The Walking Dead: Season 6, Episode 11 - "Knots Untie"

M. King Adkins

Rick and company discover a broader world beyond their walls, where diplomacy suddenly matters as much as knife skills.

The Walking Dead

Airtime: Sundays, 8pm
Cast: Andrew Lincoln, Steven Yuen, Lauren Cohen
Subtitle: Season 6, Episode 11 - "Knots Untie"
Network: AMC
Air Date: 2016-02-28

I mentioned last week that some of The Walking Dead's most hardcore fans complain when the show’s action ebbs. I don't think we should expect any long term end to action-oriented plots, but I do believe the nature of the threats Rick (Andrew Lincoln), Daryl (Norman Reedus), Carol (Melissa McBride), and Glenn (Steven Yeun) will face is destined to change, and I’m not sure how some fans will respond. Beyond their tangle with the governor, most of their battles have been existential face-offs with the walkers themselves. Of course, those walkers remain an existential threat, but this show has larger thematic aspirations; the reality is, it always has.

The Walking Dead has never been simply about survival; it's about how society rebuilds itself in the wake of disaster, and exploring that theme means moving beyond desperate one-on-one battles to the death and into larger, more stable communities. As Jesus (Tom Payne) says early in this week's episode, Rick and company's world is "about to get a whole lot bigger". I suspect that life for our survivors will increasingly be less about fighting zombies, and more about fighting other communities.

To understand what's happening means thinking about just exactly what genre The Walking Dead fits into. Many people assume post-apocalyptic stories are simply a particular brand of science fiction. In fact, post-apocalyptic works have very different origins. Most science fiction might also be called "dystopian". Such stories take a flaw or potential problem in society and magnify it into a disturbing vision of the future.

Orwell's 1984, for instance, imagines life under a top-down communist regime; Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid’s Tale imagines life in a world where fundamentalist Christianity dominates the government; any given episode of the original Star Trek series offers a world where mobsters rule, or children run things, or race dictates political power. In the end, these kinds of stories allow us to think critically about our own society, or own flaws.

Post-apocalyptic stories, on the other hand, spring out of early social contract theory, efforts by philosophers like Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau to describe the "best" form of government by trying to imagine how society began. Suppose -- such tales usually begin -- we imagine man in his most primitive state, living alone, subsisting on what he can catch or grow. Why would he give up his "freedom" and "liberty" in such a situation? Only in exchange for benefits, like "security".

And so on, and so on, until the given philosopher has established why democracy or monarchy or communism obviously makes the best form of government, given these beginnings. Even the US Constitution bears the marks of such thinking: “We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” The point here is to establish the trade-offs to be made between humans as individuals when they join with others in a "union".

The idea that humans were ever once "noble savages" who developed government to mitigate their "nasty brutish" existences eventually fell into disrepute as science, and especially anthropology, arose and discredited such fantasies. If it was no longer possible to imagine humankind starting anew in the past, it was still possible to imagine them starting anew in the future.

Thus arose the post-apocalyptic tale, in which all of society is destroyed, and those who remain must build a better society in its wake. Novels like The Day of the Triffids, films such as 12 Monkeys, and series like The Walking Dead, all allow their authors to speculate about what might make the best sort of society if it were possible to suddenly start all over again.

This has been an important element of The Walking Dead from the very beginning. It’s there on a rooftop in downtown Atlanta when Rick argues with Merle (Michael Rooker) over whether racism makes sense in a world where most of the population has already been destroyed. It’s there in the agrarian society that develops on Herschel’s (Scott Wilson) farm. It’s there in the form of the governor’s dictatorship. In truth, each and every step forward in this story has been the examination of a new kind of government, from the failure of science at the CDC, to the failure of pacifism among the original citizens of Alexandria.

Yet, where much of this exploration has occurred is in the form of individual characters -- Carol's survival at all cost vs. Morgan's (Lennie James) zen-like warrior stance -- the time has finally come to widen out the conversation and think about the stakes on a larger scale. The coming of Jesus heralds a consideration of societies on a larger scale, and the various ways in which they might govern themselves and deal with one another.

Thus, in this week’s episode, Rick, Michonne (Danai Gurira), Maggie (Lauren Cohan), Daryl, Abraham (Michael Cudlitz), and Glenn, visit a community not so very different from their own. They eventually discover this community has become a kind of vassal state to another band led by the mysterious Negan (Jeffrey Dean Morgan). Our group makes a new deal, promising to serve as mercenaries for Jesus in exchange for food and medicine, and so diplomacy in this new world order begins.

Certainly this doesn’t spell the end of action for The Walking Dead, as we discovered in this episode when Rick steps in to stop an assassination. Indeed, we’re offered the promise of a much larger, perhaps more extended conflict over the weeks and episodes to come. The stakes, howver, have changed for the characters and for the show, as they must for The Walking Dead’s narrative to continue to grow and develop. Maggie’s efforts at diplomacy may not make for the same heart-pounding action of Rick trapped alone in a tank, but what they tell us about ourselves -- especially in a topsy-turvy election year -- may be more important.


So far J. J. Abrams and Rian Johnson resemble children at play, remaking the films they fell in love with. As an audience, however, we desire a fuller experience.

As recently as the lackluster episodes I-III of the Star Wars saga, the embossed gold logo followed by scrolling prologue text was cause for excitement. In the approach to the release of any of the then new prequel installments, the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare, followed by the Lucas Film logo, teased one's impulsive excitement at a glimpse into the next installment's narrative. Then sat in the movie theatre on the anticipated day of release, the sight and sound of the Twentieth Century Fox fanfare signalled the end of fevered anticipation. Whatever happened to those times? For some of us, is it a product of youth in which age now denies us the ability to lose ourselves within such adolescent pleasure? There's no answer to this question -- only the realisation that this sensation is missing and it has been since the summer of 2005. Star Wars is now a movie to tick off your to-watch list, no longer a spark in the dreary reality of the everyday. The magic has disappeared… Star Wars is spiritually dead.

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.