The Voice of the Demagogue and American So-Called Democracy

Walter Huston and Karen Morley in Gabriel Over the White House (1933)

Gabriel Over the White House seriously asks a question that should only be asked as satire or farce: what if the best solution for the US is to have a fascist dictator in charge?

Gabriel Over the White House

Director: Gregory La Cava
Cast: Walter Huston, Karen Morley
Year: 1933

The United States bills itself as a representative democracy. This means of course that it is not a direct democracy. Citizens do not have the right to vote for each political action, our voices are not heard on each matter. Rather, we are asked to vote for representatives whom we are supposed to trust to take our voices into account and indeed to speak with the authority of “our” voice in their dealings with other politicians, both within the state and outside of it.

Since our only access to democracy is through representation, we find ourselves desiring someone who is representative of what we are.
A direct democracy, where every eligible citizen votes on all major matters of state, has long been thought unwieldy and impracticable for a country the size and density (with respect to population, if not intelligence) of the United States. But there's more to it than that. The Electoral College, if nothing else, demonstrates that even the efficacy of the vote (the thing we are all supposed to be “rocking” on 8 November in order to guarantee our voice is heard) is questionable, at best.

There are several measures taken by the United States to control and mitigate the supposed power of the vote. Strictly speaking, as we all know, we do not vote for a president. We vote for electors who “promise” but are not obligated to vote for the candidate of our choice. All of the states, except Maine and Nebraska, operate on a “winner-take-all” basis. So a vote doesn’t “really count” unless it's part of the majority vote of that state. If our voices are heard at all, they are filtered, muffled, and utterly diluted. None of this, by the way, has anything to do with rigged elections or voter fraud -- although accusations of fraud and the measures taken to prevent it are another effective means of controlling the vote and wresting the one real decision vouchsafed to the average citizen out of her hands (that is, the voter identification laws, supposedly designed to prevent fraud, really serve to limit suffrage by raising impediments against the poor, the black and latino, and other "undesirables"). This is just the way it works.

The notion that our voices are both being heard and spoken for us is an intriguing and troubling one. It also explains the strange appeal of a specter that haunts any representative democracy and threatens to either dismantle it (if you are an optimist about the nature of representative democracy) or to set aside the pretense toward a government “of the people” that only serves to mask the fact that we already live in something approximating an oligarchy (if you are a cynic). That specter is the demagogue.

In the week surrounding Election Day (4-10 November), the Film Forum in New York City will be hosting a film festival entitled “Demagogues”, curated with a cleverly light touch of cynicism by Bruce Goldstein. The festival features some true masterworks of film, including Orson Welles’s Citizen Kane, Frank Capra’s dark yet wonderfully idealistic Meet John Doe, the uproarious Duck Soup featuring the Marx Brothers, Elia Kazan’s haunting A Face in the Crowd (which in my opinion should have launched a serious dramatic career for star Andy Griffith), and the impressive All the King’s Men.

It also includes one film that I consider to be absolutely lousy, simply abominable in every conceivable way. This is a film that stars a superb actor (Walter Huston) and yet every performance in it, including his, is ham-fisted hackwork that makes the thespian endeavors of an Ed Wood film look like Shakespeare. It boasts a screenplay by Carey Wilson, the man responsible for Mutiny on the Bounty, and yet the script is rife with hogwash patriotic sentimentalism, a bizarre affection for fascism, and heavy-handed scenes that resemble that moment when your local improv theater group takes requests. It was directed by Gregory La Cava, best known for Stage Door and My Man Godfrey (both solid, if not outstanding, films) and yet the mise-en-scène is artless, the editing sloppy, and the overall impact of the film is akin to that neighbor you once had that hectors you into listening to his opinion by being louder than everyone else, babbles utter nonsense laced with offensive points of view, and then, when he sees no one cares, tries to appeal to your sympathy because he is so misunderstood.

The film is Gabriel Over the White House and it is, to borrow a phrase I have always admired by Ralph Peer, “pluperfect awful”. Yet, if you are anywhere near the Film Forum, and you have time to see only one of the films on the list, I recommend that this film be the one you see. If you are not nearby, try to find it through other means. It's not a good film but it's a telling film -- and one that pertains to our time to a disturbing degree.

James Fenimore Cooper (yeah, that guy) defined a “demagogue” as someone who fits four criteria: 1. he presents himself as a man of the people; 2. he inspires a reaction founded on emotion rather than reason; 3. he mines that reaction for his own political gain and; 4. he shows no qualms in abrogating the established laws and procedures of governance. The demagogue eats away at the very core of a representative democracy by exploiting the fundamental contradiction that lies in its relation to the “voice of the public”. Since we are asked to focus our suffrage on relatively rare moments, since we are forced to form a coalition of the essentially disenfranchised, we often find ourselves in a position of seeking out someone “just like us”, whatever that may be taken to mean.

In other words, since our only access to democracy is through representation, we find ourselves desiring someone who is representative of what we are. This can, of course, be taken in multiple ways. We might mean that the elected official promises to enact legislation that reflects our views of a better society, a better world. But often -- far too often -- what we really mean is that we want someone who is like us.

This is the gap between reasonable self-interest and narcissism that the demagogue exploits. The demagogue claims to speak for you because he is one of you. He speaks with your voice. He knows that he acts in your best interest, even if it's against your will, because he recognizes himself as you, only a better and more focused version of you. In Freudian terms, he is the outsized Ego that placates the Id by promising it fulfillment in due time while burning the Superego (the repository of social law) to the ground.

Gabriel Over the White House seriously asks a question that should only be asked as satire or farce: what if the best solution for the United States is to have a fascist dictator in charge? Only this is a dictator of the people (all dictators claim to be)! This is a dictator with the best interests of the people at heart and he is simply cutting through the egregious red tape of government by dismantling all of the checks and balances, all of the safeguards set in place (again, a claim made by all dictators).

Worst of all, in my opinion, it's not so subtly suggested that this despot, this usurper of anything resembling reasonable government, is possessed by the spirit of Abraham Lincoln. That’s right: the great emancipator becomes the great dictator. This pernicious bit of revisionism asks us to believe that the president who sought to ensure that “government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth” was not only disingenuous but a tyrant. Indeed all truly great leaders, by the logic of this film, are necessarily tyrants.

The president of Gabriel Over the White House recklessly fires Cabinet members for disagreeing with him, adjourns Congress and imposes martial law during a time of peace, creates tribunals that “court martial” citizens and execute them, bullies foreign leaders through threat of force, and bypasses the rule of law -- all in the name of the greater good. The film would have us believe that the greater good is indeed realized through such measures.

This is the ultimate question or lesson of the film -- a lesson I would hope we could engage despite the lamentable ideology that imbues Gabriel Over the White House: is the point of government to reach an end without regard to the means by which that end is attained, or do the means matter, perhaps matter more than the ends? Is social betterment achieved through outrageous and irresponsible means really betterment in any reasonable sense of the term? Are politics about a set of specific goals or ought they be more concerned with the process in which we involve ourselves as we negotiate the differences among us in search for a better way of living? Is a Carthaginian peace worth having?

So, as we wend our way toward a contentious and frightful election, take a look at cinematic representations of the demagogue. Watch Citizen Kane and A Face in the Crowd. These are fantastic films. Indeed, that's perhaps what makes them more difficult in relation to social ideals. These films are seductive and so are the characters that inhabit them. Our real social concerns are smoothed over by the aesthetic balm they present.

The advantage, therefore, of Gabriel Over the White House is that it's an abhorrent and bad film. It thereby permits a more perspicacious view of the demagogue qua seducer. The aesthetic failings of the film reveal the terrifying element of ideology that is never far from the political stage. The traitor (the Benedict Arnold, the Judas) is always one “like us”. Gabriel Over the White House is not a good film, but it is one we all should watch very carefully.





The Avett Brothers Go Back-to-Basics with 'The Third Gleam'

For their latest EP, The Third Gleam, the Avett Brothers leave everything behind but their songs and a couple of acoustic guitars, a bass, and a banjo.


PM Picks Playlist 1: Rett Madison, Folk Devils + More

The first PopMatters Picks Playlist column features searing Americana from Rett Madison, synthpop from Everything and Everybody, the stunning electropop of Jodie Nicholson, the return of post-punk's Folk Devils, and the glammy pop of Baby FuzZ.


David Lazar's 'Celeste Holm  Syndrome' Appreciates Hollywood's Unsung Character Actors

David Lazar's Celeste Holm Syndrome documents how character actor work is about scene-defining, not scene-stealing.


David Lord Salutes Collaborators With "Cloud Ear" (premiere)

David Lord teams with Jeff Parker (Tortoise) and Chad Taylor (Chicago Underground) for a new collection of sweeping, frequently meditative compositions. The results are jazz for a still-distant future that's still rooted in tradition.


Laraaji Takes a "Quiet Journey" (premiere +interview)

Afro Transcendentalist Laraaji prepares his second album of 2020, the meditative Moon Piano, recorded inside a Brooklyn church. The record is an example of what the artist refers to as "pulling music from the sky".


Blues' Johnny Ray Daniels Sings About "Somewhere to Lay My Head" (premiere)

Johnny Ray Daniels' "Somewhere to Lay My Head" is from new compilation that's a companion to a book detailing the work of artist/musician/folklorist Freeman Vines. Vines chronicles racism and injustice via his work.


The Band of Heathens Find That Life Keeps Getting 'Stranger'

The tracks on the Band of Heathens' Stranger are mostly fun, even when on serious topics, because what other choice is there? We all may have different ideas on how to deal with problems, but we are all in this together.


Landowner's 'Consultant' Is OCD-Post-Punk With Obsessive Precision

Landowner's Consultant has all the energy of a punk-rock record but none of the distorted power chords.


NYFF: 'American Utopia' Sets a Glorious Tone for Our Difficult Times

Spike Lee's crisp concert film of David Byrne's Broadway show, American Utopia, embraces the hopes and anxieties of the present moment.


South Africa's Phelimuncasi Thrill with Their Gqom Beats on '2013-2019'

A new Phelimuncasi anthology from Nyege Nyege Tapes introduces listeners to gqom and the dancefloors of Durban, South Africa.


What 'O Brother, Where Art Thou?' Gets Right (and Wrong) About America

Telling the tale of the cyclops through the lens of high and low culture, in O'Brother, Where Art Thou? the Coens hammer home a fatalistic criticism about the ways that commerce, violence, and cosmetic Christianity prevail in American society .


Wolf Parade's 'Apologies to the Queen Mary' Turns 15

Wolf Parade's debut, Apologies to the Queen Mary, is an indie rock classic. It's a testament to how creative, vital, and exciting the indie rock scene felt in the 2000s.


Literary Scholar Andrew H. Miller On Solitude As a Common Bond

Andrew H. Miller's On Not Being Someone Else considers how contemplating other possibilities for one's life is a way of creating meaning in the life one leads.


Fransancisco's "This Woman's Work" Cover Is Inspired By Heartache (premiere)

Indie-folk brothers Fransancisco dedicate their take on Kate Bush's "This Woman's Work" to all mothers who have lost a child.


Rodd Rathjen Discusses 'Buoyancy', His Film About Modern Slavery

Rodd Rathjen's directorial feature debut, Buoyancy, seeks to give a voice to the voiceless men and boys who are victims of slavery in Southeast Asia.


Hear the New, Classic Pop of the Parson Red Heads' "Turn Around" (premiere)

The Parson Red Heads' "Turn Around" is a pop tune, but pop as heard through ears more attuned to AM radio's glory days rather than streaming playlists and studio trickery.


Blitzen Trapper on the Afterlife, Schizophrenia, Civil Unrest and Our Place in the Cosmos

Influenced by the Tibetan Book of the Dead, Blitzen Trapper's new album Holy Smokes, Future Jokes plumbs the comedic horror of the human condition.


Chris Smither's "What I Do" Is an Honest Response to Old Questions (premiere + interview)

How does Chris Smither play guitar that way? What impact does New Orleans have on his music? He might not be able to answer those questions directly but he can sure write a song about it.

Collapse Expand Reviews

Collapse Expand Features

PM Picks
Collapse Expand Pm Picks

© 1999-2020 All rights reserved.
PopMatters is wholly independent, women-owned and operated.