

For every leap of brilliance, there are bound to be a few steps backwards. "War of Independence" is overly ambitious, clocking in at five minutes long and sounding like a reject from Hedwig and the Angry Inch. Bailey's vocals sound very strained, although, granted, part of the beauty of being a grizzled punk veteran is not having to sound like Andrea Bocelli. Nevertheless, the track comes off as an ill fit, even among the garden of varied and pleasantly thorny roses on the disc.

The Saints' experimentation works very well on the bulk of the album. Tracks like "Learning to Crawl" are highlighted by faint whispers of blues-by-way-of-punk drum work that shines on the song's breakdown, the high hat cymbals crashing and working their way into a beat frenzy. On top of all that is a guitar sound fuzzier than a Muppet, keeping equal pace with the drums and erupting in a dissonant, buzzing blur capped with a literal stroke of brilliance, a perfectly imperfect spur-of-the-moment decision by Bailey to scrape the pick against the strings, hesitating midway and then following through with unbridled fury.

In the midst of all of the experimentation, there are moments like "Drowning" that switch gears to straight-forward, traditional punk, but fits in nicely. With the exception of a few middling tracks, Imperious Delirium resurrects the Saints for a new generation and shows the youngins how it's done.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.