TV

The X-Files: Season 10, Episodes 1 and 2 - "My Struggle" and "Founder's Mutation"

Duchovny and Anderson have an undeniable chemistry, and the world of The X-Files, imperfect though it may sometimes be, is a welcome diversion from our real-world paranoias.


The X-Files

Airtime: Sunday, 10pm (premiere) and Mondays, 8pm (regular timeslot)
Cast: David Duchovny, Gillian Anderson, Mitch Pileggi, William B. Davis, Annet Mahendru, Doug Savant, Christopher Logan
Subtitle: Season 10, Episode 1 - "My Struggle" and Season 10, Episode 2 - "Founder's Mutation"
Network: FOX
Air dates: 2016-01-24 and 2016-01-25
Amazon

When the return of The X-Files was announced last year, longtime fans anticipated the revival with equal parts excitement and trepidation. They celebrated the return of a favorite series and its iconic characters, Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) and Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson), yet couldn’t help but feel worried that it wouldn’t live up to what made the series so great. In many ways these first two episodes, “My Struggle” and “Founder’s Mutation”, confirm fears and surpass expectations.

“My Struggle” focuses on the larger mythology of the series, and is the weaker of the first two episodes. Unfortunately, as the mythology grew more labyrinthine and complicated during the first run of The X-Files, it became more convoluted than complex, and the final seasons of the show suffered for its increasingly confusing plot. The larger government conspiracies to cover up knowledge of alien life were at the heart of the mythology, particularly as it was originally linked to the mysterious disappearance of Mulder’s sister, Samantha, but as the seasons went on the conspiracy became an unwieldy mess, almost impossible to follow.

Where the first episode does succeed is in making the revival feel like The X-Files. The direction, Mark Snow’s score, and the interaction between Mulder and Scully all serve to bring the viewer back into a world that feels connected to the original run. As always, Scully is reluctantly drawn into Mulder’s obsessive search for the truth despite her own skepticism, but also in spite of her worry for his sanity. Their dynamic is established and familiar, yet their history is also much more front and center as they’re obviously no longer "together", but still care a great deal about one another.

Mulder’s latest obsession is fueled by Tad O’Malley (Joel McHale), a conspiracy theorist talk show host intent on revealing the larger conspiracy of a government cover up and imminent takeover of America, post 9/11. O’Malley’s proof comes in the form of Sveta (Annet Mahendru), a young woman who claims to be a multiple abductee and the victim of a plot to steal the babies from her numerous alien pregnancies. As he convinces Mulder and Scully to meet Sveta, Mulder is immediately convinced of her story, while Scully requires testing and hard science to prove Sveta’s claims.

Though this is certainly not unfamiliar territory for The X-Files, the speed with which Mulder believes O’Malley and Sveta, to the exclusion of everything else he’s ever uncovered, is too convenient and probably a matter of the time limitations imposed by a six-episode run. Nevertheless, the episode quickly runs through Roswell flashbacks, the reveal of an actual ARV (alien replica vehicle) that can become invisible, shadowy meetings at night, and the unbelievable return of the Cigarette Smoking Man (William B. Davis), smoking through a tracheotomy, no less. For some it may seem to be too much, too fast and only serves to emphasize the failings of the mythology arc.

Conversely, “Founder’s Mutation” is a callback to some of the great monster-of-the-week episodes (though it's not strictly a standalone) that The X-Files did consistently well throughout its original run. Opening on Dr. Sanjay (Christopher Logan) experiencing strange auditory sensitivity and pain, the episode quickly takes a turn as he’s driven to suicide at his mysterious, top-secret workplace. The particularly gruesome form of his death (a letter opener he himself drives into his brain through his ear canal) foreshadows the disturbing secret lab run by the Department of Defense to secretly study children with rare genetic mutations. The questions surrounding Dr. Sanjay’s death also lead the official reinstatement of Mulder and Scully as FBI partners answering directly to Assistant Director Walter Skinner (Mitch Pileggi), reestablishing another key dynamic in the series.

Uncovering the lab and its shadowy leader, Augustus Goldman (Doug Savant), leads Mulder and Scully to examine not only the real reasons behind the study of these children, but also to muse on their own son, William. William’s adoption as a baby was an attempt to protect him as he manifested certain abilities that point to alien biology. The children in Goldman’s lab have similar origins and display abilities of their own, requiring them to be locked away from the rest of the world. As Mulder and Scully contemplate their own individual versions of life with William as he grows up, both eventually envision some tragic or horrific scenario, clearly brought to the surface through their investigation of Goldman’s lab.

Though Scully’s pregnancy and the birth of William were sometimes narratively problematic in the show’s original run, Anderson’s performance and the larger sacrifice of his adoption serve to bring in a personal and emotional component that was often more effective than the mythology, even when they were intertwined. “Founder’s Mutation” is a perfect example of that balance that “My Struggle” failed to achieve. More than elaborate plots, the heart of The X-Files was always in the relationship Mulder and Scully and that’s why “Founder’s Mutation” was a much more successful outing.

Four episodes remain, some centered on the mythology and some monster-of-the-week, and hopefully they’ll continue to retain the essence of the series. While these first two episodes may forecast an uneven revival season, it’s a pleasure to have The X-Files -- and that particular brand of X-Files humor -- back on television, even if it’s only for a little while. Duchovny and Anderson have an undeniable chemistry that’s wonderful to see onscreen again, and the world of The X-Files, imperfect though it may sometimes be, is a welcome diversion from our real-world paranoias.

7

The year in song reflected the state of the world around us. Here are the 70 songs that spoke to us this year.

70. The Horrors - "Machine"

On their fifth album V, the Horrors expand on the bright, psychedelic territory they explored with Luminous, anchoring the ten new tracks with retro synths and guitar fuzz freakouts. "Machine" is the delicious outlier and the most vitriolic cut on the record, with Faris Badwan belting out accusations to the song's subject, who may even be us. The concept of alienation is nothing new, but here the Brits incorporate a beautiful metaphor of an insect trapped in amber as an illustration of the human caught within modernity. Whether our trappings are technological, psychological, or something else entirely makes the statement all the more chilling. - Tristan Kneschke

Keep reading... Show less

This has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it.

It hardly needs to be said that the last 12 months haven't been everyone's favorite, but it does deserve to be noted that 2017 has been a remarkable year for shoegaze. If it were only for the re-raising of two central pillars of the initial scene it would still have been enough, but that wasn't even the half of it. Other longtime dreamers either reappeared or kept up their recent hot streaks, and a number of relative newcomers established their place in what has become one of the more robust rock subgenre subcultures out there.

Keep reading... Show less
Theatre

​'The Ferryman': Ephemeral Ideas, Eternal Tragedies

The current cast of The Ferryman in London's West End. Photo by Johan Persson. (Courtesy of The Corner Shop)

Staggeringly multi-layered, dangerously fast-paced and rich in characterizations, dialogue and context, Jez Butterworth's new hit about a family during the time of Ireland's the Troubles leaves the audience breathless, sweaty and tearful, in a nightmarish, dry-heaving haze.

"Vanishing. It's a powerful word, that"

Northern Ireland, Rural Derry, 1981, nighttime. The local ringleader of the Irish Republican Army gun-toting comrades ambushes a priest and tells him that the body of one Seamus Carney has been recovered. It is said that the man had spent a full ten years rotting in a bog. The IRA gunslinger, Muldoon, orders the priest to arrange for the Carney family not to utter a word of what had happened to the wretched man.

Keep reading... Show less
10

Aaron Sorkin's real-life twister about Molly Bloom, an Olympic skier turned high-stakes poker wrangler, is scorchingly fun but never takes its heroine as seriously as the men.

Chances are, we will never see a heartwarming Aaron Sorkin movie about somebody with a learning disability or severe handicap they had to overcome. This is for the best. The most caffeinated major American screenwriter, Sorkin only seems to find his voice when inhabiting a frantically energetic persona whose thoughts outrun their ability to verbalize and emote them. The start of his latest movie, Molly's Game, is so resolutely Sorkin-esque that it's almost a self-parody. Only this time, like most of his better work, it's based on a true story.

Keep reading... Show less
7

There's something characteristically English about the Royal Society, whereby strangers gather under the aegis of some shared interest to read, study, and form friendships and in which they are implicitly agreed to exist insulated and apart from political differences.

There is an amusing detail in The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn that is emblematic of the kind of intellectual passions that animated the educated elite of late 17th-century England. We learn that Henry Oldenburg, the first secretary of the Royal Society, had for many years carried on a bitter dispute with Robert Hooke, one of the great polymaths of the era whose name still appears to students of physics and biology. Was the root of their quarrel a personality clash, was it over money or property, over love, ego, values? Something simple and recognizable? The precise source of their conflict was none of the above exactly but is nevertheless revealing of a specific early modern English context: They were in dispute, Margaret Willes writes, "over the development of the balance-spring regulator watch mechanism."

Keep reading... Show less
8
Pop Ten
Mixed Media
PM Picks

© 1999-2017 Popmatters.com. All rights reserved.
Popmatters is wholly independently owned and operated.

rating-image